Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-cphqk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-07T19:06:06.251Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Two-Alternative Learning Situations with Partial Reinforcement

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2025

Mary I. Hanania*
Affiliation:
University of California, Berkeley

Abstract

The comparative effects of reward and nonreward on learning are considered in connection with a two-alternative learning situation. Conditions are more general in nature than those discussed in an earlier article. In the statistical model proposed, the question of whether reward and nonreward are equivalent in their effects on learning reduces to testing a composite hypothesis on a multivariate probability distribution. An asymptotic test of this hypothesis is described, and its use is illustrated with data from psychological experiments.

Type
Original Paper
Copyright
Copyright © 1960 The Psychometric Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

This paper was prepared with the partial support of the Office of Naval Research, and may be reproduced in whole or in part for any purpose of the United States government.

I wish to express my gratitude to Professors J. Neyman and E. L. Scott of the University of California, Department of Statistics, for their constant assistance and encouragement throughout the research that led to this paper and during its preparation, and to Professor F. W. Irwin of the University of Pennsylvania Department of Psychology for his many helpful suggestions and comments.

Presently at the American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon.

References

Bush, R. R. and Mosteller, F.. Stochastic models for learning, New York: Wiley, 1955.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanania, M. Some statistical tests of hypotheses on the effect of reward in learning, Berkeley: Univ. California, 1957.Google Scholar
Hanania, M. I. A generalization of the Bush-Mosteller model with some significance tests. Psychometrika, 1959, 24, 5368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neyman, J. Sur une famille de tests asymptotiques des hypothèses statistiques composées. Trabajos de Estadística, 1954, 5, 161168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodnow, J. J. and Postman, L.. Probability learning in a problem solving situation. J. exp. Psychol., 1955, 49, 1622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar