Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-mzp66 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-07T18:28:05.823Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Validity of the Successive Intervals Method of Psychometric Scaling

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2025

William W. Rozeboom  and
Lyle V. Jones
William W. Rozeboom
Affiliation:
University of Chicago
Lyle V. Jones
Affiliation:
University of Chicago
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The degree to which scale values computed by the method of successive intervals diverge from theoretically “true” values is seen to be due to three types of error: error due to inequalities in variances of the distributions from which the scale values are computed, error due to non-normality of the distributions, and sampling error. The contribution of each type of error to the total error is evaluated; the latter is seen to be surprisingly small under appropriate conditions. Certain aspects of the formal methodology underlying scaling procedures are also briefly considered.

Type
Original Paper
Information
Psychometrika , Volume 21 , Issue 2 , June 1956 , pp. 165 - 183
Copyright
Copyright © 1956 The Psychometric Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

This paper reports research undertaken in cooperation with the Quartermaster Food and Container Institute for the Armed Forces, and has been assigned number 475 in the series of papers approved for publication. The views or conclusions contained in this report are those of the authors. They are not to be construed as necessarily reflecting the views or indorsement of the Department of Defense.

References

Attneave, F. A. A method of graded dichotomies for the scaling of judgments. Psychol. Rev., 1949, 56, 334–340CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Edwards, A. L. The scaling of stimuli by the method of successive intervals. J. appl. Psychol., 1952, 36, 118–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, A. L.,and Thurstone, L. L. An internal consistency check for scale values determined by the method of successive intervals. Psychometrika, 1952, 17, 169–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garner, W. R., and Hake, H. W. The amount of information in absolute judgments. Psychol. Rev., 1951, 58, 446–459CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guilford, J. P. The computation of psychological values from judgments in absolute categories. J. exp. Psychol., 1938, 22, 32–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guilford, J. P. Psychometric methods 2nd ed., (pp. 223–262). New York: McGraw-Hill, 1954Google Scholar
Mosier, C. I. A modification of the method of successive intervals. Psychometrika, 1940, 6, 101–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saffir, M. A. A comparative study of scales constructed by three psychophysical methods. Psychometrika, 1937, 2, 179–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stevens, S. S. Mathematics, measurements, and psychophysics. In Stevens, S. S. (Eds.), Handbook of experimental psychology, New York: Wiley, 1951Google Scholar
Thurstone, L. L. A law of comparative judgment. Psychol. Rev., 1927, 34, 273–286CrossRefGoogle Scholar