Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T23:48:48.869Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Political Economy and Militarism

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2013

Michael J. Kinnucan
Michael J. Kinnucan*
Affiliation:
San Francisco State University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Shortly after the demolition of the Berlin Wall, PS: Political Science & Politics published an article, “Socialism and Militarism,” which purported to demonstrate a positive causal relationship between socialism and militarism. Authors Thomas R. Dye and Harmon Zeigler (1989, 801) presented data and analysis leading them to conclude that “militarism is a much more pervasive characteristic of socialist nations than capitalist nations.” This finding is supportive of Payne (1989, 110) who, in Why Nations Arm stated, “the Marxist regimes are considerably more militaristic [than non-Marxist countries].”

For their examination Dye and Zeigler employed the resource allocation measures of military spending as a percentage of gross national product and the number of military personnel per 1000 population as indicators of militarism, and the classification system of Gastil (cited in Dye and Zeigler 1989) in defining national political economy types. Using this information Dye and Zeigler generated four tables that ostensibly demonstrate that socialist countries are more militaristic than capitalist countries. It is arguable, however, that Dye and Zeigler's conclusions are dubious because of the definitions and measures they have chosen to use for both socialism and militarism.

Type
Research Article
Information
PS: Political Science & Politics , Volume 25 , Issue 3 , September 1992 , pp. 506 - 516
Copyright
Copyright © The American Political Science Association 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Clausewitz, Carl von. 1968 [1908]. On War. Rapoport, Anatol, ed. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
Donovan, Col. James A. 1970. Militarism U.S.A. New York: Scribners.Google Scholar
Dye, Thomas R. and Zeigler, Harmon. 1989. “Socialism and Militarism.” PS: Political Science & Politics 22: 800–13.Google Scholar
Dye, Thomas R. and Zeigler, Harmon. 1990. “Socialism and Militarism: Confronting Ideology with Evidence.” PS: Political Science & Politics 23: 583–84.Google Scholar
Hahnel, Robin and Albert, Michael. 1960. “Revolution in the East.” Z Magazine, April: 60.Google Scholar
Payne, James L. 1989. Why Nations Arm. New York: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Sivard, Ruth Leger. 1989. World Military and Social Expenditures. Washington, DC: World Priorities.Google Scholar