Hostname: page-component-5f745c7db-q8b2h Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-06T06:22:36.437Z Has data issue: true hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Remark on Tucker and Messick's “Points of View” Analysis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2025

John Ross
John Ross*
Affiliation:
The University of Western Australia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

It is shown that to combine readings from “points of view” configurations as assumed in Tucker and Messick's model is not to combine configurations in any simple way. Both empirical and logical consequences of the disparity are discussed.

Type
Article
Information
Psychometrika , Volume 31 , Issue 1 , March 1966 , pp. 27 - 31
Copyright
Copyright © 1966 Psychometric Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Eckart, C. and Young, G. The approximation of one matrix by another of lower rank. Psychometrika, 1936, 1, 211–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ross, J. Mean performance and the factor analysis of learning data. Psychometrika, 1964, 29, 67–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tucker, L. R. Determination of parameters of a functional relationship by factor analysis. Psychometrika, 1958, 23, 19–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tucker, L. R and Messick, S. An individual difference model for multidimensional scaling. Psychometrika, 1963, 28, 333–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weitzman, R. A. A factor analytic method for investigating differences between groups of individual learning curves. Psychometrika, 1963, 28, 69–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar