We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Type
Profession Symposium: Reinventing the Scholarly Conference: Reflections from the Field
Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)
References
REFERENCES
Akerlof, George A. 1970. “The Market for ‘Lemons’: Quality Uncertainty and the Market Mechanism.” Quarterly Journal of Economics84 (3): 488–500.Google Scholar
Deardorff, Michelle D. 2015. “Reconsidering the Scholarly Conference for the Contemporary Academic.” PS: Political Science and Politics (48) 2: this issue.Google Scholar
Derthick, Martha, and Quirk, Paul J.. 1985. The Politics of Deregulation. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
Pierson, Paul. 2000. “Increasing Returns, Path Dependence and the Study of Politics.” American Political Science Review94 (2): 251–67.Google Scholar
Rom, Mark. 2012. “The Scholarly Conference: Do We Want Democracy and Markets or Authority and Tradition?” Journal of Political Science Education8: 333–51.Google Scholar
Rom, Mark. 2015. “Reinventing the Scholarly Conference: Videotape the Presentations, Flip the Panels.” PS: Political Science and Politics48 (2): this issue.Google Scholar
Rutherford, Amanda. 2015. “Conquering the ‘Lumbering Dinosaur’: Graduate Student Experiences at Political Science Conferences.” PS: Political Science and Politics48 (2): this issue.Google Scholar
Vonnegut, Kurt. 1963. Cat’s Cradle. New York: Random House.Google Scholar