Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T18:33:53.274Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Capital punishment for children's services: a new legal policy?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

Barry Jones
Barry Jones*
Affiliation:
Michael Rutter Centre, Maudsley Hospital, De Crespigny Park, London, SE5 8AF, email: doc_beej@hotmail.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Recent adverse changes to the interpretation of aspects of the Children Act 1989 have deleteriously combined with amendments to limit accessibility to the legal aid budget. A closer enquiry highlights that contradictions within government policy and the law have significant implications for struggling families, with adequate assessment and treatment being consistently withdrawn. As children's needs are left increasingly unanswered, the evident cycle of neglect and deprivation of children is obviated by the clinical situation within the Cassel hospital, the only remaining National Health Service (NHS) in-patient resource for whole families.

Type
Editorial
Information
Psychiatric Bulletin , Volume 32 , Issue 7 , July 2008 , pp. 241 - 244
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 2008

References

Association of Lawyers for Children (2007) Response of the Association of Lawyers for Children to the Family and Family Mediation Scheme. Association of Lawyers for Children (http://www.alc.org.uk/docs/ALC_Family_Law_and_Family_Mediation_Scheme_Apr07.pdf).Google Scholar
Department of Health, Department for Education and Employment & Home Office (2000) Framework for the Assessment of Children in Need and Their Families. TSO (The Stationery Office).Google Scholar
Department for Education and Skills (2006): Care Matters: Transforming the Lives of Children and Young People in Care. HMSO.Google Scholar
Jones, B. (2006) Child psychiatry and the law: when assessment threatens treatment. Psychiatric Bulletin, 30, 441–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, B. (2008) The price of permanency: cost–benefit analysis of a psychosocial intervention for children and families. International Journal of Therapeutic Communities, in press.Google Scholar
Kennedy, R. (2001) Assessment and treatment in family law – a valid distinction? Family Law, 31, 676–681.Google Scholar
Legal Services Commission (2007) Legal Aid Reform: Family and Family Mediation Fee Schemes for October 2007. Legal Services Commission.Google Scholar
Lords Hansard (2007) House of Lords Debates (Wednesday 25th July 2007): (http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld200607/ldhansard/text/70725-0017.htm).Google Scholar
White, R., Carr, P. & Lowe, N. (1990) A Guide to the Children Act 1989. Butterworths.Google Scholar
Kent County Council v. G & Others [2005] UKHL 68.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.