Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T06:40:24.572Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The bright end of the exo-Zodi luminosity function: Disk evolution and implications for exo-Earth detectability

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 January 2014

G. M. Kennedy
Affiliation:
Institute of Astronomy, University of Cambridge, Madingley Road, Cambridge CB3 0HA, UK email: gkennedy@ast.cam.ac.uk
M. C. Wyatt
Affiliation:
Institute of Astronomy, University of Cambridge, Madingley Road, Cambridge CB3 0HA, UK email: gkennedy@ast.cam.ac.uk
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

This contribution summarises the first characterisation of the 12 μm warm dust (“exo-Zodi”) luminosity function around Sun-like stars, focussing on the dustiest systems that can be identified by the WISE mission (Kennedy & Wyatt 2013). We use the sample of main-sequence stars observed by Hipparcos within 150pc as an unbiased sample, and report the detection of six new warm dust candidates. The ages of five of these new sources are unknown, meaning that they may be sites of terrestrial planet formation or rare analogues of other old warm dust systems. We show that the dustiest old (> Gyr) systems such as BD+20 307 are 1 in 10,000 occurrences. Bright warm dust is much more common around young (<120 Myr) systems, with a ~1% occurrence rate. We show that a two component in situ model where all stars have initially massive warm disks and in which warm debris is also generated at some random time along the stars' main-sequence lifetime, perhaps due to a collision, can explain the observations. However, if all stars only have initially massive warm disks these would not be visible at Gyr ages, and random collisions on the main-sequence are too infrequent to explain the high disk occurrence rate for young stars. That is, neither component can explain the observations on their own. Despite these conclusions, we cannot rule out an alternative dynamical model in which comets are scattered in from outer regions because the distribution of systems with the appropriate dynamics is unknown. Our in situ model predicts that the fraction of stars with exo-Zodi bright enough to cause problems for future exo-Earth imaging attempts is at least roughly 10%, and is higher for populations of stars younger than a few Gyr. This prediction of roughly 10% also applies to old stars because bright systems like BD+20 307 imply a population of fainter systems that were once bright, but are now decaying through fainter levels. Our prediction should be strongly tested by the Large Binocular Telescope Interferometer, which will provide valuable constraints and input for more detailed evolution models. A detection fraction lower than our prediction could indicate that the hot dust in systems like BD+20 307 has a cometary origin due to the quirks of the planetary dynamics. Population models of comet delivery need to be developed to help distinguish between different possible origins of warm dust.

Type
Contributed Papers
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2013 

References

Absil, O.et al. 2010, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol. 430, Pathways Towards Habitable Planets, ed. Coudé Du Foresto, V., Gelino, D. M., & Ribas, I., 293Google Scholar
Beichman, C. A.et al. 2006, ApJ, 652, 1674CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brott, I. & Hauschildt, P. H. 2005, in ESA Special Publication, Vol. 576, The Three-Dimensional Universe with Gaia, ed. Turon, C., O'Flaherty, K. S., & Perryman, M. A. C., 565Google Scholar
Hinz, P. M. 2009, in American Institute of Physics Conference Series, Vol. 1158, American Institute of Physics Conference Series, ed. Usuda, T., Tamura, M., & Ishii, M., 313–317Google Scholar
Jarrett, T. H.et al. 2011, ApJ, 735, 112Google Scholar
Kennedy, G. M. & Wyatt, M. C. 2012, MNRAS, 426, 91Google Scholar
Kennedy, G. M. & Wyatt, M. C. 2013, MNRASGoogle Scholar
Roberge, A.et al. 2012, PASP, 124, 799Google Scholar
Wright, E. L.et al. 2010, AJ, 140, 1868Google Scholar