We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Cleary, T.A., Humphreys, L.G., Kendrick, S.A., Wesman, A. (1975). Educational uses of tests with disadvantaged students. American Psychologist, 30, 15–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gottfredson, L.S. (1997). Mainstream science on intelligence: An editorial with 52 signatories, history, and bibliography. Intelligence, 24, 13–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Humphreys, L.G. (1939). The effect of random alternation of reinforcement on the acquisition and extinction of conditioned eyelid reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 25, 141–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Humphreys, L.G. (1949). Test purity. American Psychologist, 3, 245–245.Google Scholar
Humphreys, L.G. (1960). Note on the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 57, 86–88.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Humphreys, L.G. (1962). The organization of human abilities. American Psychologist, 17, 475–483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Humphreys, L.G. (1985). General intelligence: An integration of factor, test, and simplex theory. In Wolman, B.B. (Eds.), Handbook of intelligence: Theories, measurements, and applications (pp. 201–224). New York, NY: Wiley.Google Scholar
Humphreys, L.G. (1988). Trends in levels of academic achievement of blacks and other minorities. Intelligence, 12, 231–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Humphreys, L.G. (1991). Limited vision in the social sciences. American Journal of Psychology, 104, 333–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Humphreys, L.G. (1992). Commentary: What both critics and users of ability tests need to know. Psychological Science, 3, 271–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Humphreys, L.G., Lubinski, D., Yao, G. (1993). Utility of predicting group membership and the role of spatial visualization in becoming an engineer, physical scientist, or artist. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 250–261.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed