Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T20:46:24.205Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A minimal model of parallel electric field generation in a transversely inhomogeneous plasma

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 September 2007

David Tsiklauri*
Affiliation:
Institute for Materials Research, University of Salford, Greater Manchester, M5 4WT, United Kingdom.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The generation of parallel electric fields by the propagation of ion cyclotron waves (with frequency 0.3 ωci) in the plasma with a transverse density inhomogeneity was studied. Using two-fluid, cold plasma linearised equations, it was shown for the first time that, in this particular context, E generation can be understood by an analytic equation that couples E to the transverse electric field of the driving ion cyclotron wave. It was proven that the minimal model required to reproduce the previous kinetic simulation results of E generation [Tsiklauri et al 2005, Génot et al 2004] is the two-fluid, cold plasma approximation in the linear regime. By considering the numerical solutions it was also shown that the cause of E generation is the electron and ion flow separation induced by the transverse density inhomogeneity. We also investigate how E generation is affected by the mass ratio and found that amplitude attained by E decreases linearly as inverse of the mass ratio mi/me. For realistic mass ratio of mi/me=1836, such empirical scaling law, within a time corresponding to 3 periods of the driving ion cyclotron wave, is producing E=14 Vm−1 for solar coronal parameters. Increase in mass ratio does not have any effect on final parallel (magnetic field aligned) speed attained by electrons. However, parallel ion velocity decreases linearly with inverse of the mass ratio mi/me. These results can be interpreted as following: (i) ion dynamics plays no role in the E generation; (ii) E ∝ 1/mi scaling is caused by the fact that ωd = 0.3 ωci ∝ 1/mi is decreasing with the increase of ion mass, and hence the electron fluid can effectively “short-circuit” (recombine with) the slowly oscillating ions, hence producing smaller E.

Type
Contributed Papers
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2008

References

Carlson, C.W., et al. , 1998, Geophys. Res. Lett., 25, 2013Google Scholar
Cross, R.C., Miljak, D., 1993, Plasma Phys. Control. Fus., 35, 235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fletcher, L., 2005, Sp. Sci. Rev., 121, 141Google Scholar
Génot, V., et al. , 1999, J. Geophys. Res., 104, 22649Google Scholar
Génot, V., et al. , 2004, Ann. Geophys., 6, 2081Google Scholar
Goertz, C.K., Boswell, R.W., 1979, J. Geophys. Res., 84, 7239Google Scholar
Horwitz, J.L., 1982, Rev. Geophys. Sp. Phys., 20, 929Google Scholar
Krall, N.A., Trivelpiece, A.W., 1973, Principles of Plasma Physics, McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
Lysak, R.L., 1990, Sp. Sci. Rev., 52, 33Google Scholar
Mottez, F., et al. , 2006, Astron. Astrophys., 449, 449Google Scholar
Mozer, F.S., et al. , 1977, Phys. Rev. Lett., 38, 292Google Scholar
Nakariakov, V.M., et al. , 2006, Astron. Astrophys., 452, 343Google Scholar
Ofman, L., Sui, L., 2006, Astrophys. J. Lett., 644, 149Google Scholar
Ross, D.W., et al. , 1982, Phys. Fluids, 25, 652Google Scholar
Song, Y., Lysak, R.L., 2006, Phys. Rev. Lett., 96, 145002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strangeway, R.J., et al. , 2000, J. Geophys. Res., 105, 21129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tsiklauri, D., 2006a, New J. Phys., 8, 79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tsiklauri, D., 2006b, Astron. Astrophys., 455, 1073Google Scholar
Tsiklauri, D., 2007, New J. Phys., 9, 262Google Scholar
Tsiklauri, D., et al. , 2005a, New J. Phys., 7, 79Google Scholar
Tsiklauri, D., et al. , 2005b, Astron. Astrophys., 435, 1105Google Scholar
Yamada, M., et al. , 1997, Phys. Plasmas, 4, 1936Google Scholar