Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T02:24:21.474Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Testing the Standard Model of Active Galactic Nuclei through Quasar Variability

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 April 2012

Alessandro Ederoclite
Affiliation:
Instituto de Astrofísica de Canarias, La Laguna, Tenerife, Spain Departamento de Astronomía, Universidad de La Laguna, Spain
Jana Polednikova
Affiliation:
Instituto de Astrofísica de Canarias, La Laguna, Tenerife, Spain Departamento de Astronomía, Universidad de La Laguna, Spain
Jordi Cepa
Affiliation:
Instituto de Astrofísica de Canarias, La Laguna, Tenerife, Spain Departamento de Astronomía, Universidad de La Laguna, Spain
José Antonio de Diego Onsurbe
Affiliation:
Instituto de Astrofísica de Canarias, La Laguna, Tenerife, Spain Instituto de Astronomía, Universidad Nacional Autonoma de México
Ignacio González-Serrano
Affiliation:
Instituto de Física de Cantabria (CSIC- Universidad de Cantabria), Santander, Spain
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The standard model of Active Galactic Nuclei (AGNs) predicts that Type 2 AGNs and Type 1 AGNs only differ in the orientation of a dust torus, which does or does not allow one to observe the central region. If the model is correct, the time-scales and the amplitudes of observed temporal variations should be different between obscured and unobscured objects. In order to test this hypothesis, we started a multi-wavelength (BRIJKs) monitoring campaign of a sample of quasars of both types. Here we present the data and preliminary results of that project.

Type
Contributed Papers
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2012

References

Croom, S. M., et al. , 2001 MNRAS, 322, L29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Croom, S. M., et al. , 2004 MNRAS, 349, 1397CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Croom, S. M., et al. , 2009 MNRAS, 392, 19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Diego, J. A., et al. , 1998, ApJ, 501, 69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rámirez, A., et al. , 2009 AJ, 138, 991CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reyes, R., et al. , 2008 AJ, 136, 2373CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schneider, D. P., et al. , 2010 AJ, 139, 2360CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lal, D. V. & Ho, L. C. 2010 AJ, 139, 1089CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zakamska, N., et al. , 2003 AJ, 126, 2125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zakamska, N., et al. , 2004 AJ, 128, 1002CrossRefGoogle Scholar