Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T17:51:04.716Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Photoabsorption of hydrocarbons in Titan's atmosphere

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 October 2010

Fabíola P. Magalhães
Affiliation:
Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro - Observatório do Valongo, Brazil email: fabiola02@astro.ufrj.br
Gerardo G. B. de Souza
Affiliation:
Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro - Observatório do Valongo, Brazil email: fabiola02@astro.ufrj.br
Heloisa M. Boechat-Roberty
Affiliation:
Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro - Observatório do Valongo, Brazil email: fabiola02@astro.ufrj.br
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Titan, the largest satellite of the planet Saturn, has a thick atmosphere which consists of nitrogen (N2) and methane (CH4). In 2004, the Cassini-Huygens mission observed the occultation of two stars through the atmosphere of Titan and measured ultraviolet (UV) absorption spectra. Through these spectra it was possible to identify the molecular species contained in this environment. In the present work, we have simulated a spectrum of this atmosphere using some molecules such as CH4, C2H2, C2H4, C2H6, C4H2, and C6H6. Our cross sections data were experimentally obtained using the electron energy-loss technique, where the electron energy-loss spectra, measured high incident energies and in small scattering angles, are similar to photoabsorption spectra. The comparison of our synthetic spectrum with that measured by Cassini shows that this method is very efficient for identifying molecules as well as estimating abundances.

Type
Contributed Papers
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2010

References

Boechat-Roberty, H. M., Rocco, M. L. M., Lucas, C. A., Fernandes, M. B., & de Souza, G. G. B. 1997, J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 30, 3369CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boechat-Roberty, H. M., Rocco, M. L. M., Lucas, C. A., & de Souza, G. G. B. 2004, J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 37, 1467CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Souza, G. G. B., Boechat-Roberty, H. M., Rocco, M. L. M., & Lucas, C. A. 2002, J. Electron Spec & Rel Phen. 123, 315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lassetre, E. N. & Skerbele, A. 1974, Methods Exp. Phys. B3, 868Google Scholar
Shemansky, D. E., Stewart, A. I. F., West, R. A., Esposito, L. W., Hallett, J. T., & Liu, X. 2005, Science 308, 978CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, E. H. & Attreya, S. K. 2004, J. Geophys. 109, E06002Google Scholar