Hostname: page-component-5f745c7db-tvc9f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-06T07:47:05.435Z Has data issue: true hasContentIssue false

The Variance of the Number of Mutual Choices in sociometry

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2025

Leo Katz
Affiliation:
Michigan State University
Thurlow R. Wilson
Affiliation:
University of New Mexico

Abstract

The variance of the number of mutual dyads in a sociometric situation where each member of a group chooses independently and at random is derived for unrestricted numbers of choices per group member, as well as for a fixed number of choices. The distribution of the number of mutuals is considered.

Type
Original Paper
Copyright
Copyright © 1956 The Psychometric Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

We are indebted to Robert Bush and Hartley Rodgers of Harvard University for helpful criticisms.

References

Bronfenbrenner, U. A constant frame of reference for sociometric research. Sociometry, 1943, 6, 363397CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crisswell, Joan H. Foundations of sociometric measurement. Sociometry, 1946, 9, 713CrossRefGoogle Scholar
David, F. N. and Kendall, M. G.. Tables of symmetric functions—part I. Biometrika, 1949, 36, 431449Google Scholar
Edwards, Daisy S. The constant frame of reference problem in sociometry. Sociometry, 1948, 11, 372379CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feller, W. Probability theory and its applications. Vol. 1, New York: Wiley, 1950Google Scholar
Loomis, C. P. and Pepinsky, H. B.. Sociometry, 1937–1947: theory and methods. Sociometry, 1948, 11, 262286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moreno, J. L. and Jennings, Helen H. Sociometric measurement of social configurations, based on deviations from chance. Sociometry Monographs, No. 3, 1945, Beacon House.Google Scholar