Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T14:34:46.580Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Liberal Ideology: On Intellectual Pluralism and the Marginalization of Marxism in US Political Science

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 June 2021

Kevin Funk Open the ORCID record for Kevin Funk [Opens in a new window]  and
Sebastián Sclofsky
Kevin Funk
Affiliation:
Trinity College
Sebastián Sclofsky
Affiliation:
California State University, Stanislaus
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Ideology in the Classroom
Information
PS: Political Science & Politics , Volume 54 , Issue 3 , July 2021 , pp. 593 - 597
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the American Political Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

al-Gharbi, Musa. 2017. “A Lack of Ideological Diversity Is Killing Social Research.” Times Higher Education 2298:27–28.Google Scholar
Bell, Duncan. 2014. “What Is Liberalism?” Political Theory 42 (6): 682–715.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blyth, Mark. 2016. “Global Trumpism.” Foreign Affairs, November 15. www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/2016-11-15/global-trumpism.Google Scholar
Brown, Wendy. 2015. Undoing the Demos: Neoliberalism’s Stealth Revolution. New York: Zone Books.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Connolly, William E. 2018. “A Discussion of Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt’s How Democracies Die.” Perspectives on Politics 16 (4): 1095–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dewey, John. 2000 [1935]. Liberalism and Social Action. Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books.Google Scholar
Freeden, Michael. 1996. Ideologies and Political Theory: A Conceptual Approach. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Freeden, Michael. 2015. Liberalism: A Very Short Introduction. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fukuyama, Francis. 2018. Identity: The Demand for Dignity and the Politics of Resentment. New York: Farrar, Straus, and Giroux.Google Scholar
Funk, Kevin. 2019. “Making Interpretivism Visible: Reflections after a Decade of the Methods Café.” PS: Political Science & Politics 52 (3): 465–69.Google Scholar
Goldberg, Jonah. 2018. Suicide of the West: How the Rebirth of Tribalism, Populism, Nationalism, and Identity Politics Is Destroying American Democracy. New York: Crown Forum.Google Scholar
Harvey, David L. 1990. “Introduction.” Sociological Perspectives 33 (1): 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harvey, David L. 2007. A Brief History of Neoliberalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Heller, Henry. 2016. The Capitalist University: The Transformations of Higher Education in the United States, 1945–2016. London: Pluto Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kamola, Isaac A. 2019. Making the World Global: U.S. Universities and the Production of the Global Imaginary. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kellner, Douglas. 1995. “The Obsolescence of Marxism?” In Whither Marxism? Global Crisis in International Perspective, ed. Magnus, Bernd and Stephen, Cullenberg, 3–29. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
King, Gary, Keohane, Robert, and Verba, Sidney. 1994. Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koenig, Thomas, et al. 2018. “American Political Science Review Editors’ Report 2016–17.” PS: Political Science & Politics 51 (2): 478–84.Google Scholar
Leeds, Brett Ashley, Tickner, J. Ann, Wight, Colin, and Alba-Ulloa, Jessica De. 2019. “Forum: Power and Rules in the Profession of International Studies.” International Studies Review 21 (2): 188–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levitsky, Steven, and Ziblatt, Daniel. 2018. How Democracies Die. New York: Crown.Google Scholar
Locke, John. 1980 [1690]. Second Treatise of Government, edited by Macpherson, C. B.. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Lovell, David W. 1984. From Marx to Lenin: An Evaluation of Marx’s Responsibility for Soviet Authoritarianism. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacLean, Nancy. 2017. Democracy in Chains: The Deep History of the Radical Right’s Stealth Plan for America. New York: Viking Press.Google Scholar
Marx, Karl. 1888. “Theses on Feuerbach.” In The Marx-Engels Reader, second edition, ed. Tucker, Robert C., 143–45. New York: W. W. Norton & Co.Google Scholar
Marx, Karl. 1964. “The German Ideology: Part I.” The Marx-Engels Reader, second edition, ed. Tucker, Robert C., 146–200. New York: W. W. Norton & Co.Google Scholar
Meyerhoff, Eli. 2019. Beyond Education: Radical Studying for Another World. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mittelman, James H. 2017. Implausible Dream: The World-Class University and Repurposing Higher Education. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mounk, Yascha. 2018. The People vs. Democracy: Why Our Freedom Is in Danger and How to Save It. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ollman, Bertell. 1971. Alienation: Marx’s Conception of Man in Capitalist Society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Oren, Ido. 2013. Our Enemies and US: America’s Rivalries and the Making of Political Science. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Polanyi, Karl. 2001. The Great Transformation: The Political and Economic Origins of Our Time, second edition. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Saideman, Stephen M. 2018. “The Apparent Decline of the IR Paradigms: Examining Patterns of Publications, Perceptions, and Citations.” International Studies Review 20 (4): 685–703.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sandel, Michael. 1984. Liberalism and Its Critics. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Sandel, Michael. 2010. Justice: What’s the Right Thing to Do? New York: Farrar, Strauss, & Giroux.Google Scholar
Schmidt, Jeff. 2001. Disciplined Minds: A Critical Look at Salaried Professionals and the Soul-Battering System That Shapes Their Lives. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Schram, Sanford F. 2013. Becoming a Footnote: An Activist–Scholar Finds His Voice, Learns to Write, and Survives Academia. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Schram, Sanford F., and Brian, Caterino (eds.). 2006. Making Political Science Matter: Debating Knowledge, Research, and Method. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Schwartz-Shea, Peregrine. 2003. “Is This the Curriculum We Want? Doctoral Requirements and Offerings in Methods and Methodology.” PS: Political Science & Politics 36 (3): 379–86.Google Scholar
Sclofsky, Sebastián, and Funk, Kevin. 2018. “The Specter That Haunts Political Science: The Neglect and Misreading of Marx in International Relations and Comparative Politics.” International Studies Perspectives 19 (1): 83–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skinner, Quentin. 1998. Liberty before Liberalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sunstein, Cass R. 2018. “The Problem with All Those Liberal Professors: The Paucity of Republicans at Many Top Schools Hurts Everyone.” Bloomberg Opinion, September 17. www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2018-09-17/colleges-have-way-too-many-liberal-professors.Google Scholar
Tickner, J. Ann. 2005. “What Is Your Research Program? Some Feminist Answers to International Relations Methodological Questions.” International Studies Quarterly 49 (1): 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tocqueville, Alexis de. 2003 [1835]. Democracy in America. New York: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Tucker, Robert C. (ed.). 1978. The Marx-Engels Reader, second edition. New York: W. W. Norton & Co.Google Scholar
Evera, Van, Stephen, . 1997. Guide to Methods for Students of Political Science. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Wright, Erik Olin. 2015. “Why Class Matters.” Jacobin. http://jacobinmag.com/2015/12/socialism-marxism-democracy-inequality-erik-olin-wright.Google Scholar
Yanow, Dvora, and Schwartz-Shea, Peregrine. 2013. Interpretation and Method: Empirical Research Methods and the Interpretive Turn, second edition. Armonk, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Zinn, Howard. 2018. You Can’t Be Neutral on a Moving Train: A Personal History. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar