Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-gr6zb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-27T02:25:43.154Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Y. Ahmavaara and T. Markkanen. The Unified Factor Model. Its Position in Psychometric Theory and Application to Sociological Alcohol Study. Vol. 7. Helsinki: The Finnish Foundation for Alcohol Studies, 1958. Pp. 187. Stockholm: Almqvist and Wiksell, distributors.

Review products

Y. Ahmavaara and T. Markkanen. The Unified Factor Model. Its Position in Psychometric Theory and Application to Sociological Alcohol Study. Vol. 7. Helsinki: The Finnish Foundation for Alcohol Studies, 1958. Pp. 187. Stockholm: Almqvist and Wiksell, distributors.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2025

Rolf Bargmann
Rolf Bargmann*
Affiliation:
Virginia Polytechnic Institute
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Review
Information
Psychometrika , Volume 25 , Issue 1 , March 1960 , pp. 109 - 113
Copyright
Copyright © 1960 The Psychometric Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Festinger, L. The treatment of qualitative data by scale analysis. Psychol. Bull., 1947, 44, 149–161.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Green, B. F. Attitude measurement. In Lindzey, G. (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology. Cambridge, Mass.: Addison Wesley, 1954, 335–369..Google Scholar
Guilford, J. P. Psychometric methods (2nd ed.), New York: McGraw-Hill, 1954.Google Scholar
Guttman, L. On Festinger's evaluation of scale analysis. Psychol. Bull., 1947, 44, 451–465.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Likert, R. A technique for the measurement of attitude scales. Arch. Psychol., 1932, No. 140..Google Scholar
Menzel, H. A new coefficient for scalogram analysis. Publ. Opin. Quart., 1953, 17, 268–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitra, S. K. Contributions to the statistical analysis of categorical data. Univ. North Carolina, Inst. Statist. Mimeo. Ser. No. 142, 1955.Google Scholar
Roy, S. N. and Kastenbaum, M. A generalization of analysis of variance and multivariate analysis to data based on frequencies in qualitative categories or class intervals. Univ. North Carolina, Inst. Statist. Mimeo. Ser. No. 131, 1955..Google Scholar
Stevens, S. S. On the theory of scales of measurement. Science, 1946, 103, 670–680.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stouffer, S. A., Guttman, L., Suchman, E. A., and Lazarsfeld, P. F. Measurement and prediction. Studies in social psychology during World War II, Vol. 4, Princeton: Princeton Univ. Press, 1950.Google Scholar
Stouffer, S. A., Borgatta, E. F., Hays, D. G., and Henry, A. F.. A technique for improving cumulative scales Publ. Opin. Quart., 1952, 16, 273–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Torgerson, W. S. Theory and methods of scaling, New York: Wiley, 1958.Google Scholar