Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T05:51:32.239Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Psychosocial sequelae of the 1989 Newcastle earthquake: II. Exposure and morbidity profiles during the first 2 years post-disaster

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 1997

V. J. CARR
Affiliation:
Discipline of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Newcastle, NSW, Australia
T. J. LEWIN
Affiliation:
Discipline of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Newcastle, NSW, Australia
R. A. WEBSTER
Affiliation:
Discipline of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Newcastle, NSW, Australia
J. A. KENARDY
Affiliation:
Discipline of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Newcastle, NSW, Australia
P. L. HAZELL
Affiliation:
Discipline of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Newcastle, NSW, Australia
G. L. CARTER
Affiliation:
Discipline of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Newcastle, NSW, Australia

Abstract

Background. A sample of 1089 Australian adults was selected for the longitudinal component of the Quake Impact Study, a 2-year, four-phase investigation of the psychosocial effects of the 1989 Newcastle earthquake. Of these, 845 (78%) completed a survey 6 months post-disaster as well as one or more of the three follow-up surveys.

Methods. The phase 1 survey was used to construct dimensional indices of self-reported exposure to threat the disruption and also to classify subjects by their membership of five ‘at risk’ groups (the injured; the displaced; owners of damaged small businesses; helpers in threat and non-threat situations). Psychological morbidity was assessed at each phase using the 12-item General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12) and the Impact of Event Scale (IES).

Results. Psychological morbidity declined over time but tended to stabilize at about 12 months post-disaster for general morbidity (GHQ-12) and at about 18 months for trauma-related (IES) morbidity. Initial exposure to threat and/or disruption were significant predictors of psychological morbidity throughout the study and had superior predictive power to membership of the targeted ‘at risk’ groups. The degree of ongoing disruption and other life events since the earthquake were also significant predictors of morbidity. The injured reported the highest levels of distress, but there was a relative absence of morbidity among the helpers.

Conclusions. Future disaster research should carefully assess the threat and disruption experiences of the survivors at the time of the event and monitor ongoing disruptions in the aftermath in order to target interventions more effectively.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 1997 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)