Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-v2bm5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-07T18:48:44.981Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Alternative Views on Correlations between Persons

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2025

Cyril Burt  and
William Stephenson
Cyril Burt
Affiliation:
University of London
William Stephenson
Affiliation:
University of Oxford
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The article discusses the general principles involved in factorizing correlations between persons, and compares the special techniques put forward by Burt and Stephenson respectively. The chief points of agreement and disagreement are summarized. In statistical procedure the two writers prove to be largely in accord; but they differ over the psychological and the methodological implications, the chief source of divergence being the so-called “reciprocity principle.”

Type
Original Paper
Information
Psychometrika , Volume 4 , Issue 4 , December 1939 , pp. 269 - 281
Copyright
Copyright © 1939 The Psychometric Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Cattell, J. Mc. The American Society of Naturalists: Homo Scientificus Americanus. Science, N. S., 1903, 17, 561–570.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Burt, C. Mental and scholastic tests, London: P. S. King, 1921.Google Scholar
Binns, H., & Burt, C. A comparison of judgments in the evaluation of cloths. J. Nat. Inst. industr. Psychol., 1922, 1, 93–98.Google Scholar
Burt, C., Gaw, F., & Spielman, W. A study in vocational guidance, London: H. M. Stationery Office, 1926.Google Scholar
Hartog, P., Rhodes, E. C., & Burt, C. Marks of examiners, London: Macmillan, 1936.Google Scholar
Stephenson, W. The inverted factor technique. Brit. J. Psychol., 1936, 26, 344–361.Google Scholar
Stephenson, W. The foundations of psychometry: four factor systems. Psychometrika, 1936, 1, 195–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burt, C. Correlations between persons. Brit. J. Psychol., 1937, 28, 59–96.Google Scholar
Burt, C. The analysis of temperament. Brit. J. med. Psychol., 1938, 17, 158–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burt, C. Factor analysis by submatrices. J. Psychol., 1938, 6, 339–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dewar, H. A comparison of tests of artistic appreciation. Brit. J. educ. Psychol., 1938, 8, 29–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, M. The general factor in correlations between persons. Brit. J. Psychol., 1939, 19, 1–19.Google Scholar
Stephenson, W. A methodological consideration of Jung's typology. J. ment. Sci., 1939, 85, 185–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stephenson, W.Two contributions to the theory of mental testing: I. A new performance test for measuring abilities as correlation coefficients. (Submitted toBrit. J. Psychol.)Google Scholar
Thomson, G. Factorial analysis of human ability, London: Univ. London Press, 1939.CrossRefGoogle Scholar