Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-mzp66 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-15T00:19:59.115Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Collaborating on Research with Undergraduate Students: A Comparative Institutional-Racial Analysis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 October 2022

Maruice Mangum Open the ORCID record for Maruice Mangum [Opens in a new window]
Maruice Mangum*
Affiliation:
Jackson State University, USA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article describes my experiences in collaborating with undergraduate students on research projects, including published works in peer-reviewed outlets. The article discusses the courses and assignments that engendered the collaborations and compares the institutions and students. By describing several significant similarities and differences, I compare and contrast white students in The Midwest at Predominantly White Institutions with African American students at Historically Black Colleges and Universities in The South.

Type
Article
Information
PS: Political Science & Politics , Volume 56 , Issue 1 , January 2023 , pp. 150 - 153
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the American Political Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Boyer Commission on Education of Undergraduates in the Research University. 1998. Reinventing Undergraduate Education: A Blueprint for America’s Research Universities. Stony Brook, NY: State University of New York.Google Scholar
Stephens, Nicole, Fryberg, Stephanie, Markus, Hazel, Johnson, Camille, and Covarrubias, Rebecca. 2012. “Unseen Disadvantage: How American Universities’ Focus on Independence Undermines the Academic Performance of First-Generation College Students.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 102 (6): 1178–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar