Hostname: page-component-5f745c7db-2kk5n Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-06T07:17:24.347Z Has data issue: true hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A General Approach to Nonlinear Factor Analysis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2025

Roderick P. McDonald
Roderick P. McDonald*
Affiliation:
University of New England, N.S.W., Australia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The method presented attempts to allow for nonlinear, possibly nonmonotonic relations between manifest and latent variates. An attempt is made to provide a workable criterion for choosing between alternative models on the basis of observable data as well as for constructing the appropriate function. An idealized numerical example is given.

Type
Original Paper
Information
Psychometrika , Volume 27 , Issue 4 , December 1962 , pp. 397 - 415
Copyright
Copyright © 1962 The Psychometric Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

The author is indebted to Mr. E. J. Burr of the Department of Mathematics, University of New England, and to Dr. J. A. Keats of the University of Queensland, for their advice and criticism.

References

Eysenck, H. J. The nature of anxiety and the factorial method. Psychol. Rep., 1958, 4, 453–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, W. A. Three multivariate models: factor analysis, latent structure analysis, and latent profile analysis. Psychometrika, 1959, 24, 229–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, W. A. Nonlinear factors in two dimensions. Psychometrika, 1960, 25, 381–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guttman, L. The principal components of scale analysis. In Stouffer, S. A. et al (Eds.), Measurement and prediction. Princeton: Princeton Univ. Press, 1950, 312–361.Google Scholar
Holzinger, K. J. and Harman, H. H. Factor analysis, Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press, 1941.Google Scholar
Kendall, M. G. The advanced theory of statistics. Vol. 2, London: Griffin, 1946.Google Scholar
Kendall, M. G. and Stuart, A. The advanced theory of statistics. Vol. 1, London: Griffin, 1958.Google Scholar
Lazarsfeld, P. F. The logical and mathematical foundation of latent structure analysis. In Stouffer, S. A. et al (Eds.), Measurement and prediction. Princeton: Princeton Univ. Press, 1950, 362–412.Google Scholar
Lazarsfeld, P. F. A conceptual introduction to latent structure analysis. In Lazarsfeld, P. F. (Eds.), Mathematical thinking in the social sciences. Glencoe, Ill.: Free Press, 1954, 349–387.Google Scholar
Lazarsfeld, P. F. Latent structure analysis and test theory. In Gulliksen, H. and Messick, S. (Eds.), Psychological scaling: theory and applications. New York: Wiley, 1960, 83–96.Google Scholar
Suchman, E. A. The intensity component in attitude and opinion research. In Stouffer, S. A. et al (Eds.), Measurement and prediction. Princeton: Princeton Univ. Press, 1950, 213–276.Google Scholar
Szegö, G. Orthogonal polynomials. Amer. Math. Soc. Colloquium Publications, Vol. 23, 1959.Google Scholar
Thomson, G. H. The factorial analysis of human ability (4th ed.), New York: Houghton Mifflin, 1950.Google Scholar
Thurstone, L. L. Multiple-factor analysis, Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press, 1947.Google Scholar
Torgerson, W. S. Theory and methods of scaling, New York: Wiley, 1959.Google Scholar