Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T23:48:04.134Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Effects of the Thomas Appointment to the Supreme Court

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2013

Karen O'Connor
Karen O'Connor*
Affiliation:
Emory University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In announcing his nomination of Clarence Thomas to the United States Supreme Court on July 2, 1991, George Bush described him as “a fiercely independent thinker with an excellent legal mind,” and proclaimed his belief that Thomas would “be a great Justice.” While many legal and political commentators had predicted that Clarence Thomas stood an excellent chance of being Bush's nominee to replace the retiring Thurgood Marshall, few were quick to echo Bush's assessment that Thomas was:

… the best qualified at this time …. Clarence Thomas … fits my description of the best man at the right time. … I kept my word to the American people and to the Senate by picking the best man for the job on the merits. (New York Times, 2 July 1991)

Even as Bush offered Thomas's name in nomination, the skeptics were muttering about the hyperbole that surrounded the announcement. Thomas's total lack of courtroom experience and his generally undistinguished record as a jurist led many to question his qualifications to serve on the High Court. Concern with his general absence of legal credentials prompted the American Bar Association's Standing Committee on the Federal Judiciary to rate Thomas merely as “Qualified”—making him the only nominee with such a low rating to serve on the Supreme Court.

The authority and prestige of the United States Supreme Court have always rested on its support from the other branches of government and, perhaps even more importantly, on the support of the American public.

Type
Research Article
Information
PS: Political Science & Politics , Volume 25 , Issue 3 , September 1992 , pp. 492 - 495
Copyright
Copyright © The American Political Science Association 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Cohen, Richard. 1991. “What's Clarence Thomas Doing in People Magazine?” Washington Post, 12 November.Google Scholar
CQ Guide to Current American Government. 1991. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly, Inc. Google Scholar
“Hearings Turn Off Judges.” 1991. The National Law Journal, 28 October, p. 1.Google Scholar
Marcus, Ruth. 1992. “Early Returns Show Justice Thomas as Advertised: Conservative.” The Washington Post, 1 March.Google Scholar
Mauro, Tony. 1992. “Starry Indecisis: Law's Brightest Lights Don't Always Shine under the Glare of Public Scrutiny.” The Recorder, 7 January.Google Scholar
New York Times. July 2, 1991. LEXIS.Google Scholar
O'Brien, David M. 1992. “Holding the Center: As Thomas and Scalia Stake Out the Far Right, O'Connor Takes the Moral High Ground.” Los Angeles Times, 8 March.Google Scholar