Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-cphqk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-15T14:51:21.807Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Calamitous Compact

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 October 2016

Darin DeWitt  and
Thomas Schwartz
Darin DeWitt
Affiliation:
California State University, Long Beach
Thomas Schwartz
Affiliation:
University of California, Los Angeles
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The National Popular Vote Interstate Compact (joined so far by ten states and DC) would replace the current presidential-election system, based on the electoral college and the winner-take-all rule, with nationwide plurality rule, and it would do so by changes in state law, not a Constitutional amendment. The mischief that would create (especially procedural instability, noncompliant electors, nation-wide recounts, vote manipulation, and narrowed support), the compact’s questionable Constitutionality, the weakness of its defense, and the availability of less calamitous alternatives are reasons enough to reject it.

Type
Controversy: The National Popular Vote Plan
Information
PS: Political Science & Politics , Volume 49 , Special Issue 4: Elections in Focus , October 2016 , pp. 791 - 796
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Amar, Akhil Reed and Amar, Vikram David. 2001. “How To Achieve Direct National Election of the President Without Amending the Constitution.” FindLaw’s Writ. Web. http://writ.news.findlaw.com/amar/20011228.html Google Scholar
Gaines, Brian J. 2001. “Popular Myths About Popular Vote-Electoral College Splits.” PS: Political Science & Politics 34 (1): 71–75.Google Scholar
Hertzberg, Hendrik. 2007. “Why Votescam Can’t Scale Up.” The New Yorker, October 23. http://www.newyorker.com/news/hendrik-hertzberg/why-votescam-cant-scale-up Google Scholar
Hertzberg, Hendrik. 2010. “N.P.V. and the G.O.P.” The New Yorker, July 28. http://www.newyorker.com/news/hendrik-hertzberg/n-p-v-and-the-g-o-p Google Scholar
Imai, Kosuke and King, Gary. 2004. “Did Illegal Overseas Absentee Ballots Decide the 2000 U.S. Presidential Election?” Perspectives on Politics 2 (3): 537–549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kimball, David C., Kropf, Martha, and Battles, Lindsay. 2006. “Helping America Vote? Election Administration, Partisanship, and Provisional Voting in the 2004 Election.” Election Law Journal 5 (4): 447–461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koza, John R., Fadem, Barry F., Grueskin, Mark, Mandell, Michael S., Richie, Robert, and Zimmerman, Joseph F.. 2013. Every Vote Equal, 4th Edition. Los Altos, CA: National Popular Vote Press.Google Scholar
Longley, Lawrence D. and Peirce, Neal R.. 1999. The Electoral College Primer 2000. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Ray v. Blair , 343 U.S. 154 (1952).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stuart, Guy. 2004. “Databases, Felons, and Voting: Bias and Partisanship of the Florida Felons List in the 2000 Elections.” Political Science Quarterly 119 (3): 453–475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Virginia v. Tennessee , 148 US 503 (1893).Google Scholar