Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T09:29:08.307Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Consequences of Jet-Ejecta Interaction in Neutron Star Mergers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2023

Lorenzo Nativi
Affiliation:
Dept. of Astronomy and Oskar Klein Centre, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden
Stephan Rosswog
Affiliation:
Dept. of Astronomy and Oskar Klein Centre, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden
Mattia Bulla
Affiliation:
Dept. of Astronomy and Oskar Klein Centre, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden
Christoffer Lundman
Affiliation:
Dept. of Astronomy and Oskar Klein Centre, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden
Gavin P. Lamb
Affiliation:
Dept. of Physics and Astronomy, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
Grzegorz Kowal
Affiliation:
Escola de Artes, Ciências e Humanidades, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil email: lorenzo.nativi@astro.su.se
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

In the first observed neutron star merger, GW170817, two dynamical components, mildly- and ultra-relativistic outflows were detected independently. The first component triggered a rapidly evolving thermal transient named macronova (kilonova), while the second caused an observed short GRB where the early gamma-ray signal was followed by a multi-wavelength afterglow. These two distinct components are typically modelled independently and the observational consequences of their interplay are hardly explored. Here we summarize the results of 3D special-relativistic simulations that we have used to investigate the consequences of jet propagation through a realistic environment. We show how the presence of a jet can lead to the macronova being brighter and bluer for on-axis observers in the first few days. Then we show the consequences on the interaction on the shape of the emerging jet. Finally, we will discuss how small scale features in the emerging jet structure can impact the best-fit afterglow parameters.

Type
Contributed Paper
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of International Astronomical Union

References

Abbott, B. P. et al., 2017a, ApJ, 848, L13 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abbott, B. P. et al., 2017b, ApJ, 848, L12 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bulla, M., 2019, MNRAS, 489, 5037 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldstein, A. et al., 2017, ApJ, 848, L14 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Metzger, B. D., 2010, MNRAS, 406, 2650 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Metzger, B. D., 2019, Living Reviews in Relativity, 23, 1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mizuta, A., Aloy, M. A., 2009, ApJ, 699, 1261 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mooley, K. P. et al., 2018, Nature, 561, 355 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nativi, L., Bulla, M., Rosswog, S., Lundman, C., Kowal, G., Gizzi, D., Lamb, G. P. & Perego, A., 2021, MNRAS, 500, 1772 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nativi, L., Lamb, G. P., Rosswog, S., Lundman, C. & Kowal, G., 2022, MNRAS, 509, 903 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perego, A., Rosswog, S., Cabezón, R. M., Korobkin, O., Käppeli, R., Arcones, A. & Liebendörfer, M., 2014, MNRAS, 443, 3134 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ryan, G., van Eerten, H., Piro, L., Troja, E., 2020, ApJ, 896, 166 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Troja, E. et al., 2019, MNRAS, 489, 1919 Google Scholar