Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T07:15:10.573Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Landscape, Memory and Material Culture: Interpreting Diversity in the Iron Age

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 February 2014

Helen L. Loney  and
Andrew W. Hoaen
Helen L. Loney
Affiliation:
University of Glasgow, Crichton Campus, Rutherford-McGowan Building, Bankend Road, Dumfries, DG1 4ZLUKh.loney@crichton.gla.ac.uk
Andrew W. Hoaen
Affiliation:
10 Albany Lane, Dumfries, DG1 1JL, UK. awhoaenl@mac.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Landscape studies offer the archaeologist a way to move towards the holistic integration of disparate aspects of research, such as excavation, survey, and specialist analysis. Because landscape perception is socially constructed, like other forms of material culture, it is possible to approach social behaviour in a way which previously was only argued for portable artefacts. Memory studies have allowed historians, anthropologists, and archaeologists to link observable human behaviour with long-term human thought. Memory is also being used as a way of linking the otherwise invisible mind with the material by-products of society, such as monumental architecture. This paper will investigate how two contemporaneous settlements of Late Iron Age peoples, situated on the northern shores of Lake Ullswater, in the Lake District, Cumbria, manipulated their material landscapes as part of the process of transmitting cultural memories. Further, this information will be used in order to find a way of approaching the similarities of their cultural practices with each other and with the wider Iron Age community of Britain.

Résumé

Les études du paysage offrent à l'archéologue un moyen de s'approcher, d'une intégration holistique des aspects disparates de la recherche, tels que les fouilles, la prospection et l'analyse des spécialistes. Parce que la perception du paysage est un construit social, comme les autres formes de culture matérielle, il est possible d'aborder le comportement social d'une manière qui auparavant n'était argumentée que pour des objets portables. Des études de la mémoire ont permis aux historiens, aux anthropologues et aux archéologues d'établir un lien entre le comportement humain observable et la pensée humaine à long terme. La mémoire est également utilisée comme moyen de relier l'esprit, autrement invisible, avec les sousproduits matériels de la société, comme l'architecture monumentale par exemple. Cet article va examiner comment deux occupations contemporaines de peuples de l'âge du fer final, situées sur les rives nord du lac d'Ullswater dans la Région des Lacs, en Cumbria, ont manipulé leurs paysages matériels au cours du procédé de transmission de la mémoire culturelle. De plus, ces renseignements seront utilisés afin de trouver une façon d'aborder les similarités des pratiques culturelles, entre elles, et avec la communauté plus étendue de l'âge du fer en Grande-Bretagne.

Zusammenfassung

Landschaftsstudien bieten dem Archäologen eine Möglichkeit der holistischen Integration ungleichartiger Forschungsbereichen, wie z.B. Ausgrabung, Survey und spezialisierte Analysen. Da Landschaftswahrnehmung, wie auch andere Bestandteile materieller Kultur sozial konstruiert sind, kann man soziales Verhalten in ähnlicher Weise erforschen, wie es bisher nur bei transportierbaren Artefakten unternommen wurde. Studien, die sich mir Erinnerung beschäftigen, haben es Historikern, Kulturanthropologen und Archäologen ermöglicht, beobachtbares menschliches Verhalten mit langfristigem menschlichen Gedanken zu verbinden. Erinnerung wird auch dazu benutzt, den anders nicht sichtbaren Geist mit materiellen Nebenprodukten der Gesellschaft, wie z.B. mit monumentaler Architektur zu verbinden. Dieser Artikel untersucht, wie zwei gleichzeitige Siedlungen der späten Eisenzeit am nördlichen Ufer des Ullswater Sees im Lake Distrikt Cumbria ihre materielle Landschaft in einem Prozess der Weitergabe kulturellerer Erinnerungen beeinflusst haben. Diese Information wird weiterhin dazu benutzt einen Weg zu finden, die Ähnlichkeiten ihrer kulturellen Praktiken miteinander als auch innerhalb der Eisenzeitlichen Gesellschaft Großbritanniens zu untersuchen.

Résumen

Los estudios del paisaje ofrecen al arqueólogo un modo de aproximarse a una interpretación integral de los diversos aspectos de la investigación, como la excavación, prospección, y análisis especializados. Puesto que la percepción del paisaje se construye socialmente, como otras formas de cultura material, es posible enfocar el comportamiento social de un modo previamente utilizado sólo para los objetos portátiles. Estudios sobre la memoria han permitido a historiadores, antropólogos, y arqueólogos unir comportamientos humanos observables al pensamiento humano con proyección de futuro. También se está utilizando la memoria como un modo de unir la mente, de otra manera invisible, con las consecuencias materiales de la sociedad, como por ejemplo la arquitectura monumental. Este trabajo investiga como dos poblados contemporáneos de poblaciones de la Baja Edad del Hierro, situados en la orilla norte del Lago Ullswater, en el Distrito de los Lagos, Cumbria, manipularon sus paisajes materiales como parte del proceso de transmitir memorias culturales. Adicionalmente, esta información se utiliza para abordar las similitudes existentes entre sus prácticas culturales, y entre estas y las del resto de la comunidad de la Edad del Hierro de Gran Bretaña.

Type
Research Article
Information
Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society , Volume 71 , 2005 , pp. 361 - 378
Copyright
Copyright © The Prehistoric Society 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Alcock, S. 2002. The Archaeologies of Memory. Cambridge: University PressGoogle Scholar
Armit, I. & Ralston, I.B.M. 2003. The Iron Age. In Edwards, K.J. & Ralston, I.B.M. (eds), Scotland after the Ice Age: environment, archaeology and history 8000 BC–AD 1000, 179–92. Edinburgh: University PressGoogle Scholar
Ashmore, W. & Knapp, A.B. (eds). 1999. Archaeologies of Landscape: contemporary perspectives. Oxford: BlackwellGoogle Scholar
Ballin Smith, B. 1994. Howe: four millennia of Orkney prehistory excavations, 1978–1982. Edinburgh: Society of Antiquaries of Scotland Monograph 9Google Scholar
Barclay, G.J. 1985. Balfarg. Current Archaeology 9(2), 50–2Google Scholar
Barrett, J.C. 1981. Aspects of the Iron Age in Atlantic Scotland. A case study in the problems of archaeological interpretation. Proceedings of the Antiquaries of Scotland 111, 205–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barrett, J.C. 1994. Fragments from Antiquity: an archaeology of social life in Britain, 2900–1200 BC. Oxford: BlackwellGoogle Scholar
Barrett, J.C. 1999a. Chronologies of landscape. In Ucko, & Layton, (eds), The Archaeology and Anthropology of Landscape, 21–30Google Scholar
Barrett, J.C. 1999b. Mythical landscapes of the British Iron Age. In Ashmore, W. & Knapp, A.B. (eds) 1999, 253–68Google Scholar
Barrett, J.C. 2000. A thesis on agency. In Dobres, M-A & Robb, J.E. (eds), Agency in Archaeology, 61–8. London: RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
Barth, F. 1987. Cosmologies in the Making: a generative approach to cultural variation in inner New Guinea. Cambridge: University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartlett, F.C. 1932. Remembering: a study in experimental and social psychology. Cambridge: University PressGoogle Scholar
Beckensall, S. 2002. Prehistoric Rock Art in Cumbria Oxford: TempusGoogle Scholar
Bender, B. (ed). 1993. Landscape: politics and perspectives. Oxford: BergGoogle Scholar
Bender, B. 2001. Introduction. In Bender, B. & Weiner, M. (eds), Contested Landscapes: movement, exile and place, 1–18. Oxford: BergGoogle Scholar
Bradley, R. 1987. Time regained – the creation of continuity. Journal of the British Archaeological Association 140, 1–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradley, R. 2002. The Past in Prehistoric Societies. London: RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
Bradley, R. 2003a. A life less ordinary: the ritualisation of the domestic sphere in later prehistoric Europe. Cambridge Archaeological Journal 13, 5–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradley, R. 2003b. The translation of time. In van Dyke, & Alcock, (eds) 2003a, 221–7Google Scholar
Brewster, T.C.M. 1963. The Excavation of Staple Howe. Wintringham: East Riding Archaeological Research CommitteeGoogle Scholar
Cherry, J. & Cherry, P.J. 1987. Prehistoric Habitation Sites on the Limestone Uplands of Eastern Cumbria. Cumberland & Westmorland Antiquarian and Archaeological Society Research Series IIGoogle Scholar
Coles, J. 1999. Dancer on the Rock: record and analysis at Jarrestad, Sweden. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 65, 167–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Connerton, P. 1989. How Societies Remember. Cambridge: University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cosgrove, D. 1984. Social Formation and Symbolic Landscape. London: Croom HelmGoogle Scholar
Cree, J.E. 1923. Account of the excavations on Traprain Law during the summer of 1922. Proceedings of the Societies of Antiquaries of Scotland 57, 180–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cree, J.E. 1924. Account of the excavations on Traprain Law during the summer of 1923. Proceedings of the Societies of Antiquaries of Scotland 58, 241–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cummings, V. 2003. Building from memory: remembering the past at Neolithic monuments in western Britain. In Williams, (ed.) 2003, 25–43Google Scholar
Cunliffe, B. 1995. Danebury. An Iron Age hillfort in Hampshire: vol. 6 A hillfort community in perspective. York: Council for British Archaeology Research Report 102Google Scholar
Davis, N.Z. & Starn, R. 1989. Introduction. Representations 26 (Special Issue: Memory and Counter-Memory), 1–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dixon, P.W. 1976. Crickley Hill, 1969–1972. In Harding, D.W. (ed.), Hillforts: later prehistoric earthworks in Britain and Ireland, 161–75. London: AcademicGoogle Scholar
Dobson, J. 1907. Urswick stone walls. Transactions of the Cumberland and Westmorland Antiquarian & Archaeological Society, ns7, 72–94Google Scholar
Dyke, R.M. van 2003. Memory and the construction of Chacoan society. In van Dyke, & Alcock, (eds) 2003a, 180–200Google Scholar
Dyke, R.M. van & Alcock, S.E. (eds). 2003a. Archaeologies of Memory. Oxford: BlackwellCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dyke, R.M. van & Alcock, S.E. 2003b. Archaeologies of memory: an introduction. In van Dyke, & Alcock, (eds) 2003a, 1–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, J.G. 1971. Habitat change on the calcareous soils of Britain: the impact of neolithic man. In Simpson, D.D.A. (ed.), Economy and Settlement in Neolithic and Early Bronze Age Britain and Europe, 27–74. Leicester: University PressGoogle Scholar
Fossati, A. 2002. Landscape representations on boulders and menhirs in the Valcamonica-Valtellina area, Alpine Italy. In Nash, G. & Chippendale, C. (eds), European Landscapes of Rock-Art, 93–115. London: RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
Frachetti, M. & Chippendale, C. 2002. Alpine imagery, Alpine space, Alpine time; and prehistoric human experience. In Nash, G. & Chippendale, C. (eds), European Landscapes of Rock-Art, 116–43. London: RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
Frizt, J. 1978. Palaeopsychology today: ideational systems and human adaptation in prehistory. In Redman, C. (ed.), Social Archaeology: beyond subsistence and dating, 37–60. London: AcademicGoogle Scholar
Goody, J. (ed.). 1968. Literacy in Traditional Societies. Cambridge: University PressGoogle Scholar
Goody, J. 2000. The Power of the Written Tradition. Washington: SmithsonianGoogle Scholar
Gosden, C. 1994. Social Being and Time. Oxford: BlackwellGoogle Scholar
Gosden, C. 1999. Anthropology and Archaeology: a changing relationship. London: RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
Gosden, C. & Lock, G. 1998. Prehistoric histories. World Archaeology 30, 2–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gray, J. 2003. Iconic images: landscape and history in the local poetry of the Scottish Borders. In Stewart, & Strathern, (eds) 2003b, 16–46Google Scholar
Halbwachs, M. 1950. The Collective Memory. New York: Harper and Row (trans. Ditter, F.J. Jr & Ditter, V. Yazdi 1980).Google Scholar
Harding, A.F. 2000. European Societies in the Bronze Age.. Cambridge: University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herzfeld, M. 2004. Whatever happened to ‘influence’? The anxieties of memory. Archaeological Dialogues, 10(2), 191–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hingley, R. 1996. Ancestor and identity in the later prehistory of Atlantic Scotland: the reuse and reinvention of Neolithic monuments and material culture. World Archaeology 28, 231–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hingley, R. 1999. The creation of later prehistoric landscapes and the context of the reuse of Neolithic and earlier Bronze Age monuments in Britain and Ireland. In Bevan, B. (ed.), Northern Exposure: interpretive devolution and the Iron Ages in Britain vol. 4, 233–52, Leicester: Leicester Archaeology MonographGoogle Scholar
Hoaen, A.W. & Loney, H.L. 2003a. Later prehistoric settlement in Matterdale and Hutton parishes. Transactions of the Cumberland & Westmorland Antiquarian and Archaeological Society, 3rd series 3, 51–65Google Scholar
Hoaen, A.W. & Loney, H.L. 2003b. Field survey in Glencoyne Park. Archaeology North 21, 9–11Google Scholar
Hoaen, A.W. & Loney, H.L. 2004. Bronze and Iron Age connections: memory and persistence in Matterdale, Cumbria. Transactions of the Cumberland & Westmorland Antiquarian and Archaeological Society, 3rd series 4, 39–54Google Scholar
Hobsbawm, E. & Ranger, T. 1983. The Invention of Tradition. Cambridge: University PressGoogle Scholar
Hodder, I. 2000. Agency and individuals in long-term processes. In Dobres, M-A & Robb, J. E. (eds), Agency in Archaeology, 21–33. London: RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
Ingold, T. 1993. The temporality of the landscape. World Archaeology 25, 152–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jobey, G. 1962. Iron Age Homestead at West Brandon. Archaeology Aeliona 4th series 40, 1–34Google Scholar
Jobey, G. 1968. Burnswark, hill-fort and Roman works. Discovery and Excavation in Scotland, 20Google Scholar
Jones, A. 2003. Technologies of Remembrance: Memory, materiality and identity in Early Bronze Age Scotland. In Williams, (ed.) 2003, 65–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Küchler, S. 1987. Malangan: art and memory in a Melanesian Society. Man 22, 238–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Küchler, S. 1993. Landscape as memory: the mapping of process and its representation in a Melanesian Society. In Bender, (ed.) 1993, 85–106Google Scholar
Lillios, K.T. 1999. Objects of memory: the ethnography and archaeology of heirlooms. Journal of Archaeological Method & Theory 6, 235–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lillios, K.T. 2003. Creating memory in prehistory: the engraved slate plaques of southwest Iberia. In van Dyke, & Alcock, (eds) 2003a, 129–40Google Scholar
Loney, H.L. & Hoaen, A. W. 2000. Excavations at Baldhowend, Matterdale, 1998: an interim report. Transactions of the Cumberland & Westmorland Antiquarian and Archaeological Society new series 100, 89–103Google Scholar
Lowenthal, D. 1985. The Past is a Foreign Country. Cambridge: University PressGoogle Scholar
Mclean, S. 2003. Céilde Field: natural histories of a buried landscape. In Stewart, & Strathern, (eds) 2003a, 47–71Google Scholar
Nowakoski, J. 2001. Leaving home in the Cornish Bronze Age: insights into planned abandonment processes. In Brück, J. (ed.), Bronze Age Landscapes: traditions and transformation, 139–48. Oxford: OxbowGoogle Scholar
Olivier, L. 2004. The past of the present. Archaeological memory and time. Archaeological Dialogues, 10(2), 204–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parcero Oubina, C., Criado Boado, F. & Santos Estevez, M. 1998. Rewriting landscape: incorporating sacred landscapes into cultural traditions. World Archaeology 30(1), 159–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pauketat, T.R. & Alt, S.M. 2003. Mounds, memory, and contested Mississippian history. In van Dyke, & Alcock, (eds) 2003a, 151–791Google Scholar
Piggott, S. 1950. The excavations at Cairnpapple Hill West Lothian, 1947–8. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Antiquaries of Scotland 82 (1947–48), 68–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quatermaine, J. 1989. Interim results of survey work in Stockdale Moor and Town bank, West Cumbria. Transactions of the Cumberland & Westmorland Antiquarian and Archaeological Society new series 89, 26–31Google Scholar
Quartermaine, J. 2002. Upland survey: Neolithic and Bronze Age site. In Brooks, C.Daniels, R., & Harding, A. (eds), Past, Present and Future: the archaeology of northern England, 29–36. Durham: Architectural & Archaeological Society of Durham and Northumberland Research Report 5Google Scholar
Raftery, B. 1994. Pagan Celtic Ireland: the enigma of the Irish Iron Age. London: Thames & HudsonGoogle Scholar
RCAHME. 1936. An Inventory of the Historical Monuments of Westmorland. Edinburgh: HMSOGoogle Scholar
RCAHMS. 1920. Seventh Report with Inventory of Monuments and Constructions in the County of Dumfries. Edinburgh: Royal Commission on the Ancient & Historical Monuments and Constructions of Scotland 272, 94–101Google Scholar
RCAHMS. 1924. Eighth Report with Inventory of Monuments and Constructions in the County of East Lothian. Edinburgh: Royal Commission on the Ancient & Historical Monuments and Constructions of Scotland 148, 94–9Google Scholar
RCAHMS. 1956. An Inventory of the Ancient and Historical Monuments of Roxburghshire: with the fourteenth report of the Commission. Edinburgh: Royal Commission on the Ancient & Historical Monuments of Scotland 597, 306–10Google Scholar
RCAHMS. 1997. Eastern Dumfriesshire: an archaeological landscape. Edinburgh: HMSOGoogle Scholar
Rowlands, M. 1993. The role of memory in the transmission of culture. World Archaeology 25, 141–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schama, S. 1995. Landscape and Memory. London: HarperCollinsGoogle Scholar
Sharples, N.M. 1991. Maiden Castle: excavations and field survey 1985–6. London: English Heritage Archaeological Report 19Google Scholar
Stewart, P.J. & Strathern, A. 2003a. Introduction. In Stewart, & Strathern, (eds) 2003b, 1–15Google ScholarPubMed
Stewart, P.J. & Strathern, A. (eds). 2003b. Landscape, Memory and History: Anthropological Perspectives. London: PlutoGoogle Scholar
Strathern, A. & Stewart, P.J. 2003. Epilogue. In Stewart, & Strathern, (eds) 2003b, 229–36Google Scholar
Thomas, J. 1993. The politics of vision and the archaeologies of landscape. In Bender, (ed.) 1993, 19–48Google Scholar
Ucko, P.J. & Layton, R. (eds). 1999. The Archaeology and Anthropology of Landscape. London: RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
Webster, R.A. 1971. A morphological study of Romano-British settlements in Westmorland. Transactions of the Cumberland & Westmorland Antiquarian & Archaeological Society new series 71, 64–74Google Scholar
Whitehouse, H. 1992. Memorable religions: transmission, codification, and change in divergent Melanesian contexts. Man new series 27(3), 777–97Google Scholar
Whittle, A. 1985. Neolithic Europe: a survey. Cambridge: University PressGoogle Scholar
Williams, H. (eds). 2003. Archaeologies of Remembrance: death and memory in past societies. New York: Kluwer Academic/PlenumCrossRefGoogle Scholar