Published online by Cambridge University Press: 01 January 1984
In 1892 Bernard Bosanquet wrote:
As the true value of German idealism in general philosophy was never understood, till the genius of English naturalists had revolutionised our conception of the organic world, so the spirit of German aesthetic will not be appreciated until the work of its founders shall have been renewed by the direct appreciative sense of English art and criticism.
As a Hegelian, Bosanquet had every reason to believe in the strength of the German idealist tradition, even if its supremacy was seriously challenged in the second half of the nineteenth century; as an Englishman, and brought up in the English philosophical tradition, he was fully aware of the important British contribution to both speculative and experimental psychology. However, bringing various intellectual and philosophical traditions together is no easy task and we can witness a continuing division in the orientation of many scholars who, although not philosophers themselves, felt the need to strengthen their critical theories with ideas which originated in the domain of philosophy.
1 Bernard Bosanquet, A History of Aesthetic (London, 1892, 2nd edn., 1904), 440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2 Friedrich Nietzsche, Menschliches, Allzumenschliches, II/ii, §94.Google Scholar
3 Carl Stumpf, ‘Musikpsychologie in England’, Vierteljahrsschrift für Musikwissmschaft, i (1885), 261.Google Scholar
4 Charles Darwin, The Descent of Man (London, 1871).Google Scholar
5 Herbert Spencer, ‘The Origin and Function of Music’, first published in Fraser's Magazine in 1857, later included in Essays: Scientific, Political and Speculative.Google Scholar
6 Hippolyte Taine, The Philosophy of Art (English transl., London, 1865), 69.Google Scholar
7 Ibid.Google Scholar
8 August Wilhelm Ambros, Die Grenzen der Musik und Poesie. Eine Studie zur Ãsthetik der Tonkunst (Leipzig, 1856).Google Scholar
9 Charles Beauquier, Philosophie de la musique (Paris, 1865).Google Scholar
10 Jules Combarieu, Les rapports de la musique et de la poésie (Paris, 1894).Google Scholar
11 Friedrich Nietzsche, Menschliches, Allzumenchliches, I, §215.Google Scholar
12 Carl Stumpf, ‘Musikpsychologie in England’, 288.Google Scholar
13 For an assessment of Sully as a psychologist see Edwin G. Boring, A History of Experimental Psychology (New York, 1929, 2nd edn., 1950), 467–8.Google Scholar
14 James Sully, Sensation and Intuition (London, 1874), 288.Google Scholar
15 Ibid., 228–9.Google Scholar
16 Ibid., 196.Google Scholar
17 Ibid., 218.Google Scholar
18 Ibid., 197.Google Scholar
19 Ibid., 218.Google Scholar
20 Ibid., 338.Google Scholar
21 Published in Mind, v (1881), 270–8.Google Scholar
22 The question of obsolescence is, indeed, explicitly discussed by Schoenberg. See ‘Problems of Harmony’ in Style and Idea. Selected Writings of Arnold Schoenberg, ed. Leonard Stein (London, 1975), 269.Google Scholar
23 Edmund Gurney, The Power of Sound (London, 1880), 194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
24 Ibid., 174.Google Scholar
25 Ibid., 208.Google Scholar
26 Ibid., 96.Google Scholar
27 Ibid., 248.Google Scholar
28 Ibid., 160.Google Scholar
29 Ibid., 214.Google Scholar
30 See Tovey, D.F., Essays in Musical Analysis: Symphonies and other Orchestral Works (new edn., London, 1981), 96.Google Scholar
31 Gurney, The Power of Sound, 229.Google Scholar
32 Ibid., 4. See also Grant Allen, Physiological Aesthetics (London, 1877), 129.Google Scholar
33 Herbert Spencer, Principles of Psychology, ii, §539 (quoted after 4th edn., London, 1899, 710).Google Scholar
34 Christopher Wintle, ‘“Humpty Dumpty's Complaint”: Tovey Revalued’, Soundings, xi (1983–84), 25, 28.Google Scholar
35 Roger Scruon, The Aesthetic Understanding (London, 1983), 34.Google Scholar
36 William J. Gatens, ‘Fundamentals of Musical Criticism in the Writings of Edmund Gurney and his Contemporaries’, Music and Letters, lxiii (1982), 18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
37 Eduard Hanslick, The Beautiful in Music, transl. G. Cohen (Indianapolis and New York, 1957), 56.Google Scholar
38 Hanslick's original wording: ‘Ist es einmal in die Phantasie des Künstlers gefallen …’ suggests literally a descent, but the point is lost in Cohen's translation: ‘When once it has taken root in the composer's imagination…’. See Hanslick, transl. Cohen, ibid., 52.Google Scholar
39 Anton Ehrenzweig, “The Hidden Order in Art', The British Journal of Aesthetics, i (1960–61), 129.Google Scholar
40 Johann Friedrich Herbart, Psychologie als Wissenschaft, §152, quoted after Michael Podro, The Manifold in Perception (Oxford, 1972), 79.Google Scholar
41 Edmund Husserl, ‘Einleitung zur Vorlesung über phänomenologische Psychologie’, Materialen zur Philosophie Wilhelm Diltheys, ed. F. Rodi and H.-U. Lessing (Frankfurt, 1984), 154.Google Scholar
42 Ibid., 150.Google Scholar
43 The fragment forms a part of a composite work, Der Aufbau der geschichtlichen Welt in den Geisteswissenschaften, ed. B. Groethuysen, in Wilhelm Diltheys Gesammelte Schriften, vii (Leipzig and Berlin, 1927), 220–24.Google Scholar
44 Ibid., 221–22 and 223. English translation by Martin Cooper, prepared for the forthcoming Music in European Thought 1851–1912, to be published by Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
45 Guido Adler, ‘Umfang, Ziel und Methode der Musikwissenschaft’ Vierteljahrsschrift für Musikwissenschaft, i (1885), 16–17.Google Scholar
46 ‘Richard, do not get so worked up.’ See Adler, Guido, Wollen und Wirken (Vienna, 1935), 15–16.Google Scholar
47 See Boulez on Music Today, transl. S. Bradshaw and R. Rodney Bennett (London, 1971), 44–46, and Carl Stumpf, Tonpsychologie (Leipzig, 1883), i, 136.Google Scholar
48 Stumpf, ibid., 182.Google Scholar