Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T05:54:58.287Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A comparative study of GRB-Supernovae

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 January 2014

Lekshmi Resmi  and
Kuntal Misra
Lekshmi Resmi
Affiliation:
Dept. of Earth & Space Sciences, Indian Institute of Space Science & Technology, Trivandrum-695547, India. email: l.resmi@iist.ac.in
Kuntal Misra
Affiliation:
Aryabhatta Research Institute of Observational Sciences (ARIES) Manora Peak, Nainital-263129, India. email: kuntal@aries.res.in
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Optical afterglow observations hold the indirect key to type-Ic Supernovae associated with Gamma Ray Bursts. In several cases where there is no spectroscopic confirmation available, presence of the supernova is inferred from the red bump seen in late afterglow light-curves. We do extensive afterglow modeling to extract the supernova contribution as residue. We compare the residual lightcurves of Supernovae associated with GRB041006, GRB030329, GRB050525A and GRB090618.

Keywords

gamma rays: burstssupernovae
Type
Contributed Papers
Information
Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union , Volume 9 , Symposium S296: Supernova Environmental Impacts , January 2013 , pp. 354 - 355
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2014 

References

Hjorth, J., Sollerman, J., Moller, P., Johan, P. U., et al. 2003, Nature, 423, 847.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piran, T. 1999, Physics Reports, 314, 575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Resmi, L., Misra, K., Johannesson, G., Castro-Tirado, A. J.et al., 2012 MNRAS, 427, 288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woosley, S. E., & Bloom, J. S., 2006 ARAA, 44, 507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar