Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T21:53:50.851Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Formation of heavy element rich giant planets by giant impacts

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 October 2007

H. Genda
Affiliation:
Research Center for the Evolving Earth and Planets, Tokyo Institute of Technology, 2-12-1 Ookayama, Meguro-ku, Tokyo, Japan email: genda@geo.titech.ac.jp
M. Ikoma
Affiliation:
Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Tokyo Institute of Technology, 2-12-1 Ookayama, Meguro-ku, Tokyo, Japan
T. Guillot
Affiliation:
Observatoire de la Côte d'Azur, CNRS UMR 6202, 06304 Nice Cedex 4, France
S. Ida
Affiliation:
Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Tokyo Institute of Technology, 2-12-1 Ookayama, Meguro-ku, Tokyo, Japan
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

We have performed the smoothed particle hydrodynamic (SPH) simulations of collisions between two gas giant planets. Changes in masses of the ice/rock core and the H/He envelope due to the collisions are investigated. The main aim of this study is to constrain the origin and probability of a class of extrasolar hot Jupiters that have much larger cores and/or higher core/envelope mass ratios than those predicted by theories of accretion of gas giant planets. A typical example is HD 149026b. Theoretical models of the interior of HD 149026b (Sato et al. 2005; Fortney et al. 2006; Ikoma et al. 2006) predict that the planet contains a huge core of 50-80 Earth masses relative to the total mass of 110 Earth masses. Our SPH simulations demonstrate that such a gas giant is produced by a collision with an impact velocity of typically more than 2.5 times escape velocity and an impact angle of typically less than 10 degrees, which results in an enormous loss of the envelope gas and complete accretion of both cores.

Type
Contributed Papers
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2008

References

Canup, R. M. 2004, Icarus, 168, 433CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fortney, J. J., Saumon, D., Marley, M. S.Lodders, K., & Freedman, R. S. 2006, ApJ, 642, 495CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fukushige, T., Makino, J., & Kawai, A. 2005, PASJ, 57, 1009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guillot, T., Santos, N. C., Pont, F., Iro, N., Melo, C., & Ribas, I. 2006, A&A, 453, L21Google Scholar
Ikoma, M., Guillot, T., Genda, H., Tanigawa, T., & Ida, S. 2006, ApJ, 650, 1150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lucy, L. B. 1977, AJ, 82, 1013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marzari, F. & Weidenschilling, S. J. 2002, Icarus, 156, 570CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mizuno, H. 1980, Prog. Theor. Phys., 64, 544CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sato, B., et al. 2005, ApJ, 633, 465CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saumon, D., Chabrier, G., & Van Horn, H. M. 1995, ApJS, 99, 713CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tillotson, J. H. 1962, Report No. GA-3216, General Atomic, San Diego, CaliforniaGoogle Scholar