We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Type
Structuring Inclusion into Political Science Recruiting, Progression, and Engagement
Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)
References
REFERENCES
Anderson, Margo, and Fienberg, Stephen E.. 1999. Who Counts?New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Ben-Nun, Pazit. 2008. “Respondent Fatigue.” In Encyclopedia of Survey Research Methods, ed. Lavrakas, Paul J., pp. 742–43. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Csata, Zsombor, Hlatky, Roman, and Liu, Amy H.. 2021. “How to Head Count Ethnic Minorities.” East European Politics37 (3): 572–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaines, Brian J., Kuklinski, James H., and Quirk, Paul J.. 2007. “The Logic of the Survey Experiment Reexamined.” Political Analysis15 (1): 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hawkesworth, Mary. 2003. “Congressional Enactments of Race-Gender.” American Political Science Review97 (4): 529–50.Google Scholar
O’Meara, Kerryann, Culpepper, Dawn, Misra, Joya, and Jaeger, Audrey. 2021. Equity-Minded Faculty Workloads. Washington, DC: American Council on Education.Google Scholar
Parkin, Michael. 2008. “Priming.” In Encyclopedia of Survey Research Methods, ed. Lavrakas, Paul J., pp. 611–12. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Tourangeau, Roger, Rips, Lance J., and Rasinski, Kenneth. 2000. The Psychology of Survey Response. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar