Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T12:48:05.911Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Behind the Spam: A “Spectral Analysis” of Predatory Publishers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 October 2016

Jeffrey Beall*
Affiliation:
Auraria Library, University of Colorado Denver1100 Lawrence St. Denver, Colorado, 80204USA email: jeffrey.beall@ucdenver.edu
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Most researchers today are bombarded with spam email solicitations from questionable scholarly publishers. These emails solicit article manuscripts, editorial board service, and even ad hoc peer reviews. These “predatory” publishers exploit the scholarly publishing process, patterning themselves after legitimate scholarly publishers yet performing little or no peer review and quickly accepting submitted manuscripts and collecting fees from submitting authors. These counterfeit publishers and journals have published much junk science? especially in the field of cosmology? threatening the integrity of the academic record. This paper examines the current state of predatory publishing and advises researchers how to navigate scholarly publishing to best avoid predatory publishers and other scholarly publishing-related perils.

Type
Contributed Papers
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2016 

References

Davvaz, B., Santilli, R. M., & Vougiouklis, T. Mathematical prediction of Ying's twin universes. 2014, American Journal of Modern Physics, 4 (3), 59 Google Scholar
Suleiman, R. The dark side revealed: A complete relativity theory predicts the content of the universe. 2013, Progress in Physics, 9 (4), 3440 Google Scholar
Zaho, L. Riding the wave of open access: Providing library research support for scholarly publishing literacy. 2014, Australian Academic & Research Libraries, 45 (1), 318. doi:10.1080/00048623.2014.882873 Google Scholar