Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T17:18:42.151Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

User involvement in care planning

The Care Programme Approach (CPA) from the users' perspective

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

Mike Lawson ,
Chrissie Strickland  and
Paul Wolfson
Mike Lawson
Affiliation:
Oxleas NHS Trust Bexley Hospital, Kent DA5 2BW
Chrissie Strickland
Affiliation:
Bexley, Kent
Paul Wolfson*
Affiliation:
Oxleas NHS Trust Bexley Hospital, Kent DA5 2BW
*
∗Correspondence
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Aims and method

To assess the extent of user involvement in care planning, from the users' perspective. Fifty Care Programme Approach (CPA) meetings across five consultant teams were included using quota sampling. Data concerning user involvement was collected by direct observation, semi-structured interviews with users and keyworkers and a review of CPA documentation.

Results

User involvement in needs assessment and decision-making was poor, as was knowledge of care planning and information provision to users.

Clinical implications

Limited resources and conflict resulting from the more containing aspects of the CPA remain obstacles for user involvement. Possible improvements include user led needs assessment, information pack provision and limiting attendance at CPA meetings.

Type
Original Papers
Information
Psychiatric Bulletin , Volume 23 , Issue 9: The Journal of Trends in Psychiatric Practice , September 1999 , pp. 539 - 541
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © 1999 The Royal College of Psychiatrists

References

Avon Mental Health Measure Working Group (1996) The Avon Mental Health Measure: A User-Centred Approach of Assessing Need. Bristol: Bristol Social Services.Google Scholar
Carson, J. & Sharma, T. (1994) In-patient psychiatric care: What helps? Staff and patient perspectives. Journal of Mental Health (UK), 3, 99 104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Department of Health (1990) The Care Programme Approach for People with a Mental Illness Referred to Specialist Psychiatric Services. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
Guy, W. (1976) ECDEU Assessment Manual for Psychopharmacology. Revised DHEW pub. no. (ADM) 78–388. Rockville, MD: National Institute of Mental Health.Google Scholar
Sparr, L. F., Moffitt, M. C. & Ward, M. F. (1993) Missed psychiatric appointments: who returns and who stays away. American Journal of Psychiatry, 150, 801 805.Google Scholar
World Health Organization (1992) The Tenth Revision of the International Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems. Geneva: WHO.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.