No CrossRef data available.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 01 January 1980
Since the launching of the first commercial computer by the American firm of Remington Rand in 1951 the world has witnessed a technological revolution of a significance which may be compared with the invention of the wheel. In recent years the escalation of manufacturing activity in this sphere has fuelled a fierce controversy over the sociological implications of a world increasingly dominated by the powers of automation. Attitudes towards computing and the arts have also tended to polarize around two points of view, one in favour of exploring the creative benefits of such a marrying of disciplines, the other firmly opposed to any further encroachment of scientific principles into the cultural spheres of human expression. The fears which give rise to the latter attitude have been fermented to a considerable extent by a natural suspicion of the unknown, and it is the purpose of this paper to identify and examine at least some of the areas of music to which the processes of computation have been applied, with particular regard to the benefits or otherwise which have accrued from such ventures.
1 I. Bent and J. Morehen, ‘Computers in the Analysis of Music’ Proceedings of the Royal Musical Association, civ (1977–78), 30–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2 Erickson, R., DARMS: a Reference Manual (typescript, Queens College, City University of New - York, 1976).Google Scholar
3 C. E. Shannon and W. Weaver, The Mathematical Theory of Communication (University of Illinois Press, 1949).Google Scholar
4 H. F. Olson and H. Belar, ‘Aid to Musical Composition Employing a Random Probability System’, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, xxxiii (1961), 1163–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5 H. F. Olson and H. Belar, ‘Electronic Music Synthesizer’, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, xxvii (1955), 595–612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6 H. F. Olson and H. Belar, ‘Electronic Music Synthesis’, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, xxxii (1960), 311–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7 Schaeffer, P., A la recherche d'une musique concrète (Editions du Seuil, Paris, 1952), 203–28.Google Scholar
8 Schaeffer, P., Traité des objets musicaux (Editions du Seuil, Paris, 1966).Google Scholar
9 J. Gabura and G. Ciamaga, ‘Digital Computer Control of Sound Generating Apparatus for the Production of Electronic Music’, Electronic Music Review, 1 (1967), 54–7.Google Scholar
10 M. V. Mathews and F. R. Moore, ‘GROOVE – a Program to Compose, Store, and Edit Functions of Time’, Communnications of the Association for Computing Machinery, xiii (1970), 715–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11 Zinovieff, P., D. Cockerell, and P. Grogono, MUSYS: a Reference Manual (E.M.S., London and the Arts Council of Great Britain, 1970).Google Scholar
12 Xenakis, I., Formalised Music (University of Indiana Press, 1971).Google Scholar
13 Koenig, G. M., ‘Project 1’, Electronic Music Reports, ii (Utrecht Institute of Sonology, 1970), 32–44.Google Scholar
14 Koenig, G. M., ‘Project 2, a Programme for Musical Composition’, Electronic Music Reports, iii (Utrecht Institute of Sonology, 1970).Google Scholar
15 Truax, B., ‘The Computer Composition – Sound Synthesis Programs POD4, POD5, and POD6’, Sonological Reports 2 (Utrecht Institute of Sonology, 1973).Google Scholar
16 W. Kaegi and S. Tempelaars, ‘VOSIM – a New Sound Synthesis System’, Journal of the Audio Engineering Society, xxvi (1978), 418–25.Google Scholar
17 Buxton, W., ‘Design Issues in the Foundation of a Computer-based Tool for Music Composition’, Technical Report CSRG–97 (Computer Systems Research Group, University of Toronto, 1978).Google Scholar