Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T04:09:38.342Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Impact of Viewing Images of Precedents on the Cognitive Process of Architectural Idea Generation

Part of: Collaborative Design

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 July 2019

Chahinez Djari  and
Abdelmalek Arrouf
Chahinez Djari*
Affiliation:
Laboratory of architectural and urban phenomena modeling and studying (LEMPAU); University El Hadj Lakhder, Batna1, Batna, Algeria.
Abdelmalek Arrouf
Affiliation:
Laboratory of architectural and urban phenomena modeling and studying (LEMPAU); University El Hadj Lakhder, Batna1, Batna, Algeria.
*
Contact: Djari, Chahinez, University of Batna 1, architecture and urbanism, Algeria, c.ninez@hotmail.com

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Among the increasing number of researches about design thinking, several studies, empirically investigate the report between design process and different sources of inspiration. Visualization of Images represents one of the most current stimuli in the architectural design.

This work focuses on the link between the active part of design process and images of precedents when visualized by the designer at the beginning of his design activity. It aims to identify and measure the impact of such visualization on the cognitive process of ideation.

We use the protocol analysis method. Data are collected through design experiment and coded by the semio-morphic coding scheme. Results show that the visualization of images of precedents enhances the productivity of the ideation process. The process consistency is also improved by the apearence of homogeneous phases. Moreover the ideation process becomes more creative cognitively, by making the genesis of primitive chains of actions faster, easier and similar.

Accordingly, this paper communicate the effect of a common practice such images’ visualization on the architectural design process to get insight on the cognitive befits of this practice.

Keywords

Design processDesign cognitionVisualisationIdea generationCreativity
Type
Article
Information
Proceedings of the Design Society: International Conference on Engineering Design , Volume 1 , Issue 1 , July 2019 , pp. 209 - 218
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
© The Author(s) 2019

References

Arrouf, A. (2012), “Vers une théorie scientifique de la conception architecturale. Contribution à l’épistémologie architecturale et à la modélisation de l'acte de concevoir”, Editions Universitaires Européennes, Saarinen, Allemagne.Google Scholar
Arrouf, A. and Bensaci, A. (2006), “Modélisation du processus de conception, Etude expérimentale du système compositionnel, instance conception”. Courrier du savoir, Vol. 7 No. Décembre 2006, pp. 67–86.Google Scholar
Boudon, P. (1994), “Enseigner la conception architecturale, cours d'architecturologie”, Savoir-faire pour l'architecture, Edition de la Villette, Paris.Google Scholar
Cai, H., Do, E.Y.L. and Zimring, C.M. (2010), “Extended linkography and distance graph in design evaluation: an empirical study of the dual effects of inspiration sources in creative design”, Design studies, Vol. 31 No. 2, pp. 146–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2009.12.003Google Scholar
Casakin, H. and Goldschmidt, G. (2000), “Reasoning by visual analogy in design problem-solving: the role of guidance”. Journal of Planning and Design in Environment & Planning B, Vol. 27, pp. 105–119. https://doi.org/10.1068/b2565Google Scholar
Dubois, J. (1994), “Lexis, Dictionnaire de la langue française”, Larousse, Paris.Google Scholar
Ericsson, K. A. and Simon, H. A. (1980), “Verbal reports as data”, Psychological Review, Vol. 87 No. 3, pp. 215–251. https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-295x.87.3.215Google Scholar
Finke, R. (1990), Creative imagery: Discoveries and inventions in visualization, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.Google Scholar
Gero, J. , S. and Tang, H-H. (2001), “The differences between retrospective and concurrent protocols in revealing the process-oriented aspects of the design process”, Design Studies, Vol. 21 No. 3, pp. 283–295. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0142-694x(00)00030-2Google Scholar
Goldschmidt, G. (1991), “The Dialectics of sketching”, in Creativity Research Journal, Vol. 4, pp. 123–143. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419109534381Google Scholar
Goldschmidt, G. (1995), “The designer as a team of one”, in Design Studies, Vol. 16 No. 2, pp. 189–209. https://doi.org/10.1016/0142-694x(94)00009-3Google Scholar
Goldschmidt, G. and Dan, T. (2005), “How good are good ideas? Correlates of design creativity”, in Design Studies, Vol. 26, pp. 593–611. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2005.02.004Google Scholar
Goldschmidt, G. and Maria, S. (2006), “Variances in the impact of visual stimuli on design problem solving performance”, in Design Studies, Vol. 27, pp. 549–569. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2006.01.002Google Scholar
Hay, L., Duffy, A.H.B., McTeague, C., Pidgeon, L.M., Vuletic, T. and Grealy, M. (2017), “A systematic review of protocol studies on conceptual design cognition: Design as search and exploration”. Design Science, Vol. 3. https://doi.org/10.1017/dsj.2017.11Google Scholar
Herring, S.R., Chang, C.C., Krantzler, J. and Bailey, B.P. (2009), “Getting inspired!: understanding how and why examples are used in creative design practice”. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 87–96. ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/1518701.1518717Google Scholar
Jansson, D.G. and Smith, S.M. (1991), “Design fixation”, in Design Studies, Vol. 12 No. 1, pp. 3–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/0142-694x(91)90003-fGoogle Scholar
Mc. Neill, T., Gero, J. S. and Warren, J. (1998), “Understanding conceptual electronic design using protocol analysis”. Research in Engineering Design, Vol. 10, pp. 129–140. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01607155Google Scholar
Malaga, R.A. (2000), ‘Effect of stimulus modes and associative distance in individual creativity support systems’, In Decision Support Systems, Vol. 29 No. 2, pp. 125–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-9236(00)00067-1.Google Scholar
Perttula, M. and Sipila, P.(2007), “The idea exposure paradigm in design idea generation”, in Journal of Engineering Design, Vol. 18 No. 1, pp. 93–102. https://doi.org/10.1080/09544820600679679Google Scholar
Sun, G., Yao, S. and Carretero, J.A. (2014), “Comparing Cognitive Efficiency of Experienced and Inexperienced Designers in Conceptual Design Processes”, In Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making, Vol. 8 No. 4, pp. 330–351. http://doi.org/10.1177/1555343414540172.Google Scholar
Suwa, M., Purcell, T. and Gero, J.S. (1998), “Macroscopic Analysis of Design processes based on a scheme for coding designer's cognitive actions”, Design Studies, Vol. 19, pp. 455–483. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0142-694x(98)00016-7Google Scholar
Suwa, M. and Tversky, B. (1997), “What do architects and students perceive in their design sketches? A protocol analysis”, in Design Studies, Vol. 18 No. 4, pp. 385–403. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0142-694x(97)00008-2Google Scholar
Tang, H-H. and Gero, J.S. (2002), “A cognitive method to measure potential creativity in designing”. In Workshop 17, Creative systems: Approaches to creativity in AI and cognitive science, ECAI-02, pp. 47–54.Google Scholar