Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T06:16:06.027Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Working together online to enhance learner autonomy: Analysis of learners’ perceptions of their online learning experience*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 January 2012

Jérôme Eneau  and
Christine Develotte
Jérôme Eneau*
Affiliation:
Université de Haute Bretagne, Place du Recteur Le Moal, 35000 Rennes, France (email: jerome.eneau@univ-rennes2.fr)
Christine Develotte*
Affiliation:
Institut National de Recherche Pédagogique, Allée de Fontenay, 69007 Lyon, France (email: christine.develotte@inrp.fr)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This study concerns the development of autonomy in adult learners working on an online learning platform as part of a professional master's degree programme in “French as a Foreign Language”. Our goal was to identify the influence of reflective and collaborative dimensions on the construction of autonomy for online learners in this programme. The material used was 27 self-analysis papers in response to an assignment which asked students to review their distance learning experience (reflective dimension) and to highlight the role of others, if any, in their learning (collaborative dimension). In addition to these two major points, the analysis by category of the body of results shows principally that in qualitative terms, the factors of autonomisation for online learning are interconnected and include: the difficulties related to distance learning and the strategies that learners develop to face those difficulties, the importance of interpersonal relationships in social and emotional terms in overcoming those difficulties, the specific modes of sociability developed for distance learning and the related development of a new type of autonomy that is both individual and collective. The discussion examines the creation, over the course of time, of a new “distance learning culture” that is nonetheless never easy to create and share.

Keywords

Learner autonomyself-directed learningonline collaborationreflective analysis
Type
Research Article
Information
ReCALL , Volume 24 , Issue 1 , 04 January 2012 , pp. 3 - 19
Copyright
Copyright © European Association for Computer Assisted Language Learning 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allford, D.Pachler, N. (2007) Language, Autonomy and the New Learning Environments. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Barbot, M. J.Camatarri, G. (1999) Autonomie et apprentissage. L'innovation dans la formation. Paris: PUF.Google Scholar
Benson, P. (2001) Teaching and Researching Autonomy in Language Learning. Harlow: Pearson.Google Scholar
Benson, P. (2007) Autonomy in language teaching and learning. Language Teaching, 40: 21–40.Google Scholar
Blin, F. (2004) Towards an activity-theoretical perspective on the study of CALL and learner autonomy? ReCALL, 16(2): 377–395.Google Scholar
Candas, P. (2009) Analyse de pratiques d’étudiants dans un Centre de Ressources de Langues: indicateurs d'autonomie dans l'apprentissage. Thèse de Doctorat en Sciences de l'Education. Université de Strasbourg.Google Scholar
Candy, P. (1991) Self-direction for lifelong learning: a comprehensive guide to theory and practice. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Chi, M. T. H. (1997) Quantifying qualitative analysis of verbal data: a practical guide. The journal of the learning sciences, 6(3): 271–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ciekanski, M. (2007) Fostering learner autonomy: Power and reciprocity in the relationship between language learner and language learning adviser. Cambridge Journal of Education, 37(1): 111–127.Google Scholar
Develotte, C. (2009) “From face to face to distance learning: the online learner's emerging identity”. In: Goodfellow, R. and Lamy, M. N., Learning Cultures in Online Education. London: Continuum, 71–92.Google Scholar
Eneau, J. (2005) La part d'autrui dans la formation de soi ; autonomie, autoformation et réciprocité en contexte organisationnel. Paris: L'Harmattan.Google Scholar
Eneau, J. (2008) From autonomy to reciprocity, or vice versa? French personalism's contribution to a new perspective on self-directed learning. Adult Education Quarterly, 58(3): 229–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eneau, J.Poyet, F. (2009) Contribution à la professionnalisation de futurs tuteurs en langues: le cas de l'apprentissage d'une langue étrangère à distance en synchronie. In: Develotte, C., Mangenot, F. and Nissen, E. (coord.), Actes du colloque Echanger pour apprendre en ligne (EPAL). Grenoble, 5–7 juin 2009.Google Scholar
Guichon, N. (2009) Training future language teachers to develop online tutors’ competence through reflective analysis. ReCALL, 21(2): 30–49.Google Scholar
Henri, F.Lundgren-Cayrol, K. (2001) Apprentissage collaboratif à distance. Sainte-Foy: Presses de l'Université du Québec.Google Scholar
Jézégou, A. (2008) Apprentissage autodirigé et formation à distance. Distances et Savoirs, 6(3): 343–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kerlinger, F. N.Lee, H. B. (2000) Foundations of Behavioral Research, (4th ed.). Holt, NY: Harcourt College Publishers.Google Scholar
Little, D. (1991) Learner Autonomy – 1: Definitions, Issues and Problems. Dublin: Authentik.Google Scholar
Loilier, T.Tellier, A. (2004) Comment peut-on se faire confiance sans se voir ? Le cas du développement des logiciels libres. M@n@gement, 7(3): 275–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, C. (2004) From other to self. Learning as interactional change. Uppsala: Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis.Google Scholar
Mebane, M. E., Sorace, R., Solimeno, A.Tomai, M. (2007) Gender differences in online collaborative learning groups promoting affective education and social capital. Psicologia Escolar e Educacional, 11: 27–36.Google Scholar
Moisan, A. (2007) L'ambivalence du sujet au cœur de la flexibilité de la formation et de l'emploi. Le cas des auditeurs du Cnam-Pays de la Loire inscrits en formation ouverte et à distance. Distance et savoirs, 5: 83–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Rourke, B.Carson, L. (eds.) (2010) Language Learner Autonomy: Policy, Curriculum, Classroom. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Oxford, R. L. (1990) Language learning strategies: what every teacher should know. Rowley, Mass.: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Pemberton, R., Toogood, S.Barfield, A. (2009) Maintaining Control: Autonomy and Language Learning. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raby, F. (2009) L'analyse de l'activité dans l'enseignement et l'apprentissage d'une langue étrangère (Le cas de l'anglais LVE), Une démarche ergonomique Thèse d'Habilitation à Diriger des Recherches. . Grenoble: Université Stendhal.Google Scholar
Simeone, A., Eneau, J.Rinck, F. (2007) Scénario d'apprentissage collaboratif à distance et en ligne: des compétences relationnelles sollicitées ou développées? International Journal of Information Sciences for Decision Marketing, 29. http://isdm.univ-tln.fr/PDF/isdm29/SIMEONE.pdfGoogle Scholar
Simeone, A., Eneau, J., Simonian, S. (2009). Collaboration et mémoires externes dans une formation en ligne: le rôle de la confiance dans un environnement virtuel d'apprentissage. In: Develotte, C., Mangenot, F. and Nissen, E. (coord.), Actes du colloque Echanger pour apprendre en ligne (EPAL).Grenoble, 5–7 juin 2009.Google Scholar
Simonian, S., Ravestein, J.Audran, J. (2006) Conditions didactiques de la transformation d'une liste de diffusion en outil collaboratif. Distances et savoirs, 4(4): 513–526.Google Scholar
Tremblay, N. A. (2003) L'autoformation, pour apprendre autrement. Montréal: Presses de l'Université de Montréal.Google Scholar
Tremblay, N. A.Eneau, J. (2006) Sujet, société et autoformation – Regards croisés du Québec et de France. Education Permanente, 168: 75–88.Google Scholar
Wenger, E. (1998) Communities of practice: learning, meaning and identity. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar