Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T02:51:07.706Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Further Finds from the Le Câtillon Hoard

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 February 2014

Andrew Fitzpatrick  and
J. V. S. Megaw
Andrew Fitzpatrick
Affiliation:
Department of Archaeology, University of Durham, 46 Saddler Street, Durham DH1 3NU
J. V. S. Megaw
Affiliation:
Discipline of Visual Arts, The Flinders University of South Australia, Bedford Park, South Australia 5042
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Previously unrecorded finds from the Le Câtillon hoard are documented. It is now clear that the hoard was not found in three lots but in a single closed group. The brooches in the hoard suggests a date of c. 40–20 BC rather than during the Caesarian campaigns. The suggestions that the silver brooches in the hoard and others like them are Italian and that most Gallo-Belgic coinage arrived in Britain during the Gallic Wars are reviewed critically.

Type
Research Article
Information
Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society , Volume 53 , Issue 1 , 1987 , pp. 433 - 444
Copyright
Copyright © The Prehistoric Society 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Agostinetti, P. P., 1972. Documenti per la Protostoria della Val d'Ossala. Centro Stud. e Docu. sull'Italia Romana, Monogr. a supp. degli ‘Atti’, 1, Milan.Google Scholar
Allen, D. F., n.d. [1960]. ‘The origins of coinage in Britain: a reappraisal’, in Frere, S. S. (ed.), Problems of the Iron Age in Southern Britain, 97–308. Inst. Archaeol. London Occas. Pap. 11, London (1977, reprint).Google Scholar
Allen, D. F., 1965. ‘Les pièces d'argent minces du comté de Hampshire: nouveau lien entre la Gaule celtique et la Grande-Bretagne’, Rev. Numis. 6 ser., 7, 79–93.Google Scholar
Allen, D. F., 1971. ‘The Sark Hoard’, Archaeologia 103, 1–31.Google Scholar
Almgren, O., 1923. Studien über nordeuropäische Fibelformen der ersten nachchristlichen Jahrhunderte mit Berücksichtigung der provinzialrömischen und südrussichen Formen. Mannus-Bibliothek 32, Würzburg (1973 reprint, Bonn).Google Scholar
Ardsell, R. D. van, 1984. ‘The origin of the British L Stater and “The Problem of the Catuvellauni”’, Numis. Circ. 92, 9–11.Google Scholar
Bianchetti, E., 1895. I sepolcreti di Ornavasso. Atti. Soc. Archeol. e Bella Arti Prov. Torino 6, Turin.Google Scholar
Birchall, A., 1965. ‘The Aylesford-Swarling culture: the problem of the Belgae reconsidered’, Proc. Prehist. Soc. 31, 241–367.Google Scholar
Boon, G. C. and Savory, H. N., 1975. ‘A silver trumpet-brooch with relief decoration, parcel-gilt, from Carmarthen and a note on the development of the type’, Antiq. J. 55, 41–61.Google Scholar
Bradley, R. J., 1985. ‘Exchange and social distance: the structure of bronze artefact distributions’, Man 20, 692–704.Google Scholar
Břeň, J., 1964. ‘Význam spon pro datování keltských oppid v Čechách’, Sborník Národního Muzea v Praze (A), 18 (5), 195–289.Google Scholar
Břeň, J., 1975. ‘Pánve tzv. Aylesfordského typu v Čechách’, Časopis Národního Muzea, Praha 144, 7–15.Google Scholar
Burdo, C., 1957. ‘Discovery of a hoard at Le Cârillon, Grouville’, Soc. Jersiaise Archaeol. Sec. Rep. 1957, 19–20.Google Scholar
Burns, J. E., 1971. ‘Additional torcs from Snettisham, Norfolk’, Proc. Prehist. Soc. 37(1), 228–29.Google Scholar
Cahen-Delhaye, A., 1983. ‘La fin des âges des métaux en Hainaut’, in Cauchies, J.-M. and Duvosquet, J.-M. (eds), Recueil d'études d'histoire Hainuyère offerts à Maurice A. Arnold, 77–94. Mons.Google Scholar
Clarke, R. R., 1954. ‘The Early Iron Age treasure from Snettisham, Norfolk’, Proc. Prehist. Soc. 20, 27–86.Google Scholar
Colbert de Beaulieu, J.-B., 1952. ‘Un monnayage celtique non attribué, isolé dans le nord-est de l'Armorique’, Ann. Bretagne 59, 81–93.Google Scholar
Colbert de Beaulieu, J.-B., 1957a. ‘Le trésor de Jersey-11 et la numismatique celtique des deux Bretagnes’, Rev. Beige Numis. 103, 47–88.Google Scholar
Colbert de Beaulieu, J.-B., 1957b. ‘Trésors de monnaies celtiques de l'île de Jersey et la circulation des monnaies gauloises’, Bull. Soc. Nat. Antiq. France 1957, 86–96.Google Scholar
Colbert de Beaulieu, J.-B., 1958. ‘Armorican coin hoards in the Channel Islands’, Proc. Prehist. Soc. 24, 201–10.Google Scholar
Colbert de Beaulieu, J.-B., 1959. ‘Un troisième lot de la récolte de Jersey-11’, Rev. Belge Numis. 105, 49–57.Google Scholar
Colbert de Beaulieu, J.-B., 1973. Traité de numismatique celtique I: Méthodologie et ensembles. Paris.Google Scholar
Collis, J. R., 1975. Defended Sites of the Late La Tène in Central and Western Europe. Brit. Archaeol. Rep. Supp. Ser. 2, Oxford.Google Scholar
Collis, J. R., 1984. Oppida: earliest towns north of the Alps. Sheffield.Google Scholar
Crivelli, A., 1971. ‘La revisione della necropoli di Giubiasco’, in Oblatio: Raccolta di Studi di antichità ed arte in onore del Prof. Aristide Calderini, 287–309. Soc. Archeol. Comense, Como.Google Scholar
Crivelli, A., 1977. ‘La necropoli di Giubiasco’, Riv. Archaeol. Como 159, 5–70.Google Scholar
Crawford, M. H., 1974. Roman Republican Coinage. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Crawford, M. H., 1985. Coinage and Money Under the Roman Republic. Italy and the Mediterranean Economy. London.Google Scholar
Debord, J., 1981. ‘Découverte d'un nouveau statère du type “British Q” à Villeneuve-Saint-Germain (Aisne)’, Cah. Numis. 69–70, 71–73.Google Scholar
Debord, J., 1985. ‘Un statère anepigraphique des Suessiones découvert à Berzy-Le-Sec (Aisne)’, Rev. Archéol. Picardie 1985(1–2), 21–24.Google Scholar
Dilly, G., 1978. ‘Les fibules gallo-romaines du Musée de Picardie’, Cah. Archéol Picardie 5, 157–75.Google Scholar
Ettlinger, E., 1973. Die römischen Fibeln in der Schweiz. Handb. der Schweiz zur Römer- u. Merowingerzeit, Bern.Google Scholar
Feugère, M., 1985. Les fibules en Gaule méridionale de 120 av. J.-C. à 500 apr. J.-C. Rev. Archéol. Narbonnaise Supp. 12, Paris.Google Scholar
Fischer, F., 1966. ‘Frühe Fibeln aus Aquileia’, Aquilea Nostra 37, col. 7–26.Google Scholar
Fischer, F., 1983. ‘Das Handwerk bei den Kelten zur Zeit der Oppida’, in Jankuhn, J., Janssen, W., Schmidt-Wiegand, R. and Tiefenbach, H. (eds), Das Handwerk in Vor- und Frühgeschichtlicher Zeit. Teil 2: Archäologische und Philologische Beiträge, 34–49. Abhandl. Akad. Wissenschaft. Göttingen, Phil.-Hist. Klasse, Folge 3, No. 123, Göttingen.Google Scholar
Furger-Gunti, A., 1979a. Die Ausgrabungen im Basler Münster I. Die spätkeltische und augusteische Zeit (1. Jahrhundert v. Chr.). Basler Beitr. zur Ur- u. Frühgesch. 6, Derendingen-Solothurn.Google Scholar
Furger-Gunti, A., 1979b. ‘Die Funde aus der spätkeltischen Grube und des frührömischen Spitzgraben’, Basler Zeitschr. Gesch. u. Altkde. 79, 362–87.Google Scholar
Furger-Gunti, A., 1982. ‘Der “Goldfund von Saint Louis” be Basel und ähnliche keltische Schatzfunde’, Zeitschr Schweiz. Archäol. Kunstgesch. 39, 1–47.Google Scholar
Furger-Gunti, A., 1984. Die Helvetier: Kulturgeschichte ein Keltenvolkes. Zürich.Google Scholar
Galliou, P., 1976. ‘Monnaies de la République romaine découvertes ou conservées dans le Finistère’, Archéol. Bretagne 9, 21–24.Google Scholar
Galliou, P., 1983. L'Armorique romaine. Les Bibliophiles de Bretagne, Braspars.Google Scholar
Graue, J., 1974. Die Gräberfelder von Ornavasso. Hamburger Beitr. z. Archäol. Beiheft 1, Hamburg.Google Scholar
Gruel, K., 1981. La trésor de Trébry. Études Numis. Celtiques 1, Paris.Google Scholar
Gruel, K., 1986. ‘Propositions for a relative chronology of the Coriosolitae Coinage (First Century BC)’, in Johnson, P. (ed.), The Archaeology of the Channel Islands, 98–106. Chichester.Google Scholar
Haselgrove, C. C., 1984a. ‘Warfare and its aftermath as reflected in the precious metal coinage of Belgic Gaul’, Oxford J. Archaeol. 3, 81–105.Google Scholar
Haselgrove, C. C., 1984b. ‘“Romanization” before the Conquest: Gaulish precedents and British consequences’, in Blagg, T. F. C. and King, A. C. (eds), Military and Civilian in Roman Britain, 5–63. Brit. Archaeol. Rep. Brit. Ser. 136 Oxford.Google Scholar
Hawkes, J., n.d. [1938]. The Archaeology of the Channel Islands. Vol. II: Bailiwick of Jersey. Jersey.Google Scholar
Jacobi, G., 1974. Werkzeug und Gerät aus dem Oppidum von Manching. Die Ausgrabungen in Manching 5, Wiesbaden.Google Scholar
Kendrick, T. D., 1928. The Archaeology of the Channel Islands. Vol. I: Bailiwick of Guernsey. London.Google Scholar
Kent, J. P. C., 1978. ‘The origins and development of Celtic gold coinage in Britain’, in Actes du Congrès International d'Archéologie: Rouen, 3,4,5, juillet 1975 (= Centenaire l'Abbé Cochet) 313–24. Rouen.Google Scholar
Kent, J. P. C., 1981. ‘The origins of coinage in Britain’, in Cunliffe, B. W. (ed.), Coinage and Society in Britain and Gaul, 40–42. Counc. Brit. Archaeol. Res. Rep. 38, London.Google Scholar
Krämer, W., 1971. ‘Silberne Fibelpaare aus dem letzen vorchristlichen Jahrhundert’, Germania 49, 111–32.Google Scholar
Langouët, L., 1984. ‘Alet and cross-Channel trade’, in Macready, and Thompson, , 1984, 67–77.Google Scholar
Lorenz, K., 1978. ‘Totenbrauchtum und Tracht. Untersuchungen zur regionalen Gliederung in der frühen Latènezeit’, Ber. Röm.-Germ. Komm. 59, 1–380.Google Scholar
Lunz, R., 1981. Archäologie Südtirols. Archäol.-Hist. Forschungen Tirol 7, Calliano.Google Scholar
Mackensen, M., 1974. ‘Die älteste keltische Gold und Silberprägung in England’, Jahrb. Numis. Geldgesch. 1974, 7–63.Google Scholar
Macready, S. and Thompson, F. H. (eds), 1984. Cross-Channel Trade between Gaul and Britain in the pre-Roman Iron Age. Soc. Antiq. London. Occas. Pap. (NS) IV, London.Google Scholar
Maier, F., 1985. ‘Vorbericht über die Ausgrabung 1984 in dem spätkeltische Oppidum von Manching’, Germania 63, 17–55.Google Scholar
Malone, C. and Stoddart, S. (eds), 1985. Papers in Italian Archaeology IV, iii: Patterns in Protohistory. Brit. Archaeol. Rep. Int. Ser. 245, Oxford.Google Scholar
Marinis, R. De, 1977. ‘The La Tène Culture of the Cisalpine Gauls’, in Guštin, M. (ed.), Keltske Študije, 23–50. Posavski Muzej Brežice, Knjiga 4.Google Scholar
Menghin, O., 1937. Die vorgeschichtliche Funde Vorarlbergs. Osterr. Kunsttopographie 27, Vienna.Google Scholar
Menke, M., 1968. ‘Die spätlatènezeitlichen Jochbeschläge aus Karlstein, Ldkr. Berchtesgaden’, Bayer. Vorgeschichtsbl. 33, 58–81.Google Scholar
Nash, D., 1978. ‘Plus ça change…: currency in Central Gaul from Julius Caesar to Nero’, in Carson, R. A. G. and Kraay, C. M. (eds), Scripta Nummaria Romana. Essays presented to Humphrey Sutherland, 1–12. London.Google Scholar
Peschel, K., 1978. Review of Graue 1974. Ethnog.-Archäol. Zeitschr. 19, 559–65.Google Scholar
Polenz, H., 1982. ‘Münzen in latènezeitlichen Gräbern Mitteleuropas aus der Zeit zwischen 300 und 50 v. Chr.’, Bayer. Vorgeschichtsbl. 47, 27–222.Google Scholar
Quinto, R. (ed.) 1978. I Galli e l'Italia. Soprintendenza Archaeol. di Roma, Rome.Google Scholar
Raftery, B., 1984. La Tène in Ireland. Problems of Origin and Chronology. Veröff. Vorgesch. Seminar Marburg Sonderbd. 2, Marburg.Google Scholar
Rieckhoff-Pauli, S., 1981. ‘Der Lauteracher Schatzfund aus archäologischer Sicht’, Numis. Zeitschr. 95, 11–23.Google Scholar
Scheers, S., 1977a. Traité de numismatique celtique II: La Gaule Belgique. Paris.Google Scholar
Scheers, S., 1977b. ‘La circulation des monnaies gauloises sur le territoire trévire’, Bull. Antiq. Luxembourg 8, 25–55.Google Scholar
Schnurbein, S. von, 1979. ‘Eine hölzerne Sica aus dem Römerlager Oberaden’, Germania 57, 117–34.Google Scholar
Schnurbein, S. von, 1981. ‘Untersuchungen zur Geschichte der Militärlager an der Lippe’, Ber. Röm.-Germ. Komm. 62, 5–101.Google Scholar
Sealey, P. R., 1979. ‘The later history of Icenian electrum torcs’, Proc. Prehist. Soc. 45, 165–78.Google Scholar
Sebire, H. A., 1983. ‘Archaeological Section Report for 1983’, Rep. Trans. Soc. Guernesiase 21 (3), 265–67.Google Scholar
Sellwood, L., 1983. ‘The Mount Batten Celtic Coins’, Oxford J. Archaeol. 2, 199–211.Google Scholar
Stead, I. M., 1976. ‘The earliest burials of the Aylesford Culture’, in Sieveking, G. de G., Longworth, I. H. and Wilson, K. E. (eds), Problems in Social and Economic Archaeology, 401–16. London.Google Scholar
Stead, I. M., 1984. ‘Some notes on imported metalwork in Iron Age Britain’, in Macready, and Thompson, 1984, 43–66.Google Scholar
Stöckli, W. E., 1974. ‘Bemerkungen zur räumlichen und zeitlichen Gruppierung der Funde im Oppidum von Manching’, Germania 52, 368–85.Google Scholar
Stöckli, W. E., 1979. Die Grob- und Importkeramik von Manching. Die Ausgrabungen in Manching 8, Wiesbaden.Google Scholar
Tizzoni, M., 1981. ‘La Cultura tardo La Tène in Lombardia’, Studi Archeologici 1, 3–40.Google Scholar
Tizzoni, M., 1985. ‘The Late Iron Age in Lombardy’, in Malone, and Stoddart, 1985, 37–68.Google Scholar
Ulbert, G., 1985. Cáceres el Viejo. Ein spätrepublikanisches Legionslager in Spanisch-Extramadura. Madrider Beitr. 11, Mainz.Google Scholar
Vannacci-Lunazzi, G., 1984. ‘Un aspetto della romanizzazione del territorio: la necropoli di Gambolò-Belcreda (Pavia)’, Riv. Archaeol. Como 165, 199–175.Google Scholar
Vanacci-Lunazzi, G., 1985. ‘Aspetti della cultura tardo La Tène in Lomellina’, in Malone, and Stoddart, 1985, 69–88.Google Scholar
Warner, R. B., n.d. [1982]. ‘The Broighter Hoard: a reappraisal, and the iconography of the collar’, in Scott, B. G. (ed.), Studies on Early Ireland. Essays in Honour of M.V. Duignan, 29–38. [Belfast.]Google Scholar
Werner, J., 1977. ‘Spätlatène-Schwerter norischer Herkunft’, in Chropovský, B. and Dekan, J. (eds), Symposium Ausklang der Latène-Zivilisation und Anfänge der germanischen Besiedlung im mittleren Donaugebiet, 367–401. Bratislava. (Reprinted in Werner, J. (L. Pauli (ed.)) 1979, Spätes Keltentum zwischen Rom und Germanien, 165-97. Münchener Beitr. Vor- u. Frühgesch. Erg.- Bd 2, Munich).Google Scholar
Wightman, E. M., 1974. ‘La Gaule Chevelue entre César et Auguste’, in Pippidi, D. M. (ed.), Actes du IXe congrès international d'études sur les frontières romaines, 473–83. Bucharest/Cologne.Google Scholar