Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T08:30:15.796Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Updates on the Ultraviolet Emission from Asymptotic Giant Branch Stars

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 December 2019

Rodolfo Montez Jr.
Affiliation:
Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory, Cambridge, MAUSA email: rodolfo.montez.jr@gmail.com
Sofia Ramstedt
Affiliation:
Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
Joel H. Kastner
Affiliation:
Rochester Institute of Technology, Rochester, NYUSA
Wouter Vlemmings
Affiliation:
Chalmers University of Technology, Onsala Space Observatory, Onsala, Sweden
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

A comprehensive study of UV emission from asymptotic giant branch (AGB) stars with the Galaxy Evolution Explorer (GALEX) revealed that out of the 316 observed AGB stars, 57% were detected in the near-UV (NUV) bandpass and 12% were detected in the far-UV (FUV) bandpass (Montez et al. 2017). A cross-match between our sample and Gaia DR2 results in parallax estimates for 90% of the sample of AGB stars, compared to only 30% from Hipparcos. This increase allowed us to further probe trends and conclusions of our initial study. Specifically, that the detection of UV emission from AGB stars is subject to proximity and favorable lines of sight in our Galaxy. These improved results support the notion that some of the GALEX-detected UV emission is intrinsic to AGB stars, likely due to a combination of photospheric and chromospheric emission.

Type
Contributed Papers
Copyright
© International Astronomical Union 2019 

References

Chiavassa, A., Freytag, B., & Schultheis, M. 2018, A&A, 617, L1 Google Scholar
Collaboration, Gaia 2017, A&A, 605, A79 Google Scholar
Collaboration, Gaia 2016, A&A, 595, A1 Google Scholar
Montez, R. Jr., Ramstedt, S., et al. 2017, ApJ, 841, 33 CrossRefGoogle Scholar