Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-hvd4g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-07T17:54:27.716Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Equivalent LLTMS: A Rejoinder

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2025

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Notes And Comments
Copyright
Copyright © 2004 The Psychometric Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bechger, T.M., Verhelst, N.D., & Verstralen, H.H.F.M. (2001). Identifiability of nonlinear logistic test models. Psychometrika, 66, 357372CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bechger, T.M., Verstralen, H.H.F.M., & Verhelst, N.D. (2002). Equivalent linear logistic test models. Psychometrika, 67, 123136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butter, R., De Boeck, P., & Verhelst, N. (1998). An item response model with internal restrictions on item difficulty. Psychometrika, 63, 4763CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fischer, G.H. (2004). Remarks on “Equivalent Linear Logistic Test Models” by Bechger, Verstralen, & Verhelst (2002). Psychometrika, 69, 305315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maris, G., & Bechger, T.M. (2004). Equivalent MIRID models. Psychometrika, to appear.CrossRefGoogle Scholar