Hostname: page-component-5f745c7db-hj587 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-06T07:55:02.320Z Has data issue: true hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Measure of the Gambling Response-Set in Objective Tests

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2025

Robert C. Ziller
Robert C. Ziller*
Affiliation:
University of Delaware
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A formula is developed for measuring the gambling response-set or utility for risk in objective tests in which the testees are apprised of the application of a correction for guessing. Some implications of this measure for test theory and construction are discussed briefly.

Type
Original Paper
Information
Psychometrika , Volume 22 , Issue 3 , September 1957 , pp. 289 - 292
Copyright
Copyright © 1957 The Psychometric Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Coombs, C. H. On the use of objective examinations. Educ. psychol. Measmt, 1953, 13, 308–310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dressel, P. L. and Schmid, J. Some modifications of the multiple-choice item. Educ. psychol. Measmt, 1953, 13, 574–594CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gulliksen, H. Theory of mental tests, New York: Wiley, 1950CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loevinger, J. The attenuation paradox in test theory. Psychol. Bull., 1954, 51, 493–504CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sherriffs, A. C. and Bloomer, D. V. Who is penalized by the penalty for guessing?. J. educ. Psychol., 1954, 45, 81–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swineford, Frances The measurement of a personality trait. J. educ. Psychol., 1938, 29, 295–300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swineford, Frances Analysis of a personality trait. J. educ. Psychol., 1941, 32, 438–444CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Torrance, E. P. and Ziller, R. C. Risk and life experience development of a scale for measuring risk-taking tendencies. Lackland Air Force Base, Texas: Air Force Personnel and Training Research Center, February, 1957. (Research Report, AFPTRC-TN-57-23, ASTIA, Document No. 07892C.)Google Scholar
Votaw, D. F. The effect of do-not-guess directions on the validity of true-false or multiple choice tests. J. educ. Psychol., 1936, 27, 698–703CrossRefGoogle Scholar