Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T04:19:23.115Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Observations on the Effects of Skill Transfer through Experience Sharing and In-Person Communication

Part of: Collaborative Design

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 July 2019

Håvard Vestad ,
Carlo Kriesi ,
Kristoffer Slåttsveen  and
Martin Steinert

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

An essential part of any space in which physical prototyping and prototype-driven product development is being conducted is the education of its users in the necessary skills to fully utilise the material resources of the space. This paper describes how two different skills were transferred between five projects in our research laboratory, TrollLABS. Based on the observed skill-transfers in the production of PCBs and use of RF-communication in mechatronics projects certain tendencies emerged: How the use of forced vocal experience sharing; And in-person transferring of skills has impacted the acquired skills of the learner. The observations further show that through the guidance of a more experienced user the learner is able to make “skill-jumps”: Intermediate skill steps, as well as underlying detailed knowledge, are skipped and the learner is able to reach a high skill level in a shorter time than the original acquirer of the skill. Furthermore, skills are retained in the space through cross-generational collaboration and communication. This article aims to share these insights and provide a starting point for answering some of the challenges of modern maker spaces.

Keywords

New product developmentCase studyTrainingMakerspacePrototyping
Type
Article
Information
Proceedings of the Design Society: International Conference on Engineering Design , Volume 1 , Issue 1 , July 2019 , pp. 199 - 208
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
© The Author(s) 2019

References

Benner, P. (1994), “From novice to expert”, in: A Collection of Readings Related to Competency Based Training. Deakin University, Victoria, Australia, pp. 129–137.Google Scholar
Chou, P.-N. (2018), “Skill development and knowledge acquisition cultivated by maker education: Evidence from Arduino-based educational robotics”. EURASIA J Math Sci Technol Educ Vol. 14, pp. 1–9. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/93483Google Scholar
Dow, S.P., Glassco, A., Kass, J., Schwarz, M., Schwartz, D.L. and Klemmer, S.R. (2012), “Parallel Prototyping Leads to Better Design Results, More Divergence, and Increased Self-efficacy”, in: Design Thinking Research, Understanding Innovation. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp. 127–153. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21643-5_8Google Scholar
Dow, S.P., Heddleston, K. and Klemmer, S.R. (2009), “The Efficacy of Prototyping Under Time Constraints”, in: Proceedings of the Seventh ACM Conference on Creativity and Cognition, C&C ’09. ACM, New York, NY, USA, pp. 165–174. https://doi.org/10.1145/1640233.1640260Google Scholar
Eisenhardt, K.M. (1989), “Building theories from case study research”. Acad. Manage. Rev. Vol. 14, pp. 532–550. https://doi.org/10/bpvq6sGoogle Scholar
Eppinger, S. and Ulrich, K. (2011), Product Design and Development, 5th Edition. ed. McGraw/Hill, New York.Google Scholar
Forest, C.R., Moore, R.A., Jariwala, A.S., Fasse, B.B., Linsey, J., Newstetter, W., Ngo, P. and Quintero, C. (2014) “The Invention Studio: A University Maker Space and Culture”. Adv. Eng. Educ. Vol. 4 No. 2.Google Scholar
Gerstenberg, A., Sjöman, H., Reime, T., Abrahamsson, P. and Steinert, M. (2015), “A Simultaneous, Multidisciplinary Development and Design Journey – Reflections on Prototyping”, in: Chorianopoulos, K., Divitini, M., Baalsrud Hauge, J., Jaccheri, L. and Malaka, R. (Eds.), Entertainment Computing - ICEC 2015. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp. 409–416.10.1007/978-3-319-24589-8_33Google Scholar
Jensen, M.B., Semb, C.C.S., Vindal, S. and Steinert, M. (2016), “State of the Art of Makerspaces - Success Criteria When Designing Makerspaces for Norwegian Industrial Companies”. Procedia CIRP, Vol. 54, pp. 65–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2016.05.069Google Scholar
Kelley, D. and Kelley, T. (2013), Creative confidence: Unleashing the creative potential within us all, 1st ed. Crown Publishing Group, New York.Google Scholar
Koedinger, K.R., Kim, J., Jia, J.Z., McLaughlin, E.A. and Bier, N.L. (2015), “Learning is not a spectator sport: Doing is better than watching for learning from a MOOC”, in: Proceedings of the Second (2015) ACM Conference on Learning@ Scale. ACM, pp. 111–120. https://doi.org/10.1145/2724660.2724681Google Scholar
Kriesi, C., Bjelland, Ø. and Steinert, M. (2018), “Fast and iterative prototyping for injection molding–a case study of rapidly prototyping”. Procedia Manuf. Vol. 21, pp. 205–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2018.02.112Google Scholar
Kriesi, C., Blindheim, J., Bjelland, Ø. and Steinert, M. (2016), “Creating Dynamic Requirements through Iteratively Prototyping Critical Functionalities”. Procedia CIRP, Vol. 50, pp. 790–795. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2016.04.122Google Scholar
Leifer, L.J. and Steinert, M. (2011), “Dancing with ambiguity: Causality behavior, design thinking, and triple-loop-learning”. Inf. Knowl. Syst. Manag. pp. 151–173. https://doi.org/10.3233/IKS-2012-0191Google Scholar
Nonaka, I., Toyama, R. and Konno, N. (2000), “SECI, Ba and Leadership: a Unified Model of Dynamic Knowledge Creation”. Long Range Plann. Vol. 33, pp. 5–34. https://doi.org/10/fv4smsGoogle Scholar
Nygaard, T., Kriesi, C., Sjöman, H. and Steinert, M. (2018), “From the Eyes of the Patient – Real Time Gaze Control of Medical Training Mannequins”, in: Proceedings of NordiCHI2018. Presented at the NordiCHI 2018, Oslo, NO. https://doi.org/10.1145/3240167.3240228Google Scholar
Rising, L. and Janoff, N.S. (2000), “he Scrum software development process for small teams”. IEEE Softw. Vol. 17, pp. 26–32. https://doi.org/10.1109/52.854065Google Scholar
Slåttsveen, K., Kriesi, C., Steinert, M. and Aasland, K.E. (2018), “Experiences from a positivistic Way of teaching in the Fuzzy Front End”, in: Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Engineering and Product Design Education (E&PDE18), Design Education, London, United Kingdom, 6th & 7th September 2018. Presented at the International Conference on Engineering and Product Design Education, Design Society, London, pp. 694–699.Google Scholar
Steinert, M. and Leifer, L.J. (2012), “Finding One's Way”: Re-Discovering a Hunter-Gatherer Model based on Wayfaring”. Int. J. Eng. Educ. Vol. 28, p. 251.Google Scholar
Winjum, J., Wulvik, A., Erichsen, J.A.B., Welo, T. and Steinert, M. (2017), “A Heuristic Approach for Early-Stage Product Development in Extreme Environments”. Presented at the International Conference on Engineering, Technology and Innovation (ICE/ITMC), IEEE, Madeira, Portugal, pp. 635–641. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICE.2017.8279942Google Scholar
Yin, R.K. (2013), Case study research: Design and methods, 6th ed. SAGE Publications Inc, Los Angeles.Google Scholar