Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-mzp66 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-07T18:23:07.404Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Rotation to Simple Loadings Using Component Loss Functions: The Orthogonal Case

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2025

Robert I. Jennrich
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Component loss functions (CLFs) are used to generalize the quartimax criterion for orthogonal rotation in factor analysis. These replace the fourth powers of the factor loadings by an arbitrary function of the second powers. Criteria of this form were introduced by a number of authors, primarily Katz and Rohlf (1974) and Rozeboom (1991), but there has been essentially no follow-up to this work. A method so simple, natural, and general deserves to be investigated more completely. A number of theoretical results are derived including the fact that any method using a concave CLF will recover perfect simple structure whenever it exists, and there are methods that will recover Thurstone simple structure whenever it exists. Specific CLFs are identified and it is shown how to compare these using standardized plots. Numerical examples are used to illustrate and compare CLF and other methods. Sorted absolute loading plots are introduced to aid in comparing results and setting parameters for methods that require them.

Keywords

Factor analysiscomponent loss criteriagradient projectionhyperplane count methodsquartimaxminimum entropysimplimaxsorted absolute loading plotsvarimax
Type
Theory And Methods
Information
Psychometrika , Volume 69 , Issue 2 , June 2004 , pp. 257 - 273
Copyright
Copyright © 2004 The Psychometric Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

The author is very indebted to a reviewer for pointing him to the generalized hyperplane count literature and to all the reviewers for valuable comments and suggestions.

References

Browne, M.W. (1972). Orthogonal rotation to a partially specified target. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 25, 115–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Browne, M.W. (2001). An overview of analytic rotation in exploratory factor analysis. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 36, 111–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eber, H.W. (1966). Toward oblique simple structure: Maxplane. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 1, 112–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferguson, T.S. (1967). Mathematical Statistics. New York: Academic PressGoogle Scholar
Jennrich, R.I. (2001). A simple general procedure for orthogonal rotation. Psychometrika, 66, 289–306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jennrich, R.I. (2002). A simple general method for oblique rotation. Psychometrika, 67, 7–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaiser, H.F. (1958). The varimax criterion for analytic rotation in factor analysis. Psychometrika, 23, 187–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katz, J.O. & Rohlf, F.J. (1974). FUNCTIONPLANE—A new approach to simple structure rotation. Psychometrika, 39, 37–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kiers, H.A.L. (1994). SIMPLIMAX: Oblique rotation to an optimal target with simple structure. Psychometrika, 59, 567–579CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCammon, R.B. (1966). Principal components analysis and its application in large scale correlation studies. Journal of Geology, 74, 721–733CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neuhaus, J.O. & Wrigley, C. (1954). The quartimax method: An analytical approach to orthogonal simple structure. British Journal of Statistical Psychology, 7, 81–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rozeboom, W.W. (1991). Theory and practice of analytic hyperplane optimization. Psychometrika, 26, 179–197Google ScholarPubMed
Thurstone, L.L. (1935). Vectors of the Mind. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago PressGoogle Scholar
Thurstone, L.L. (1947). Multiple Factor Analysis. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago PressGoogle Scholar