Hostname: page-component-5f745c7db-nzk4m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-06T07:45:37.254Z Has data issue: true hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

War-Moods: I

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2025

Lewis F. Richardson
Lewis F. Richardson*
Affiliation:
Hillside House, Kilmun, Argyll, Britain
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A person can be openly friendly, or hostile, or war-weary. Depth-psychology has shown that the underlying mood is also important. In the present theory the independent variable is time, and the dependent variables are the numbers of persons in different warmoods in two opposing nations. The rate of conversion of persons from one mood to another is taken to be proportional both to the number of susceptible persons and to the number of influencing persons, as in Kermack and McKendrick's theory of epidemics of cholera (15). This formulation leads to a set of differential equations nearly but not quite like those whereby Volterra (41) described the interaction between predator and prey among fish. Here the constants are fitted to the history of the First World War. The gregarious motive to follow a fashion of either peace or war is formulated as an amendment.

Type
Original Paper
Information
Psychometrika , Volume 13 , Issue 3 , September 1948 , pp. 147 - 174
Copyright
Copyright © 1948 The Psychometric Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

von Bernhardi, F. Germany and the next war, London: Edward Arnold, 1914.Google Scholar
British Association for the Advancement of Science. Report of the Annual Meeting, 1938, 277–334.Google Scholar
Mrs.Buxton, C. R. A weekly survey of the foreign press. Cambridge Magazine, Cambridge, England, 1915–1919.Google Scholar
Calvert, E. R. Capital punishment in the twentieth century, London: Putnams, 1930.Google Scholar
Commonsense, a London periodical current during the first world war.Google Scholar
Dumas, S. and Vedel-Petersen, K. O. Losses of life caused by war, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1923.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Encyclopaedia Britannica. New York: Encyclopaedia Britannica, Inc., 1929, edition XIV.Google Scholar
German, a. J'Accuse, trans. by Gray, A. New York and London: Hodder and Stoughton, 1915.Google Scholar
Glasgow Herald. Daily Newspaper, Glasgow, Britain.Google Scholar
Graham, J. W. Conscription and conscience, London: Allen and Unwin, 1922.Google Scholar
Hirst, F. W. The consequences of the war to Great Britain, Oxford: Univ. Press, 1934.Google Scholar
Hitler, A.Mein Kampf, translated by Murphy, J. London: Hurst and Blackett, 1939.Google Scholar
James, W. The varieties of religious experience, London: Longmans Green, 1902.Google Scholar
Keesing's Contemporary Archives, weekly periodical, Bristol, England.Google Scholar
Kermack, W. O. and McKendrick, A. G. Mathematical theory of epidemics. Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A, 1927, 115, 700–722.Google Scholar
Kermack, W. O. and McKendrick, A. G. The solution of sets of simultaneous integral equations related to the equation of Volterra. Proc. Lond. Math. Soc., 1936, 41, 462–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kruger, P. Memoirs, London: Fisher Unwin, 1902.Google Scholar
Lloyd George, D. War Memoirs, London: Odhams, 1938.Google Scholar
Matthew, Sain. Gospel, Oxford: Univ. Press, 1891.Google Scholar
McCarthy, J. A history of our own times, London: Chatto and Windus, 1892.Google Scholar
Mendelssohn Bartholdy, A. The war and German society, New Haven: Yale Univ. Press, 1937.Google Scholar
Mole, G. The ignition of explosive gases. Proc. Phys. Soc. Lond., 1936, 48, 857–864.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nernst, W. Theoretical chemistry, London: Macmillan, 1923.Google Scholar
Parliamentary debates, official report (alias Hansard). London: H. M. Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Pear, T. H. Peace, war and culture patterns. Bulletin of the John Rylands Library, 1948, 31, 3–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Plato. Timaeus.Google Scholar
Rashevsky, N. Mathematical theory of human relations, Bloomington, Indiana: Principia Press, 1947.Google Scholar
Richardson, L. F. Mathematical psychology of war, Oxford: Wm. Hunt, 1919.Google Scholar
Richardson, L. F. The behavior of an Osglim lamp. Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A, 1937, 163, 380–390.Google Scholar
Richardson, L. F. Generalized foreign politics. British J. Psychol. Monog. Supplt. No. 23, 1939.Google Scholar
Richardson, L. F. The number of nations on each side of a war. J. Roy. Statistical Soc., 1946, 109, 130–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richardson, L. F. Arms and insecurity, a microfilm, 35 mm. Kilmun, Argyll, Britain: from the author, $5, 1947.Google Scholar
Semenoff, N. Chemical kinetics and chain reactions, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1935.Google Scholar
Soviet Union, official history of the communist party of the. Moscow: Foreign Languages Publishing House, 1939.Google Scholar
Spillane, J. P. In E., Mille.(Eds.), The neuroses in war, London: Macmillan, 1940.Google Scholar
Times, The. Daily newspaper, London.Google Scholar
Trotter, W. Instincts of the herd in war and peace, London: Fisher Unwin, 1921.Google Scholar
U. D. C., a periodical. London: Union of Democratic Control.Google Scholar
Vedel-Petersen, see Dumas.Google Scholar
Volterra, V. In Fantippié, (Eds.), Theory of functionals, Glasgow: Blackie & Son, 1930.Google Scholar
Volterra, V. Leçons sur la théorie mathématique de la lutte pour la vie, Paris: Gauthier-Villars, 1931.Google Scholar
Wright, M. B. In E., Mille.(Eds.), The neuroses in war, London: Macmillan, 1940.Google Scholar