Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-l4dxg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-07T18:56:45.266Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Thurstone's Analytical Method for Simple Structure and a Mass Modification Thereof

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2025

Robert R. Sokal
Robert R. Sokal*
Affiliation:
University of Kansas
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The analytical method for simple structure proposed by Thurstone is applied to four separate cases and found to yield satisfactory results. The simple structure obtained by Thurstone's method is found to match closely that obtained by other methods and corresponds to the true structure of the matrix in those cases where true structure is known. Difficulties about the choice of the correct trial vector led the writer to develop a modification of Thurstone's method, useful where high speed computational facilities are available. Instructions are given for this so-called mass modification, and the procedure is illustrated with a 5-factor, 14-variable example. While the results do not fully correspond to a previous graphical solution, it can be argued that the results obtained by the new method show an improved simple structure. The modified method is applied to three other correlation matrices, yielding in each case a satisfactory simple structure.

Type
Original Paper
Information
Psychometrika , Volume 23 , Issue 3 , September 1958 , pp. 237 - 257
Copyright
Copyright © 1958 The Psychometric Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Contribution No. 961 from the Department of Entomology, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas.

†

Most of the work on which this paper is based was performed during the summer of 1956 when the author was the holder of an Elizabeth Watkins Faculty Scholarship granted by the Kansas University Endowment Association. The work was carried out at the University of Illinois, where the author was privileged to spend the tenure of this scholarship. The writer is indebted to Professor L. H. Lanier, the Chairman of the Psychology Department, who graciously placed space and equipment at his disposal, and to Professor Raymond B. Cattell for his continuing encouragement of and interest in the author's work. Some of the computations were performed on the ILLIAC digital computer. The many courtesies extended by Professor J. J. Nash, Director of the Digital Computer Laboratory of the University of Illinois, are gratefully acknowledged. The writer is indebted to Mr. John R. Hurley for much assistance during the development of the computational routines and for a critical reading of this paper. Expenses in connection with the work were met by a General Research Grant of the University of Kansas.

References

Carroll, J. B. An analytical solution for approximating simple structure in factor analysis. Psychometrika, 1953, 18, 23–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cattell, R. B. and Cattell, A. K. S. Factor rotation for proportional profiles: analytical solution and an example. Brit. J. statist. Psychol., 1955, 8, 81–91.Google Scholar
Ferguson, G. A. The concept of parsimony in factor analysis. Psychometrika, 1954, 19, 281–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fruchter, B. Factor analysis, New York: Van Nostrand, 1954.Google Scholar
Johnson, D. M. and Reynolds, F. A factor analysis of verbal ability. Psychol. Rec., 1941, 4, 183–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neuhaus, J. O. and Wrigley, C. The quartimax method: an analytical approach to orthogonal simple structure. Brit. J. statist. Psychol., 1954, 7, 88–92.Google Scholar
Pinzka, C. and Saunders, D. R. Analytic rotation to simple structure, II: Extension to an oblique solution. Educational Testing Service Bulletin, RB-54-31, 1954. (Multilithed)Google Scholar
Saunders, D. R. An analytical method for rotation to orthogonal simple structure. Educational Testing Service Bulletin, RB-53-10, 1953. Amer. Psychologist, 1953, 8, 428. (Abstract))Google Scholar
Sokal, R. R. Quantification of systematic relationships and of phylogenetic trends. Montreal: Proc. Tenth Internat. Congr. Entomology, 1958, in press.Google Scholar
Sokal, R. R. A comparison of five tests for completeness of factor extraction. 1958, (in preparation).Google Scholar
Stroud, C. P. An application of factor analysis to the systematics of Kalotermes. Syst. Zool., 1953, 2, 75–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thurstone, L. L. An analytical method for simple structure. Psychometrika, 1954, 19, 173–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tucker, L. R. The objective definition of simple structure in linear factor analysis. Psychometrika, 1955, 20, 209–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, S. General, group, and special size factors. Genetics, 1932, 17, 603–619.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wright, S. The interpretation of multivariate systems. Statistics and mathematics in biology, Ames, Iowa: Iowa State College Press, 1954.Google Scholar