Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T01:36:38.110Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Liberty of the Church and the Road to Runnymede: John of Salisbury and the Intellectual Foundations of the Magna Carta

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 June 2010

Cary J. Nederman
Cary J. Nederman
Affiliation:
Texas A&M University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Scholars generally agree that the Magna Carta of 1215 was a watershed in Western (and, more specifically, English) legal and political history and thought. Beyond this simple statement, however, there is little consensus concerning the nature and significance of the Magna Carta's achievement. One central unresolved issue centers on whether the charter represents a principled defense of human liberty or instead reflects a pragmatic statement of baronial liberties. The dispute over this question is nontrivial and reflects much more than a matter of language. If one subscribes to the former belief, which received its classic articulation in the seventeenth century (Turner 2003, 145–82) and retains powerful resonance today (Linebaugh 2008), then the Magna Carta deserves to be accorded a foundational role in the intellectual and political history of the liberal-democratic constitutional tradition, in which the rule of law is deemed the basis for the protection of individual freedom. If, however, one adopts the viewpoint of “the modern historian” that the charter “is a statement of [specific] liberties rather than an assertion of [general] liberty,” then the document should be read narrowly as an interesting artifact stipulating elite “privileges” that were “devised mainly in the interests of the aristocracy” (Holt 1965, 4). In other words, either the Magna Carta reflects deeper philosophical doctrines and commitments that enjoy purchase beyond their specific time and place, or it represents an expression of the immediate demands and grievances of a specific class displeased with the conduct of King John's government.

Type
Symposium
Information
PS: Political Science & Politics , Volume 43 , Issue 3 , July 2010 , pp. 457 - 461
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baldwin, John. 2008. “Master Stephen Langton, Future Archbishop of Canterbury: The Paris Schools and Magna Carta.” English Historical Review 122: 811–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berman, Harold J. 1983. Law and Revolution: The Formation of the Western Legal Tradition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Bollermann, Karen, and Nederman, Cary J.. 2008. “King Stephen, the English Church, and a Female Mystic: Christina of Markyate's Vita as a Neglected Source for the Council of Winchester (August 1139) and Its Aftermath.” Journal of Medieval History 34: 433–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bollermann, Karen, and Nederman, Cary J.. 2009. “John of Salisbury's Second Letter Collection in Later Medieval England: Unexamined Fragments from Huntington Library HM 128.” Viator: Medieval and Renaissance Studies 40: 71–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fryde, Natalie. 2001. Why Magna Carta? Angevin England Revisited. Muenster, Germany: LIT Verlag.Google Scholar
Holt, J. C. 1961. The Northerners. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Holt, J. C. 1965. Magna Carta. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Holt, J. C. 1972. Magna Carta and the Idea of Liberty. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Holt, J. C. 1985. Magna Carta and Medieval Government. London: Hambleton Press.Google Scholar
Howard, A. E. Dick. 1964. Magna Carta: Text and Commentary. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press.Google Scholar
John of Salisbury. 1909. Policraticus. Ed. Webb, C.J.. 2 vols. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
John of Salisbury. 1927. The Statesman's Book. Trans. Dickinson, John. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
John of Salisbury. 1938. Frivolities of Courtiers and Footprints of Philosophers. Trans. Pike, J. B.. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
John of Salisbury. 1955. The Letters of John of Salisbury, Volume One: The Early Letters (1153–1161). Ed. Millor, W. J. S. J., and Butler, H.E., rev. Brooke, C. N. L.. London: Thomas Nelson and Sons.Google Scholar
John of Salisbury. 1979. The Letters of John of Salisbury, Volume Two: The Late Letters (1163–1180). Ed. Millor, W. J. S. J. and Brooke, C. N. L.. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
John of Salisbury. 1990. Policraticus. Trans. Nederman, Cary J.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
John of Salisbury. 2009. Anselm and Becket: Two Canterbury Saints' Lives. Trans. Pepin, Ronald E.. Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Medieval Studies.Google Scholar
Jones, J. A. P. 1971. King John and Magna Carta. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Linder, Amnon. 1977a. “John of Salisbury's Policraticus in Thirteenth Century England: The Evidence of Ms Cambridge Corpus Christi College 469.” Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes 40: 276–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Linder, Amnon. 1977b. “The Knowledge of John of Salisbury in the Late Middle Ages.” Studi Medievali 18: 315–66.Google Scholar
Linebaugh, Peter. 2008. The Magna Carta Manifesto: Liberties and Commons for All. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKechnie, William S. 1914. Magna Carta: A Commentary on the Great Charter of King John. 2nd ed. Glasgow: J. Maclehose and Sons.Google Scholar
Nederman, Cary J. 2003. “The Origins of ‘Policy’: Fiscal Administration and Economic Principles in Later Twelfth-Century England.” In Rhetoric and Renewal in the Latin West 1100–1500: Essays Presented to John O. Ward, ed. Mews, Constant J., Nederman, Cary J., and Thomson, Rodney, 149–68. Turnhout, Belgium: Brepols.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nederman, Cary J. 2005. John of Salisbury. Tempe, AZ: Arizona Center for Medieval and Renaissance Studies.Google Scholar
Powicke, F. M. 1928. Stephen Langton. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stephenson, Carl, and Marcham, Frederick G., eds. 1972. Sources of English Constitutional History. 1. Rev. ed. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Turner, Ralph V. 2003. Magna Carta through the Ages. Harlow: Pearson/Longman.Google Scholar
Turner, Ralph V. 2009. John King: England's Evil King? 2nd ed. Stroud: History Press.Google Scholar