Crossref Citations
This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by
Crossref.
YEN, WENDY M.
1986.
THE CHOICE OF SCALE FOR EDUCATIONAL MEASUREMENT: AN IRT PERSPECTIVE.
Journal of Educational Measurement,
Vol. 23,
Issue. 4,
p.
299.
Yen, Wendy M.
1987.
A comparison of the efficiency and accuracy of BILOG and LOGIST.
Psychometrika,
Vol. 52,
Issue. 2,
p.
275.
Yen, Wendy M.
Green, Donald Ross
and
Burket, George R.
1987.
Valid Normative Information From Customized Achievement Tests.
Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice,
Vol. 6,
Issue. 1,
p.
7.
Way, Walter D.
Ansley, Timothy N.
and
Forsyth, Robert A.
1988.
The Comparative Effects of Compensatory and Noncompensatory Two-Dimensional Data on Unidimensional IRT Estimates.
Applied Psychological Measurement,
Vol. 12,
Issue. 3,
p.
239.
Camilli, Gregory
1988.
Scale Shrinkage and the Estimation of Latent Distribution Parameters.
Journal of Educational Statistics,
Vol. 13,
Issue. 3,
p.
227.
Linn, Robert L.
1990.
Has Item Response Theory Increased the Validity of Achievement Test Scores?.
Applied Measurement in Education,
Vol. 3,
Issue. 2,
p.
115.
Nandakumar, Ratna
1991.
Traditional Dimensionality Versus Essential Dimensionality.
Journal of Educational Measurement,
Vol. 28,
Issue. 2,
p.
99.
De Ayala, R. J.
1992.
The Influence of Dimensionality on Cat Ability Estimation.
Educational and Psychological Measurement,
Vol. 52,
Issue. 3,
p.
513.
Oshima, T.C.
and
Miller, M. David
1992.
Multidimensionality and Item Bias in Item Response Theory.
Applied Psychological Measurement,
Vol. 16,
Issue. 3,
p.
237.
Camilli, Gregory
Yamamoto, Kentaro
and
Wang, Ming-mei
1993.
Scale Shrinkage in Vertical Equating.
Applied Psychological Measurement,
Vol. 17,
Issue. 4,
p.
379.
Nandakumar, Ratna
and
Stout, William
1993.
Refinements of Stout’s Procedure for Assessing Latent Trait Unidimensionality.
Journal of Educational Statistics,
Vol. 18,
Issue. 1,
p.
41.
Nandakumar, Ratna
1994.
Assessing Dimensionality of a Set of Item Responses‐Comparison of Different Approaches.
Journal of Educational Measurement,
Vol. 31,
Issue. 1,
p.
17.
North, Brian
1995.
The development of a common framework scale of descriptors of language proficiency based on a theory of measurement.
System,
Vol. 23,
Issue. 4,
p.
445.
Fitzpatrick, Anne R.
Link, Valerie B.
Yen, Wendy M.
Burket, George R.
Ito, Kyoko
and
Sykes, Robert C.
1996.
Scaling Performance Assessments: A Comparison of One‐Parameter and Two‐Parameter Partial Credit Models.
Journal of Educational Measurement,
Vol. 33,
Issue. 3,
p.
291.
Budescu, David V.
Cohen, Yoav
and
Ben-Simon, Anat
1997.
A Revised Modified Parallel Analysis for the Construction of Unidimensional Item Pools.
Applied Psychological Measurement,
Vol. 21,
Issue. 3,
p.
233.
Yen, Wendy M.
and
Burket, George R.
1997.
Comparison of Item Response Theory and Thurstone Methods of Vertical Scaling.
Journal of Educational Measurement,
Vol. 34,
Issue. 4,
p.
293.
Ercikan, Kadriye
Sehwarz, Richard D.
Julian, Marc W.
Burket, George R.
Weber, Melba M.
and
Link, Valerie
1998.
Calibration and Scoring of Tests With Multiple‐Choice and Constructed‐Response Item Types.
Journal of Educational Measurement,
Vol. 35,
Issue. 2,
p.
137.
Williams, Valerie S. L.
Pommerich, Mary
and
Thissen, David
1998.
A Comparison of Developmental Scales Based on Thurstone Methods and Item Response Theory.
Journal of Educational Measurement,
Vol. 35,
Issue. 2,
p.
93.
Bielinski, John
and
Davison, Mark L.
1998.
Gender Differences by Item Difficulty Interactions in Multiple-Choice Mathematics Items.
American Educational Research Journal,
Vol. 35,
Issue. 3,
p.
455.
Camilli, Gregory
1999.
Measurement Error, Multidimensionality, and Scale Shrinkage: A Reply to Yen and Burket.
Journal of Educational Measurement,
Vol. 36,
Issue. 1,
p.
73.