Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-g4j75 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-08T15:52:55.018Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Exploratory Longitudinal Factor Analysis in Multiple Populations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2025

John Tisak  and
William Meredith
John Tisak*
Affiliation:
Bowling Green State University
William Meredith
Affiliation:
University of California, Berkeley
*
Requests for reprints should be sent to John Tisak, Department of Psychology, Bowling Green State University, Bowling Green, Ohio 43403-0228.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

For multiple populatios, a longtidinal factor analytic model which is entirely exploratory, that is, no explicit identification constraints, is proposed. Factorial collapse and period/practice effects are allowed. An invariant and/or stationary factor pattern is permitted. This model is formulated stochastically. To implement this model a stagewise EM algorithm is developed. Finally a numerical illustration utilizing Nesselroade and Baltes' data is presented.

Keywords

longitudinal factor analysisEM algorithmmaximum likelihood extimation
Type
Original Paper
Information
Psychometrika , Volume 54 , Issue 2 , June 1989 , pp. 261 - 281
Copyright
Copyright © 1989 The Psychometric Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

The authors wish to thank Barbara Mellers and Henry Kaiser for their helpful comments and John Nesselroade for providing us the data for our illustration. This research was supported in part by a grant (No. AG03164) from the National Institute on Aging to William Meredith. Details of the derivations and a copy of the PROC MATRIX program are available upon request from the first author.

References

Bayley, N. (1955). On the growth of intelligence. American Psychologist, 10, 805–818.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bellman, R. (1960). Introduction to matrix analysis, New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Bentler, P. M. (1973). Assessment of developmental factor change at the individual and group level. In Nesselroade, J. R., Baltes, P. B. (Eds.), Life-span developmental psychology (pp. 145–174). New York: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bieber, S. L., Meredith, W. (1986). Transformation to achieve a longitudinally statioonary factor pattern matrix. Psychometrika, 51, 535–547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Browne, M. W. (1984). Asymptotically distribution-free methods for the analysis of covariance structures. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical psychology, 37, 62–83.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cattell, R. B. (1963). Theory of fluid and crystallized intelligence: A critical experiment. Journal of Educatioonal Psychology, 54, 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, M. P. (1944). Changes in primary mental abilities with age. Archives of Psychology, 291, 30–30.Google Scholar
Cudeck, R., Browne, M. W. (1983). Cross-validation of covariance structures. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 18, 147–167.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dempster, A. P., Laird, N. M., Rubin, D. B. (1977). Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM algorithm. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 39, 1–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guttman, L. (1956). “Best possible” systematic estimates of communalities. Psychometrika, 21, 273–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jöreskog, K. G. (1971). Simultaneous factor analysis in several populations. Psychometrika, 36, 409–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jöreskog, K. G. (1979). Statistical estimation of structural models in longitudinal-developmental investigations. In Nesselroade, J. R., Baltes, P. B. (Eds.), Longitudinal research in the study of behavior and development (pp. 303–351). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Jöreskog, K. G., Sörbom, D. (1984). LISREL VI: Analysis of linear structural relationships by the method of maximum likelihood, Chicago: Scientific Software.Google Scholar
Jöreskog, K. G., Sörbom, D. (1985). Simultaneous analysis of longitudinal data from several cohorts. In Mason, W. M., Fienberg, S. E. (Eds.), Cohort analysis in social research (pp. 323–341). New York: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kroonenberg, P. M., Lammers, C. J., Stoop, I. (1985). Three-mode principal component analysis of multivariate longitudinal organizational data. Sociological methods & review, 14, 99–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kroonenberg, P. M., Lewis, C. (1982). Methodological issues in the search for a factor model: Exploration through confirmation. Journal of Educational Statistics, 7, 69–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lohmöller, J. B. (1978). How longitudinal factor stability, continuity, differentiation, and integration are portrayed into the core matrix of three-mode factor analysis. Paper presented at the European Meeting on Psychometrics and Mathematical Psychology, Uppsala, Sweden.Google Scholar
Lord, F. M. (1980). Applications or item response theory to practical testing problems, Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google ScholarPubMed
Lord, F. M., Novick, M. R. (1968). Statistical theories of mental test scores, Menlo Park, CA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Mardia, K. V. (1970). Measures of multivariate skewness and kurtosis with applications. Biometrika, 57, 519–530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDonald, R. P. (1978). A simple comprehensive model for the analysis of covariance structures. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 31, 59–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meredith, W. (1964). Notes on factorial invariance. Psychometrika, 21, 177–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meredith, W. (1964). Rotation to achieve factorial invariance. Psychometrika, 20, 187–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meredith, W., Tisak, J. (1982). Canonical analysis of longitudinal and repeated measures data with stationary weights. Psychometrika, 47, 47–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meredith, W., & Tisak, J. (in press). Latent curve analysis. Psychometrika.Google Scholar
Millsap, R. E., Meredith, W. (1988). Component analysis in cross-sectional and longitudinal data. Psychometrika, 53, 123–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nesselroade, J. R., & Baltes, P. B. (1974). Adolescent personality development and historical change: 1970–1972. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 39, (1, Serial No. 154).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Olsson, U., Bergman, L. R. (1977). A longitudinal factor model for studying change in ability structure. Journal of Multivariate Behavioral Research, 12, 221–241.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rubin, D. B., Thayer, D. T. (1982). EM algorithms for ML factor analysis. Psychometrika, 47, 69–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SAS Institute (1985). The MATRIX Procedure, Cary, NC: Author.Google Scholar
Schaie, K. W. (1965). A general model for the study of developmental problems. Psychological Bulletin, 64, 92–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schönemann, P. H. (1985). On the formal differentiation of traces and determinants. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 20, 113–139.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Spearman, C. (1904). “General intelligence,” objectively determined and measured. American Journal of Psychology, 15, 201–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swaminathan, H. (1984). Factor analysis of longitudinal data. In Law, H. G., Snyder, C. W. Jr., Hattie, J. A., McDonald, R. P. (Eds.), Research methods for multimode data analysis (pp. 308–332). New York: Prageger.Google Scholar
Thomson, G. H. (1951). The factorial analysis of human ability, Loondon: University of Londoon Press.Google Scholar
Thursstone, L. L., Thurstone, T. G. (1982). SRA Primary Mental Abilities, Chicago: Science Research Associates.Google Scholar
Tisak, J. (1984). Exploratory Longitudinal factor analysis in multiple populations with application to growth in intelligence, Berkeley: University of California.Google Scholar
Tisak, J., & Meredith, W. (1986), June). “Tuckerizing” curves for latent variables. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Psychometric Society, Toronto, Canada.Google Scholar
Tucker, L. R. (1963). Implications of factor analysis of three-way matrices for measurement of change. In Harris, C. W. (Eds.), Problems in measuring change (pp. 122–137). Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Verdonik, F., Sherrod, L. R. (1984). An inventory of longitudinal research on childhood and adolescence, New York: Social Science Research Council.Google Scholar
Vinsonhaler, J. F., Meredith, W. (1966). A stochastic model for repeated testing. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 1, 461–477.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed