Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-s22k5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-08T16:12:26.505Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Osgood and Suci's Measure of Pattern Similarity and Q-Technique Factor Analysis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2025

James M. Sakoda
James M. Sakoda*
Affiliation:
University of Connecticut
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to show that a relationship can be established between Osgood and Suci's D based on raw scores and scores obtained from factor analysis data without equalizing the means and variances of each individual's set of scores.

Type
Original Paper
Information
Psychometrika , Volume 19 , Issue 3 , September 1954 , pp. 253 - 256
Copyright
Copyright © 1954 The Psychometric Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Cattell, Raymond B. Factor analysis, New York: Harper, 1952Google Scholar
Gaier, Eugene L., Lee, Marilyn C. Pattern analysis: the configurational approach to predictive measurement. Psychol. Bull., 1953, 50, 140–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osgood, Charles E., Suci, George J. A measure of relation determined by both mean difference and profile information. Psychol. Bull., 1952, 49, 251–262CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rao, C. Radhakrishna. Advanced statistical methods in biometric research, New York: Wiley, 1952Google Scholar
Stephenson, William. The study of behavior, Q-technique and its methodology, Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press, 1953Google Scholar
Thomson, Sir Godfrey. The factorial analysis of human ability, New York: Houghton Mifflin, 1951Google Scholar
Webster, Harold. A note on profile similarity. Psychol. Bull., 1952, 49, 538–539CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed