No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
The Democratic Dilemma: Taking the Dilemma out of Democracy
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 08 July 2019
Abstract
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Symposium: Can Citizens Learn What They Need to Know? Reflections on The Democratic Dilemma
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © American Political Science Association 2019
References
REFERENCES
Bawn, Kathleen, Cohen, Martin, Karol, David, Masket, Seth, Noel, Hans, and Zaller, John. 2012. “A Theory of Political Parties: Groups, Policy Demands and Nominations in American Politics.” Perspectives on Politics 10: 571–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bawn, Kathleen, and Rosenbluth, Frances. 2006. “Short Versus Long Coalitions: Electoral Accountability and the Size of the Public Sector.” American Journal of Political Science 50 (2): 251–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bullock, John G. 2011. “Elite Influence on Public Opinion in an Informed Electorate.” American Political Science Review 105: 496–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bullock, John G., Gerber, Alan, Hill, Seth, and Huber, Gregory. 2015. “Partisan Bias in Factual Beliefs about Politics.” Quarterly Journal of Political Science 10: 519–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carey, John, and Shugart, Matthew. 1995. “Incentives to Cultivate a Personal Vote: A Rank Ordering of Electoral Formulas.” Electoral Studies 14 (4): 417–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Druckman, James. 2019. “The Democratic Dilemma Then and Now.” PS: Political Science & Politics 52 (4): this issue.Google Scholar
Druckman, James, Fein, Jordan, and Leeper, Thomas. 2012. “A Source of Bias in Public Opinion Stability.” American Political Science Review 106 (2): 430–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferejohn, John. 1993. “The Spatial Model and Elections.” In Information, Participation, and Choice, ed. Grofman, Bernard, 107–124. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Glaeser, Edward, and Sunstein, Cass. 2014. “Does More Speech Correct Falsehoods?” Journal of Legal Studies 43 (1): 65–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grofman, Bernard. 2017. “Political Choices in One Dimension.” In Oxford Handbook of Public Choice, ed. Winer, Stanley, Voigt, Stefan, and Grofman, Bernard, Chapter 8. Oxford: Oxford University Press. http://www.socsci.uci.edu/~bgrofman/196-GROFMAN-%20one%20dim%20pol-%20part%20I,theory-Ox%20Handbook%20PC-2018.pdfGoogle Scholar
Hall, Andrew, and Thompson, Daniel. 2018. “Who Punishes Extremist Nominees? Candidate Ideology and Turning out the Base in US Elections.” American Political Science Review 112 (3): 509–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hinich, Melvin, and Munger, Michael. 1996. Ideology and the Theory of Political Choice. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Hirano, Shigeo, Snyder, James, and Ting, Michael. 2009. “Distributive Politics with Primaries.” Journal of Politics 71 (4): 1467–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iyengar, Shanto, and Massey, Douglas. 2018. “Scientific Communication in a Post-Truth Society.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (November). DOI:10.1073/pnas.1805868115.Google Scholar
Kernell, Georgia. 2018. “Civic Duty, Networking, or Influence? Party-Level Explanations for Membership.” Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, August 30-September 1, San Francisco.Google Scholar
Kernell, Georgia. Forthcoming. Inside Parties: Organizations, Electoral Success, and Comparative Political Behavior. Book manuscript.Google Scholar
Lord, Charles, Ross, Lee, and Lepper, Mark. 1979. “Biased Assimilation and Attitude Polarization: The Effects of Prior Theories on Subsequently Considered Evidence.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 37 (11): 2098–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lupia, Arthur, and McCubbins, Mathew D.. 1998. The Democratic Dilemma: Can Citizens Learn What They Need to Know? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Morgan, Stephen. 2018. “Status Threat, Economic Hardship, and the 2016 Presidential Vote.” Socius 4: 1–17.Google Scholar
Mutz, Diana. 2018. “Status Threat, Not Economic Hardship, Explains the 2016 Presidential Vote.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Arts and Sciences 115 (19): 4330–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Persson, Torsten, Roland, Gerard, and Tabellini, Guido. 2007. “Electoral Rules and Government Spending in Parliamentary Democracies.” Quarterly Journal of Political Science 2 (2): 155–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riker, William H. 1986. The Art of Political Manipulation. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Rosenbluth, Frances, and Shapiro, Ian. 2018. Responsible Parties: Saving Democracy from Itself. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwartzberg, Melissa. 2015. “Epistemic Democracy and its Challenges.” American Review of Political Science 18: 187–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snyder, James, Hirano, Shigeo, and Ting, Michael. 2018. “Primary Elections and the Provision of Public Goods.” Journal of Politics 80 (2): 647–61.Google Scholar
Stein, Ernesto, and Tommasi, Mariano (eds.). 2008. Policymaking in Latin America: How Politics Shapes Policies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Sunstein, Cass. 2009. Going to Extremes: How Like Minds Unite and Divide. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Tversky, Amos, and Kahneman, Daniel. 1974. “Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases.” Science 185 (4157): 1124–31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Waddington, Kenneth. 2008. “The Madness of the Mob? Explaining the ‘Irrationality’ and Destructiveness of Crowd Violence.” Sociology Compass 2 (2): 675–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wallis, Kenneth. 2014. “Revisiting Francis Galton’s Forecasting Competition.” Statistical Science 29 (3): 420–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar