Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-30T20:54:21.727Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Democratic Dilemma: Taking the Dilemma out of Democracy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 July 2019

Frances McCall Rosenbluth Open the ORCID record for Frances McCall Rosenbluth [Opens in a new window]
Frances McCall Rosenbluth*
Affiliation:
Yale University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Symposium: Can Citizens Learn What They Need to Know? Reflections on The Democratic Dilemma
Information
PS: Political Science & Politics , Volume 52 , Issue 4 , October 2019 , pp. 646 - 649
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bawn, Kathleen, Cohen, Martin, Karol, David, Masket, Seth, Noel, Hans, and Zaller, John. 2012. “A Theory of Political Parties: Groups, Policy Demands and Nominations in American Politics.” Perspectives on Politics 10: 571–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bawn, Kathleen, and Rosenbluth, Frances. 2006. “Short Versus Long Coalitions: Electoral Accountability and the Size of the Public Sector.” American Journal of Political Science 50 (2): 251–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bullock, John G. 2011. “Elite Influence on Public Opinion in an Informed Electorate.” American Political Science Review 105: 496–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bullock, John G., Gerber, Alan, Hill, Seth, and Huber, Gregory. 2015. “Partisan Bias in Factual Beliefs about Politics.” Quarterly Journal of Political Science 10: 519–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carey, John, and Shugart, Matthew. 1995. “Incentives to Cultivate a Personal Vote: A Rank Ordering of Electoral Formulas.” Electoral Studies 14 (4): 417–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, Gary. 1986. The Efficient Secret. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Druckman, James. 2019. “The Democratic Dilemma Then and Now.” PS: Political Science & Politics 52 (4): this issue.Google Scholar
Druckman, James, Fein, Jordan, and Leeper, Thomas. 2012. “A Source of Bias in Public Opinion Stability.” American Political Science Review 106 (2): 430–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferejohn, John. 1993. “The Spatial Model and Elections.” In Information, Participation, and Choice, ed. Grofman, Bernard, 107–124. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Glaeser, Edward, and Sunstein, Cass. 2014. “Does More Speech Correct Falsehoods?” Journal of Legal Studies 43 (1): 65–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grofman, Bernard. 2017. “Political Choices in One Dimension.” In Oxford Handbook of Public Choice, ed. Winer, Stanley, Voigt, Stefan, and Grofman, Bernard, Chapter 8. Oxford: Oxford University Press. http://www.socsci.uci.edu/~bgrofman/196-GROFMAN-%20one%20dim%20pol-%20part%20I,theory-Ox%20Handbook%20PC-2018.pdfGoogle Scholar
Hall, Andrew, and Thompson, Daniel. 2018. “Who Punishes Extremist Nominees? Candidate Ideology and Turning out the Base in US Elections.” American Political Science Review 112 (3): 509–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hinich, Melvin, and Munger, Michael. 1996. Ideology and the Theory of Political Choice. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Hirano, Shigeo, Snyder, James, and Ting, Michael. 2009. “Distributive Politics with Primaries.” Journal of Politics 71 (4): 1467–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iyengar, Shanto, and Massey, Douglas. 2018. “Scientific Communication in a Post-Truth Society.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (November). DOI:10.1073/pnas.1805868115.Google Scholar
Kernell, Georgia. 2018. “Civic Duty, Networking, or Influence? Party-Level Explanations for Membership.” Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, August 30-September 1, San Francisco.Google Scholar
Kernell, Georgia. Forthcoming. Inside Parties: Organizations, Electoral Success, and Comparative Political Behavior. Book manuscript.Google Scholar
Lord, Charles, Ross, Lee, and Lepper, Mark. 1979. “Biased Assimilation and Attitude Polarization: The Effects of Prior Theories on Subsequently Considered Evidence.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 37 (11): 2098–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lupia, Arthur, and McCubbins, Mathew D.. 1998. The Democratic Dilemma: Can Citizens Learn What They Need to Know? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Morgan, Stephen. 2018. “Status Threat, Economic Hardship, and the 2016 Presidential Vote.” Socius 4: 1–17.Google Scholar
Mutz, Diana. 2018. “Status Threat, Not Economic Hardship, Explains the 2016 Presidential Vote.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Arts and Sciences 115 (19): 4330–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Persson, Torsten, Roland, Gerard, and Tabellini, Guido. 2007. “Electoral Rules and Government Spending in Parliamentary Democracies.” Quarterly Journal of Political Science 2 (2): 155–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riker, William H. 1986. The Art of Political Manipulation. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Rosenbluth, Frances, and Shapiro, Ian. 2018. Responsible Parties: Saving Democracy from Itself. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schattsneider, Elmer. 1942. Party Government. New York: Farrar and Rinehart.Google Scholar
Schwartzberg, Melissa. 2015. “Epistemic Democracy and its Challenges.” American Review of Political Science 18: 187–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snyder, James, Hirano, Shigeo, and Ting, Michael. 2018. “Primary Elections and the Provision of Public Goods.” Journal of Politics 80 (2): 647–61.Google Scholar
Stein, Ernesto, and Tommasi, Mariano (eds.). 2008. Policymaking in Latin America: How Politics Shapes Policies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Sunstein, Cass. 2009. Going to Extremes: How Like Minds Unite and Divide. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Tversky, Amos, and Kahneman, Daniel. 1974. “Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases.” Science 185 (4157): 1124–31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Waddington, Kenneth. 2008. “The Madness of the Mob? Explaining the ‘Irrationality’ and Destructiveness of Crowd Violence.” Sociology Compass 2 (2): 675–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wallis, Kenneth. 2014. “Revisiting Francis Galton’s Forecasting Competition.” Statistical Science 29 (3): 420–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar