Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T06:34:01.432Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Gender heterogeneity in the association between lifestyles and non-fatal acute myocardial infarction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 October 2009

Andreia Oliveira*
Affiliation:
Department of Hygiene and Epidemiology and Cardiovascular Research & Development Unit, University of Porto Medical School, Alameda Prof. Hernâni Monteiro 4200-319 Porto, Portugal
*
*Corresponding author: Email acmatos@med.up.pt
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objective

To evaluate the modification effect of sex in the association between lifestyles and acute myocardial infarction (AMI).

Design

Population-based case–control study. Trained interviewers collected information using a standard structured questionnaire. Associations were estimated using unconditional logistic regression. The effect modification by sex was evaluated in the regression models, testing interaction terms between lifestyles and sex.

Setting

Porto, Portugal.

Subjects

Portuguese Caucasian adults, aged ≥18 years. Cases were patients consecutively admitted with an incident AMI during 1999–2003 (n 918) and controls were a representative sample of non-institutionalized inhabitants of Porto with no evidence of previous clinical or silent infarction (n 2316).

Results

Cigarette smoking was positively associated with AMI in both men and women (smokers >15 cigarettes/d v. never smokers: OR = 9·11, 95 % CI 4·83, 17·20 for women; OR = 3·92, 95 % CI 2·75, 5·58 for men; interaction term P value = 0·001). A significant protective effect of moderate alcohol intake on AMI occurrence was found in women (0·1–15·0 g/d v. non-drinkers: OR = 0·48, 95 % CI 0·31, 0·74), but not in men. Fruit and vegetable intake, vitamin and mineral supplement use and leisure-time physical activity practice were found to decrease AMI risk, with similar effects between sexes.

Conclusions

A strong positive association between smoking and AMI was found in women. Also, a protective effect of moderate alcohol intake was only found among females. Fruit and vegetable intake, vitamin and mineral supplement use and leisure-time physical activity practice were found to decrease AMI risk in both sexes.

Type
Research Paper
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2009

CHD is the result of a complex interplay between genetic features and social and behavioural exposures(Reference Topol, Smith, Plow and Wang1, Reference Yusuf, Reddy, Ounpuu and Anand2), but differences across populations appear to be more related with lifestyles than with genetic make-up(Reference Marmot3, Reference Yusuf, Reddy, Ounpuu and Anand4). The modifiable pattern and the considerably high population-attributable risk of lifestyles to the development of CHD(Reference Yusuf, Hawken and Ounpuu5) underline the importance of still studying these associations in populations with different ranges of exposures.

Smoking is considered the most important risk factor for CHD, particularly among young adults(Reference Panagiotakos, Rallidis, Pitsavos, Stefanadis and Kremastinos6), but the relative importance between sexes is not very clear. Studies have pointed out the particularly harmful effect of smoking among women(Reference Doughty, Mehta, Bruckman, Das, Karavite, Tsai and Eagle7, Reference Ismail, Jafar, Jafary, White, Faruqui and Chaturvedi8), but also some studies describe it as a major hazard for acute myocardial infarction (AMI), regardless of sex(Reference Nyboe, Jensen, Appleyard and Schnohr9, Reference Vriz, Nesbitt, Krause, Majahalme, Lu and Julius10).

A large number of observational studies have shown a J-shaped relationship between moderate alcohol consumption and CHD(Reference O’Keefe, Bybee and Lavie11), but less information is available about the effect of higher levels of consumption. In populations with high levels of alcohol intake, such as those of the Eastern European countries, the effect of alcohol has been frequently studied in relation to total mortality(Reference Chenet, McKee, Leon, Shkolnikov and Vassin12) but not the occurrence of disease. Portugal has a considerably wide range of alcohol exposure and the highest levels of alcohol consumption among European countries(13), particularly among men, which improves the study of this association in this specific population.

Fruit and vegetable intake represents a marker of healthy dietary intake and has been described as protective for some CVD(Reference Dauchet, Amouyel, Hercberg and Dallongeville14). The current recommended intake of 5 or more portions of fruit and vegetables daily is widespread throughout the world, but the evaluation of this specific cut-off point in the reduction of disease risk is frequently neglected, as are sex-related differences.

Several studies have studied the effect of total physical activity on the prevention of CHD(Reference Berlin and Colditz15, Reference Suminski, Poston, Foreyt and St Jeor16), but few focus specifically on clarifying the differences between total and leisure-time physical expenditure on this association.

Overall, the profile of risk factors for CHD appears to be somewhat different between sexes(Reference Reuterwall, Hallqvist, Ahlbom, De Faire, Diderichsen, Hogstedt, Pershagen, Theorell, Wiman and Wolk17, Reference Welty18), but the differences are quantitatively limited and inconsistent across studies. Most studies do not evaluate by appropriate statistical methods differences by sex nor study a broad range of lifestyles on AMI risk within the same population. The modifiable profile of lifestyles together with a better understanding of these associations enhances the development of effective targeted public health interventions to prevent myocardial infarction events.

The aim of the present study was to evaluate the modification effect of sex in the association between lifestyles and AMI.

Methods

Study design and sample selection

A population-based case–control study was conducted during 1999–2003 in Porto, a large urban centre in the north-west of Portugal with almost 300 000 inhabitants. All participants were Portuguese Caucasian adults, aged ≥18 years.

Cases were patients consecutively admitted to the Cardiology Department of the four hospitals providing acute coronary care in Porto, who survived beyond the fourth day after a first diagnosis of an AMI. The diagnosis was established considering infarction with and without ST segment elevation and according to standard criteria(Reference Alpert, Thygesen, Antman and Bassand19).

Controls were identified as part of a health and nutrition survey of a representative sample of the non-institutionalized adult population of Porto (the EPIPorto study), selected by random digit dialling. Refusals were not substituted and the participation proportion was estimated as 70 % (66·3 % in women and 74·7 % in men)(Reference Ramos, Lopes and Barros20).

A rapid evaluation of cognitive function was done using the Mini-Mental State Examination test (MMSE)(Reference Folstein, Folstein and McHush21) in participants older than 64 years.

During the study period, 1248 patients with an incident AMI were identified, but some were excluded because they were unable to collaborate (n 67), died (n 37), did not complete the interview (n 85), or scored less than 24 in the MMSE (n 138). Only three refused to participate.

Out of 2485 community participants, 114 (4·6 %) were excluded due to previous clinical or silent infarction according to self-reported data and/or a 12-lead electrocardiogram, nine due to incomplete information or physical disability, and forty-six because they scored less than 24 in the MMSE test. The final sample included 3234 subjects: 918 cases (222 women and 696 men) and 2316 controls (1449 women and 867 men).

The Ethics Committees of the four participating hospitals approved the study protocol and every participant gave written informed consent.

Data collection and definition of variables

Data on cases and controls were collected by the same set of trained interviewers, using a standard structured questionnaire that included information on social, demographic, anthropometric and behavioural characteristics.

Patients were interviewed during the hospital stay, after clinical stabilization, and controls were invited to visit the department to be evaluated by face-to-face interviews.

Smoking

Smoking habits were self-reported and participants were classified, based on the WHO categories(Reference Rosenbaum, Leibel and Hirsch22), into never smokers, current daily smokers (at least one cigarette a day), current occasional smokers (less than one cigarette a day) and ex-smokers (quit smoking for least 6 months). The cut-off point for exposure categories was set at 15 cigarettes/d instead of 20 cigarettes/d (a pack of cigarettes) to minimize digit preference bias.

Dietary intake and alcohol consumption

Dietary intake and alcohol consumption were estimated by a validated eighty-two-item semi-quantitative FFQ covering the previous year(Reference Lopes, Aro, Azevedo, Ramos and Barros23, Reference Lopes24). Information on nutrient intake was obtained using the software Food Processor Plus® (ESHA Research, Salem, OR, USA), which has been adapted to Portuguese food and national traditional dishes.

Different classes of alcohol consumption were defined by the cut-off points 15·0 and 30·0 g/d for women and 30·0 and 60·0 g/d for men, according to the guidelines of the American Heart Association(Reference Krauss, Eckel and Howard25). For women and men respectively, participants with an alcohol intake at or below 15·0 and 30·0 g/d were considered moderate alcohol drinkers and those with intake levels above 30·0 and 60·0 g/d were considered as excessive alcohol drinkers.

For total energy intake, participants were classified according to the quartile distribution in controls.

Fruit and vegetable intake was stratified into <5 and ≥5 portions/d, according to the current recommendations of 400 g of daily consumption. Only fresh fruit, natural fruit juice, fresh vegetables and vegetable soup were considered for the definition of the fruit and vegetable intake variable.

Vitamin and mineral supplements

Vitamin and mineral supplement use referred to chronic consumption (more than two consecutive weeks) during the year before the interview.

Physical activity

Total physical activity was quantified after a detailed recall of professional, domestic and leisure-time physical activities and was expressed as metabolic equivalents(Reference Gal, Santos and Barros26). Participants were classified according to the quartile distribution of physical activity in controls. Leisure-time physical activity practice was also asked and defined as a regular practice of any leisure-time physical activity, including walking.

Medical history

A positive family history of AMI was considered when at least one first-degree relative had had an AMI or had suddenly died by unknown cause, regardless of the age when the event occurred.

Anthropometrics

Anthropometric variables were obtained with subjects fasting, in light clothing and barefoot. Body height was measured to the nearest 0·1 kilogram using a digital scale (SECA®) and height was measured to the nearest centimetre using a wall stadiometer (SECA®). Waist circumference was measured to the nearest centimetre, midway between the lower limit of the rib cage and the iliac crest, using a flexible and non-distensible tape. The waist circumference was categorized into <88 cm and ≥88 cm for women and <102 cm and ≥102 cm for men, according to the Adult Treatment Panel (ATP III) guidelines.

Statistical analysis

The χ 2 was used to compare categorical variables and the Mann–Whitney test was computed to compare continuous variables between two independent samples. The distribution of variables was tested by the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test.

The associations between lifestyles and AMI were estimated by crude and adjusted odds ratios and respective 95 % confidence intervals, using unconditional logistic regression models. Adjustments were made for age and education (continuous variables) and a final model was fitted adjusting for social, behavioural and clinical characteristics which in the crude analysis were significantly associated with AMI, i.e. age, education (as continuous variables), waist circumference, alcohol consumption, total energy intake, fruit and vegetable intake, vitamin and supplement use, leisure-time physical activity, smoking and family history of infarction (as categorical variables). For women, the final model was also adjusted for parity and menopause with and without hormone replacement therapy.

The effect modification by sex on AMI risk was evaluated in the regression models, testing interaction terms between lifestyles and sex.

Data were analysed using the STATA® statistical software package version 9·0 (StataCorp, College Station, TX, USA).

Results

Female cases of AMI were significantly older, less educated and presented higher median BMI values compared with controls (Table 1). Female cases were also more frequently current smokers, excessive alcohol drinkers (>30 g alcohol/d) and reported more often a fruit and vegetable intake of <5 portions/d, no use of vitamin and mineral supplements in the past year and not to practise regular leisure-time physical activities. Compared with controls, female cases were more frequently in the lower quartiles of energy intake and total physical activity. Male cases were also significantly less educated, had higher median BMI values and were more often current smokers and excessive alcohol drinkers (>60 g alcohol/d) compared with controls. Male cases were more frequently in the higher quartiles of energy intake and total physical activity, and about 80 % reported not practising regular leisure-time physical activities compared with about 59 % of controls. Also, cases of both sexes more often reported a family history of AMI than controls.

Table 1 Characteristics of acute myocardial infarction cases and controls by sex: adults aged ≥18 years, Porto, Portugal

P25–P75, interquartile range; W, women; M, men; MET, metabolic equivalent.

*P < 0·001 for all variables, except for BMI (P = 0·001) and total energy intake (P = 0·049).

P < 0·001 for all variables, except for age (P = 0·002), BMI (P = 0·012), waist circumference (P = 0·064) and total energy intake (P = 0·004).

‡Cut-off points defined separately by sex (88 cm for women and 102 cm for men).

§Classes defined separately by sex (15·0 and 30·0 g alcohol/d for women, 30·0 and 60·0 g alcohol/d for men).

||Quartiles defined separately by sex, according to controls’ distribution (kcal/d, for 1st, 2nd, 3rd and 4th quartile respectively: <1747·0, 1747·0–2050·1, 2050·2–2369·8 and >2369·8 for women; <1989·0, 1989·0–2315·4, 2315·5–2724·1 and >2724·1 for men; to convert to kJ, multiply kcal by 4·184).

¶Quartiles defined separately by sex, according to controls’ distribution (MET×h/day, for 1st, 2nd, 3rd and 4th quartile respectively: <33·0, 33·0–34·5, 34·6–38·2 and >38·2 for women; <32·6, 32·6–34·2, 34·3–39·3 and >39·3 for men).

The crude and adjusted odds ratio estimates for the association between lifestyles and AMI are presented in Table 2 for women and in Table 3 for men.

Table 2 Association between lifestyles and acute myocardial infarction in women: adults aged ≥18 years, Porto, Portugal

MET, metabolic equivalents.

*Odds ratio adjusted for age and education.

†Odds ratio adjusted for age, education, waist circumference, smoking, alcohol consumption, total energy intake, fruit and vegetable intake, vitamin and mineral supplement use, leisure-time physical activity, family history of infarction, parity and menopause with and without hormone replacement therapy.

‡Reference class.

Table 3 Association between lifestyles and acute myocardial infarction in men: adults aged ≥18 years, Porto, Portugal

MET, metabolic equivalents.

*Odds ratio adjusted for age and education.

†Odds ratio adjusted for age, education, waist circumference, smoking, alcohol consumption, total energy intake, fruit and vegetable intake, vitamin and mineral supplement use, leisure-time physical activity and family history of infarction.

‡Reference class.

Cigarette smoking was strongly and positively associated with AMI occurrence in both sexes. Smokers of >15 cigarettes/d had increased risk estimates compared with never smokers (OR = 9·11, 95 % CI 4·83, 17·20 for women; OR = 3·92, 95 % CI 2·75, 5·58 for men; interaction term P value <0·001). The risk estimates for ex-smokers were similar to those for never smokers.

A significant interaction effect between sex and alcohol intake on AMI risk was found (interaction term P value = 0·037). In the final model, after adjustment for a range of potential confounders (social, clinical and behavioural), women had a significant protective effect from moderate alcohol intake (≤15 g/d v. non-drinkers: OR = 0·48, 95 % CI 0·31, 0·74), but among men no significant associations were observed between alcohol intake and the occurrence of the disease.

For both sexes, the consumption of ≥5 portions of fruit and vegetable daily was inversely associated with AMI (OR = 0·64, 95 % CI 0·44, 0·95 for women and OR = 0·86, 95 % CI 0·65, 1·12 for men; interaction term P value = 0·660).

A significant inverse association was also found between vitamin and mineral supplement use and AMI occurrence for both women and men (OR = 0·49, 95 % CI 0·31, 0·78 and OR = 0·51, 95 % CI 0·34, 0·79 respectively; interaction term P value = 0·523).

Total physical activity and particularly leisure-time physical activity (OR = 0·45, 95 % CI 0·27, 0·74 for women and OR = 0·53, 95 % CI 0·40, 0·70 for men; interaction term P value = 0·468) were found to have a protective effect on AMI occurrence in both sexes.

Discussion

Smoking was positively associated with AMI in both sexes, but female current cigarette smokers presented stronger risk estimates for the occurrence of the disease. It is well established that smoking is an important risk factor for CHD, regardless of age and sex(Reference Yusuf, Hawken and Ounpuu5), with increasing risks according to the number of cigarettes smoked. Also, in the present study, smokers of ≥15 cigarettes/d had approximately a threefold increased of AMI risk than smokers of <15 cigarettes/d, both compared with never smokers. In the Framingham Study, for each 10 cigarettes smoked daily, the risk of CVD increased by 18 % in men and 31 % in women of all ages(Reference Kannel and Higgins27). Although smoking is considered a major hazard for AMI in both sexes, some studies have pointed out the particularly harmful effect of the relative oestrogen deficiency that female smokers appear to have(Reference Baron, La Vecchia and Levi28) and an interaction between oral contraceptives and smoking has also been discussed(Reference Khader, Rice, John and Abueita29). However, other studies support that in young adults there is no interaction between sex and smoking on AMI risk(Reference Nyboe, Jensen, Appleyard and Schnohr9, Reference Vriz, Nesbitt, Krause, Majahalme, Lu and Julius10, Reference Oliveira, Barros, Maciel and Lopes30). The present study also found a similar risk for AMI between ex-smokers and never smokers, supporting the beneficial effect of smoking cessation in both sexes. The Albany and Framingham combined study(Reference Doyle, Dawber, Kannel, Heslin and Kahn31) showed that one year after individuals quit smoking, the risk of CHD decreases by half and, at term, ex-smokers and never smokers face similar risks.

A statistically significant protective effect of moderate alcohol intake on AMI was found only among women. This sex difference (interaction P value = 0·037) is probably related to the distribution of exposure in the sample studied, in which women were more frequently non-drinkers and moderate alcohol drinkers than men. Among the latter, a considerable proportion had excessive alcohol habits; however, the positive association found between excessive alcohol habits and the occurrence of disease did not remain statistically significant after the final model adjustments. The use of different cut-off points to define moderate and excessive alcohol habits within sexes, as suggested by the American Heart Association guidelines, may, to some extent, limit straight comparisons within sexes.

The advisory statement of the American Heart Association Nutrition Committee points out the increased CHD risk with excessive alcohol consumption and the protective effect of moderate consumption(Reference Pearson32), which seems to be independent of the type of alcoholic beverage(Reference Di Castelnuovo, Rotondo, Iacoviello, Donati and De Gaetano33). This beneficial effect could result from an increase of HDL-cholesterol, antithrombotic actions, a reduced insulin resistance, a postprandial growth modulation of smooth muscular cells(Reference Rimm, Williams, Fosher, Criqui and Stampfer34, Reference Locher, Suter and Vetter35) or through anti-inflammatory properties(Reference Imhof and Koenig36).

The inverse association of fruit and vegetable intake with AMI found in the present study is consistent with a recent meta-analysis based on cohort studies(Reference Dauchet, Amouyel, Hercberg and Dallongeville14). In fact, accumulating evidence addressing this issue led to the current recommendation of a fruit and vegetable intake of ≥400 g/d or ≥5 portions/d based primarily on the belief that the beneficial combinations of micronutrients, antioxidants and fibre present in these foods may reduce the risk of CVD and certain cancers. Despite this inverse association found, the risk estimates were similar between sexes.

In the present study, after multivariate analysis, vitamin and mineral supplement use was found to have a protective effect on AMI occurrence, even after removing the effect of fruit and vegetable intake (included as a covariable in the final regression models). Accumulating observational evidence indicates that the use of supplements, such as antioxidant vitamins, could to some extent prevent CVD(Reference Rimm, Willett, Hu, Sampson, Colditz, Manson, Hennekens and Stampfer37). Despite the plausibility of a protective role of vitamin supplements regarding chronic diseases based on their inhibition effects of LDL-cholesterol oxidation, epidemiological findings remain controversial, since randomized clinical trials do not support this beneficial effect(Reference Kris-Etherton, Lichtenstein, Howard, Steinberg and Witztum38, Reference Miller, Pastor-Barriuso, Dalal, Riemersma, Appel and Guallar39). The considerable amount of uncontrolled and uncontrollable confounding inherent to case–control and cohort studies, such as the simple correlation of antioxidant vitamin intake from supplements and food and unmeasured or unknown non-dietary factors which protect against CHD(Reference Buring and Hennekens40), could somewhat explain this beneficial effect.

Physical activity is a well-documented protective factor for CHD(Reference Suminski, Poston, Foreyt and St Jeor16). It influences blood pressure levels, insulin resistance, BMI and serum lipid levels(Reference Pereira, Folsom, McGovern, Carpenter, Arnett, Liao, Szklo and Hutchinson41, Reference Mayer-Davis, D’Agostino, Karter, Haffner, Rewers, Saad and Bergman42), provides a better haemostatic profile(Reference Meade43) and stimulates cytokines production(Reference Kasapis and Thompson44). In fact, in the present study a beneficial effect of regular leisure-time physical activity practice was clearly revealed, similarly for both sexes. Concerning total physical activity, only subjects with moderate levels of practice seemed to be protected, probably because the upper quartile, particularly in men, is reflecting heavy professional physical activities, which have been described as not having the supposed protective effects(Reference Fransson, De Faire, Ahlbom, Reuterwall, Hallqvist and Alfredsson45). Therefore, it is believed that the benefits of physical activity are mostly focused on leisure-time physical activity rather than work-related energy expenditure.

Study strengths and limitations

Sample selection and information recall biases are known sources of error in case–control studies. To minimize it as much as possible, cases of AMI were approached during their in-hospital stay and only incident cases were considered, which should reduce potential bias resulting from behavioural modifications after the acute event. Furthermore, these cases constituted a representative sample of non-fatal AMI patients, as all diagnosed cases in Portugal are admitted to public hospitals. Given the almost universal participation of cases, any effect on risk estimates would be almost exclusively attributable to the compromise in the impaired representativeness of the control group. The relatively high participation proportion among controls and the fact that different characteristics of participants and non-participants, who were older and more frequently women, had little or no impact on the direction or magnitude of myocardial infarction risk estimates, as previous described(Reference Kawano, Soejima, Kojima, Kitagawa and Ogawa46), reduced the probability of a non-response bias.

The potential confounding effect of several covariates was allowed for in the statistical analysis. Clinical variables such as dyslipidaemia, hypertension and diabetes, known risk factors for AMI, were not presented in the final model, because they could be considered potential intermediate steps in the causal chain between behavioural risk factors and myocardial infarction. Even so, an additional model was tested with adjustment for dyslipidaemia, hypertension and diabetes, but the magnitude and significance of the estimates did not change.

Although the associations between behavioural risk factors and AMI have been investigated in depth in many different studies, most of them do not evaluate a broad range of lifestyles within the same population. Moreover, most of them do not study properly differences by sex, which limits comparisons with our study. A recent case–control study stated that major risk factors for AMI in fact differ between men and women(Reference Kawano, Soejima, Kojima, Kitagawa and Ogawa46) and most authors agree that the different risk factor profiles may account for much of the sex differences in mortality(Reference Vaccarino, Krumholz, Berkman and Horwitz47). However, in the present study a gender effect on AMI risk was found only for smoking and alcohol intake. Overall, lifestyles have a strong and important independent effect on AMI occurrence. Given the potential modifiable pattern of lifestyles, primary preventive efforts hold much promise and enhance the importance of sustained and targeted public health interventions.

Acknowledgements

The study received a grant from Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia, Portugal (POCTI/ESP/42361/2001; POCTI/SAU-ESP/61160/2004). There is no conflict of interest regarding this manuscript. The data gathering followed all the local and international ethical procedures. Each author read and approved the final manuscript. A.O. performed the statistical analysis and drafted the manuscript. H.B. conceived the study, helped to conceptualize ideas and review drafts of the manuscript. C.L. conceived the study, participated in the design of the study and interpretation of the results, and reviewed drafts of the manuscript. The authors gratefully acknowledge the Head and Staff of the Cardiology Departments of the four hospitals collaborating in the study: Hospital São João, Hospital Pedro Hispano, Centro Hospitalar Vila Nova de Gaia and Hospital Geral Santo António.

References

1.Topol, EJ, Smith, J, Plow, EF & Wang, QK (2006) Genetic susceptibility to myocardial infarction and coronary artery disease. Hum Mol Genet 15, 117123.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2.Yusuf, S, Reddy, S, Ounpuu, S & Anand, S (2001) Global burden of cardiovascular diseases: Part I: general considerations, the epidemiologic transition, risk factors, and impact of urbanization. Circulation 104, 27462753.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3.Marmot, MG (1998) Diet and disease, and Durkheim and Dasgupta, and Deuteronomy. Epidemiology 9, 676680.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Yusuf, S, Reddy, S, Ounpuu, S & Anand, S (2001) Global burden of cardiovascular diseases: Part II: variations in cardiovascular disease by specific ethnic groups and geographic regions and prevention strategies. Circulation 104, 28552864.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5.Yusuf, S, Hawken, S, Ounpuu, S et al. (2004) Effect of potentially modifiable risk factors associated with myocardial infarction in 52 countries (the INTERHEART study): case–control study. Lancet 364, 937952.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6.Panagiotakos, DB, Rallidis, LS, Pitsavos, C, Stefanadis, C & Kremastinos, D (2006) Cigarette smoking and myocardial infarction in young men and women: a case–control study. Int J Cardiol 116, 371375.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7.Doughty, M, Mehta, R, Bruckman, D, Das, S, Karavite, D, Tsai, T & Eagle, K (2002) Acute myocardial infarction in the young – The University of Michigan experience. Am Heart J 143, 5662.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Ismail, J, Jafar, TH, Jafary, FH, White, F, Faruqui, AM & Chaturvedi, N (2004) Risk factors for non-fatal myocardial infarction in young South Asian adults. Heart 90, 259263.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9.Nyboe, J, Jensen, G, Appleyard, M & Schnohr, P (1991) Smoking and the risk of first acute myocardial infarction. Am Heart J 122, 438447.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10.Vriz, O, Nesbitt, S, Krause, L, Majahalme, S, Lu, H & Julius, S (1997) Smoking is associated with higher cardiovascular risk in young women than in men: the Tecumseh Blood Pressure Study. J Hypertens 15, 127134.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11.O’Keefe, JH, Bybee, KA & Lavie, CJ (2007) Alcohol and cardiovascular health: the razor-sharp double-edged sword. J Am Coll Cardiol 50, 10091014.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12.Chenet, L, McKee, M, Leon, D, Shkolnikov, V & Vassin, S (1998) Alcohol and cardiovascular mortality in Moscow; new evidence of a causal association. J Epidemiol Community Health 52, 772774.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13.Anon. (2005) World Drink Trends 2005. A Carefully Distilled Collection of Global Drinks Data. Hampshire: World Advertising Research Center.Google Scholar
14.Dauchet, L, Amouyel, P, Hercberg, S & Dallongeville, J (2006) Fruit and vegetable consumption and risk of coronary heart disease: a meta-analysis of cohort studies. J Nutr 136, 25882593.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15.Berlin, JA & Colditz, GA (1990) A meta-analysis of physical activity in the prevention of coronary heart disease. Am J Epidemiol 132, 612628.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16.Suminski, RR, Poston, WS, Foreyt, JP & St Jeor, S (2008) Physical activity assessed with three different methods and the Framingham Risk Score on 10-year coronary heart disease risk. Med Sci Monit 14, CR1CR9.Google ScholarPubMed
17.Reuterwall, C, Hallqvist, J, Ahlbom, A, De Faire, U, Diderichsen, F, Hogstedt, C, Pershagen, G, Theorell, T, Wiman, B & Wolk, A (1999) Higher relative, but lower absolute risks of myocardial infarction in women than in men: analysis of some major risk factors in the SHEEP study. The SHEEP Study Group. J Intern Med 246, 161174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18.Welty, FK (2001) Women and cardiovascular risk. Am J Cardiol 88, 48J52J.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
19.Alpert, JS, Thygesen, K, Antman, E & Bassand, JP (2000) Myocardial infarction redefined – a consensus document of the Joint European Society of Cardiology/American College of Cardiology Committee for the redefinition of myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol 36, 959969.Google Scholar
20.Ramos, E, Lopes, C & Barros, H (2004) Investigating the effect of nonparticipation using a population-based case–control study on myocardial infarction. Ann Epidemiol 14, 437441.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
21.Folstein, M, Folstein, S & McHush, R (1975) ‘Mini-mental state’. A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res 12, 189198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22.Rosenbaum, M, Leibel, RL & Hirsch, J (1997) Obesity. N Engl J Med 337, 396407.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
23.Lopes, C, Aro, A, Azevedo, A, Ramos, E & Barros, H (2007) Intake and adipose tissue composition of fatty acids and risk of myocardial infarction in a male Portuguese community sample. J Am Diet Assoc 107, 276286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
24.Lopes, C (2000) Reproducibility and validation of a food-frequency questionnaire. In Diet and acute myocardial infarction: a population-based case–control study, pp. 79–115. PhD Thesis, University of Porto.Google Scholar
25.Krauss, RM, Eckel, RH, Howard, B et al. (2000) AHA Dietary Guidelines: revision 2000: a statement for healthcare professionals from the Nutrition Committee of the American Heart Association. Circulation 102, 22842299.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
26.Gal, DL, Santos, AC & Barros, H (2005) Leisure-time versus full-day energy expenditure: a cross-sectional study of sedentarism in a Portuguese urban population. BMC Public Health 5, 16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
27.Kannel, WB & Higgins, M (1990) Smoking and hypertension as predictors of cardiovascular risk in population studies. J Hypertens 8, Suppl. 5, 38.Google ScholarPubMed
28.Baron, JA, La Vecchia, C & Levi, F (1990) The antiestrogenic effect of cigarette smoking in women. Am J Obstet Gynecol 162, 502514.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
29.Khader, YS, Rice, J, John, L & Abueita, O (2003) Oral contraceptives use and the risk of myocardial infarction: a meta-analysis. Contraception 68, 1117.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
30.Oliveira, A, Barros, H, Maciel, MJ & Lopes, C (2007) Tobacco smoking and acute myocardial infarction in young adults: a population-based case–control study. Prev Med 44, 311316.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
31.Doyle, JT, Dawber, TR, Kannel, WB, Heslin, AS & Kahn, HA (1988) Cigarette smoking and coronary heart disease. Combined experience of the Albany and Framingham studies. N Engl J Med 266, 796801.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
32.Pearson, TA (1996) Alcohol and heart disease. Circulation 94, 30233025.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
33.Di Castelnuovo, A, Rotondo, S, Iacoviello, L, Donati, MB & De Gaetano, G (2002) Meta-analysis of wine and beer consumption in relation to vascular risk. Circulation 105, 28362844.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
34.Rimm, EB, Williams, P, Fosher, K, Criqui, M & Stampfer, MJ (1999) Moderate alcohol intake and lower risk of coronary heart disease: meta-analysis of effects on lipids and haemostatic factors. BMJ 319, 15231528.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
35.Locher, R, Suter, PM & Vetter, W (1998) Ethanol suppresses smooth muscle cell proliferation in the postprandial state: a new antiatherosclerotic mechanism of ethanol? Am J Clin Nutr 67, 338341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
36.Imhof, A & Koenig, W (2003) Alcohol inflammation and coronary heart disease. Addict Biol 8, 271277.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
37.Rimm, EB, Willett, WC, Hu, FB, Sampson, L, Colditz, GA, Manson, JE, Hennekens, C & Stampfer, MJ (1998) Folate and vitamin B6 from diet and supplements in relation to risk of coronary heart disease among women. JAMA 279, 359364.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
38.Kris-Etherton, PM, Lichtenstein, AH, Howard, BV, Steinberg, D & Witztum, JL (2004) Antioxidant vitamin supplements and cardiovascular disease. Circulation 110, 637641.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
39.Miller, ER, Pastor-Barriuso, R, Dalal, D, Riemersma, RA, Appel, LJ & Guallar, E (2005) Meta-analysis: high-dosage vitamin E supplementation may increase all-cause mortality. Ann Intern Med 142, 3746.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
40.Buring, JE & Hennekens, CH (1997) Antioxidant vitamins and cardiovascular disease. Nutr Rev 55, S53.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
41.Pereira, MA, Folsom, AR, McGovern, PG, Carpenter, M, Arnett, DK, Liao, D, Szklo, M & Hutchinson, RG (1999) Physical activity and incident hypertension in black and white adults: the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study. Prev Med 28, 304312.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
42.Mayer-Davis, EJ, D’Agostino, R, Karter, AJ, Haffner, SM, Rewers, MJ, Saad, M & Bergman, RN (1998) Intensity and amount of physical activity in relation to insulin sensitivity: the Insulin Resistance Atherosclerosis Study. JAMA 279, 669674.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
43.Meade, TW (1995) Exercise and haemostatic function. J Cardiovasc Risk 2, 323329.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
44.Kasapis, C & Thompson, PD (2005) The effects of physical activity on serum C-reactive protein and inflammatory markers: a systematic review. J Am Coll Cardiol 45, 15631569.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
45.Fransson, E, De Faire, U, Ahlbom, A, Reuterwall, C, Hallqvist, J & Alfredsson, L (2004) The risk of acute myocardial infarction: interactions of types of physical activity. Epidemiology 15, 573582.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
46.Kawano, H, Soejima, H, Kojima, S, Kitagawa, A & Ogawa, H (2006) Sex differences of risk factors for acute myocardial infarction in Japanese patients. Circ J 70, 513517.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
47.Vaccarino, V, Krumholz, HM, Berkman, LF & Horwitz, RI (1995) Sex differences in mortality after myocardial infarction. Is there evidence for an increased risk for women? Circulation 91, 18611871.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Figure 0

Table 1 Characteristics of acute myocardial infarction cases and controls by sex: adults aged ≥18 years, Porto, Portugal

Figure 1

Table 2 Association between lifestyles and acute myocardial infarction in women: adults aged ≥18 years, Porto, Portugal

Figure 2

Table 3 Association between lifestyles and acute myocardial infarction in men: adults aged ≥18 years, Porto, Portugal