Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-5r2nc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-13T21:45:24.903Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Field Research Methods in the Middle East

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 July 2006

Janine A. Clark
Janine A. Clark
Affiliation:
University of Guelph
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In recent years, a growing chorus of voices in the political science discipline has become concerned with the balance among alternative methodological approaches in empirical research and publications. Accordingly, these scholars have issued a call to further develop and refine rigorous methods for qualitative studies, in contrast to studies that rely on quantitative methods and formal modeling (Bennett, Barth, and Rutherford 2003; Yanow 2003; George and Bennett 2005). My own interest and reason for conducting the following survey is rooted in the observation, even frustration, that the literature on qualitative research methods largely focuses on democratic and not on authoritarian regimes or the Middle East in particular. Research in the Middle East is clearly essential and has received increased attention since the terrorist attacks of 9-11, but given how critical this work is and will continue to be in coming years, what are the challenges? Do qualitative methodological tools need to be adapted for research in the Middle East? And, if so, how?The author would like to thank Anna Szczurk for her help in designing the survey and the contributors to the symposium and Melissa Gabler for their help in the research and writing of the article. The author also is grateful to the survey respondents for the time and effort they devoted to answering the questions.

Type
SYMPOSIUM
Information
PS: Political Science & Politics , Volume 39 , Issue 3 , July 2006 , pp. 417 - 424
Copyright
© 2006 The American Political Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Atkinson, R., and John Flint. 2001. “Accessing Hidden and Hard-to-Reach Populations: Snowball Research Strategies.” Social Research Update 33 (summer).Google Scholar
Barnett, C., and J. Cason. 1997. Overseas Research. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Bennett, Andrew, Aharon Barth, and Kenneth R. Rutherford. 2003. “Do We Preach What We Practice?” PS: Political Science and Politics 36 (July): 373–378.Google Scholar
Berg, B. 2004. Qualitative Research Methods, 5th edition. USA: Pearson Education, Inc.Google Scholar
Bernard, H. 2000. Social Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. London: Sage Publications, Inc.Google Scholar
George, A., and Andrew Bennett. 2005. Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Rivera, Sharon Werning, Polina M. Kozyreva, and Eduard G. Sarovskii. 2002. “Interviewing Political Elites: Lessons from Russia.” PS: Political Science and Politics 35 (December): 683–688.Google Scholar
Yanow, Dvora. 2003. “Practicing Discipline.” PS: Political Science and Politics 36 (July): 397–399.Google Scholar