Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T11:29:21.569Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Jeitun: Recent Excavations at an Early Neolithic Site in Southern Turkmenistan

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 February 2014

D.R. Harris
Affiliation:
Institute of Archaeology, University College London, 31–4 Gordon Square, London WC1H 0PY
C. Gosden
Affiliation:
Pitt Rivers Museum, University of Oxford, 64 Banbury Road, Oxford OX2 6PN
M.P. Charles
Affiliation:
Department of Archaeology and Prehistory, University of Sheffield, Sheffield S10 2TN

Abstract

Excavations at the Neolithic site of Jeitun in Turkmenistan, Central Asia, were carried out by a British team between 1991 and 1994 as part of a collaborative project with Soviet and Turkmenian archaeologists. Jeitun was first systematically excavated in the 1950s by Professor V.M. Masson and was shown to be a small settlement of mudbrick houses and ancillary buildings together with yard layers. Our recent excavations have attempted to refine knowledge of the site's stratigraphy and architecture by using fine-grained excavation and recovery techniques and by sampling systematically for sediments, plant and animal remains, and artefacts. We have also obtained the first suite of radiocarbon dates from the site which shows that it was first occupied at c. 6000 cal. BC and may only have remained in use for a few centuries. The excavations have uncovered the lowest architectural phases at Jeitun, as demonstrated by detailed examination of two houses at the northern end of the site. Both houses have a complex history of use, with well laid gypsum floors and intervening layers of sand and mudbrick destruction. Such complexity may indicate that the site was not occupied permanently, although year-round occupation is, on present evidence, equally likely. We tentatively define three phases in the occupation of the site, from ephemeral use in the lowest layers to complex and intensive occupation in the uppermost parts. These phases cannot be separated by the 11 radiocarbon dates obtained, which appear to suggest that activity at the site increased relatively rapidly over a short period of time. Further excavation and analysis is needed to refine and strengthen our conclusions.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Prehistoric Society 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Berezkin, Y.E. 1992. Jeitun excavations during the years 1989–1991: preliminary results. In Masson, V.M., 1992, 1330.Google Scholar
Harris, D.R., Masson, V.M., Berezkin, Y.E., Charles, M.P., Gosden, C, Hillman, G.C.,Kasparov, A.K., Korobkova, G.F., Kurbansakhatov, K., Legge, A.J. & Limbrey, S. 1993. Investigating early agriculture in Central Asia: new research at Jeitun. Antiquity 67, 324–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, D.R. & Gosden, C. 1996. The beginnings of agriculture in western Central Asia. In Harris, D.R. (ed.), The Origins and Spread of Agriculture and Pastoralism in Eurasia, 370–89. London. UCL Press.Google Scholar
Kohl, P. L. 1984. Central Asia: Palaeolithic beginnings to the Iron Age. Paris: Editions Recherche sur les Civilisations, Synthese 14.Google Scholar
Kurbansakhatov, K. 1992. Excavation at the third level of Jeitun. In Masson, V.M., 1992, 30–4.Google Scholar
Legge, A.J. 1992. The exploitation of sheep and goat at Jeitun. In Masson, V.M., 1992, 7783.Google Scholar
Markov, G.E. 1966. Grot Dam Dam Chesme 2 v vostochnom prikaspii. Sovetskaya Arkeologiya 2, 104–25.Google Scholar
Masson, V. M. & Sarianidi, V.I. 1972. Central Asia: Turkmenia before the Achaemenids. London. Thames & Hudson.Google Scholar
Masson, V.M. 1971. The Jeitun Settlement: the emergence of a productive economy. Moscow. Nauka. Materials and Research on the Anthropology of the USSR 180 (in Russian).Google Scholar
Masson, V.M. (ed.) 1992. New Research at the jeitun Settlement (preliminary reports on the work of the Soviet-British expedition). Ashgabat. Academy of Sciences of Turkmenistan (in Russian).Google Scholar
Mellaart, J. 1975. The Neolithic of the Near East. London. Thames & Hudson.Google Scholar
Okladnikov, A.P. 1956. Peschera Djebel – pamyatnik drevnei kul'turi prikaspiskikh Turkmenii. Trudy IuTAKE 7, 11219.Google Scholar
Stuiver, M. & Reimer, P. 1993. Extended I4 C data base and revised CALIB 3.0 14C calibration program. Radiocarbon 35, 215–30.Google Scholar