Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-lrblm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-07T18:14:57.016Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Generalized Solution of the Orthogonal Procrustes Problem

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2025

Peter H. Schönemann
Peter H. Schönemann*
Affiliation:
Psychometric Laboratory, University of North Carolina†
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A solutionT of the least-squares problem AT=B + E, given A and B so that trace (E′E)= minimum and T′T= I is presented. It is compared with a less general solution of the same problem which was given by Green [5]. The present solution, in contrast to Green's, is applicable to matrices A and B which are of less than full column rank. Some technical suggestions for the numerical computation of T and an illustrative example are given.

Type
Original Paper
Information
Psychometrika , Volume 31 , Issue 1 , March 1966 , pp. 1 - 10
Copyright
Copyright © 1966 Psychometric Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

This paper is based on parts of a thesis submitted to the Graduate College of the University of Illinois in partial fulfillment of the requirements for a Ph.D. degree in Psychology.

†

The work reported here was carried out while the author was employed by the Statistical Service Unit Research, U. of Illinois. It is a pleasure to express my appreciation to Prof. K. W. Dickman, director of this unit, for his continuous support and encouragement in this and other work. I also gratefully acknowledge my debt to Prof. L. Humphreys for suggesting the problem and to Prof. L. R. Tucker, who derived (1.7) and (1.8) in summation notation, suggested an iterative solution (not reported here) and who provided generous help and direction at all stages of the project.

References

Bellman, R. Introduction to matrix analysis, New York: McGraw-Hill, 1960.Google Scholar
Dwyer, P. S. and McPhail, M. S. Symbolic matrix derivatives. Ann. math. Statist., 1948, 19, 517–534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eckart, C. and Young, G. The approximation of one matrix by another of lower rank. Psychometrika, 1936, 1, 211–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, W. A. On the least-squares orthogonalization of an oblique transformation. Psychometrika, 1962, 27, 193–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, B. F. The orthogonal approximation of an oblique structure in factor analysis. Psychometrika, 1952, 17, 429–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
HOW. FORTRAN Subroutine, using non-iterative methods of Householder, Ortega, and Wilkinson, solves for eigenvalues and corresponding eigenvectors of a real symmetric matrix. Program writeup F2 BC HOW. Berkeley Division, Univ. Calif., 1962.Google Scholar
Hunter, J. Personal communication, 1964.Google Scholar
Hurley, J. R. and Cattell, R. B. Producing direct rotation to test a hypothesized factor structure. Behav. Sci., 1962, 7, 258–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, R. M. On a theorem by Eckart and Young. Psychometrika, 1963, 28, 259–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, R. M. The minimal transformation to orthonormality. Paper read at the joint meeting of the Psychonomic Society and the Psychometric Society, Niagara Falls, Ontario, Canada, 1964.Google Scholar
Mosier, C. I. Determining a simple structure when loadings for certain tests are known. Psychometrika, 1939, 4, 149–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmid, J. and Leiman, J. M. The development of hierarchical factor solutions. Psychometrika, 1957, 22, 53–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schönemann, P. H., Bock, R. D., and Tucker, L. R. Some notes on a theorem by Eckart and Young. Univ. of North Carolina Psychometric Laboratory Research Memorandum No. 25, 1965.Google Scholar
Thurstone, L. L. Multiple-factor analysis, Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press, 1947.Google Scholar
Tucker, L. R. Personal communication, 1964.Google Scholar