Hostname: page-component-5f745c7db-nzk4m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-06T07:43:06.389Z Has data issue: true hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Confirmation and Clarification of Primary Personality Factors

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2025

Raymond B. Cattell
Raymond B. Cattell*
Affiliation:
University of Illinois
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In connection with a study bridging rating, questionnaire, and objective test factors, confirmation was sought with respect to the twelve personality factors previously found for young adult men. Variables were chosen to clarify and discriminate the nature of related factors. Ratings of and by 373 students were obtained, and the present study describes the separate factorization for the 133 men among them. Factorization yielded eleven factors, of which, on “blind” rotation for simple structure, 9 or 10 proved to be identical with those of the previous study. A new factor M is described.

Type
Original Paper
Information
Psychometrika , Volume 12 , Issue 3 , September 1947 , pp. 197 - 220
Copyright
Copyright © 1947 The Psychometric Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

There have, of course, been numerous studies bridging in terms of simple BR, Q, and T variables, but not in terms of matching definite unitary traits.

†

These were students in a state university, taking a rather large section of the population, swollen still further by the first returning veterans; so that the study is, fortunately, not open to the usual criticism of the use of student subjects, namely that they represent an extremely small and biased sample of the general population. Certainly. in spite of the comments of teachers, these subjects are somewhat selected in intelligence and probably to a lesser extent in character; but not enough to do more than alter the relative variance due to different factors.

References

Cattell, R. B. The description of personality: principles and findings in a factor analysis. Amer. J. Psychol., 1945, 58, 69–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cattell, R. B. Simple structure in relation to some alternative factorizations of the personality sphere. J. gen. Psychol., 1946, 35, 225–238.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cattell, R. B. The description and measurement of personality, New York: World Book Co., 1946.Google Scholar
Cattell, R. B. A guide to mental testing, London: Univ. of London Press, 1947.Google Scholar
Cattell, R. B. Comparison of the primary personality factors in men and women. (In press).Google Scholar
Cattell, R. B.; Cattell, Karen A. S.; & Rhymer, Rue M.P-technique demonstrated in determining psycho-physiological source traits in a normal individual. To be published in Psychometrika.Google Scholar
Guilford, J. P. & Guilford, R. B. Personality factors. D, R, T and A. J. abnorm. soc. Psychol., 1939, 34, 1–1.Google Scholar
Symonds, P. M. Diagnosing personality and conduct, New York: Appleton Century, 1931.Google Scholar
Thurstone, L. L. Primary mental abilities, Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press, 1938.Google Scholar
Thurstone, L. L. The effects of selection in factor analysis. Psychometrika, 1945, 10, 165–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar