Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T22:51:39.797Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Le modèle de reproduction et d’accumulation d’A. Smith

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 August 2016

Michel Rosier*
Affiliation:
Université Paris 7
Get access

Extract

INTRODUCTION

Selon l’interprétation de la Richesse des nations restée dominante jusqu’à la seconde guerre mondiale, les questions de l’allocation des ressources, de la détermination des prix et de la répartition constituaient le « noyau dur » de cet ouvrage. A cette époque, H. Myint en prit le contrepied: « The method of regarding the problem of allocating ressources as the main concern of the classical economists fails to provide such a central unifying principle » (Myint, [1946], p. 120). Il proposa une autre grille de lecture ayant pour axe les problèmes ressortissant au développement et à la croissance. C’est dans cette perspective que s’inscriront par la suite certains travaux tentant de rendre compte de la cohérence et de la pertinence des thèses d’A. Smith dans le cadre de modèles macroéconomiques de croissance (Lowe, [1954 et 1975]; Thweatt, [1957]; Adelman, [1962]; Barkaï, [1969]; O’Brien, [1975]; Eltis, [1975]). Ces travaux ont en commun de faire abstraction de toute différenciation sectorielle et de prêter une attention toute particulière au couple smithien division du travail-extension du marché et, par là, d’attribuer une place primordiale à la question des rendements d’échelle. Schématiquement, A. Smith, ayant supposé des rendements d’échelle croissants, aurait eu une conception cumulative de la croissance, représentable graphiquement par une spirale.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Université catholique de Louvain, Institut de recherches économiques et sociales 1987 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Aldeman, I. [1962], Theories of Economic Growth and Development, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Anspach, R. [1976], Smith’s Growth Paradigm, History of Political Economy, Vol. 8, n° 4.Google Scholar
Barkai, H. [1969], A Formal Outline of a Smithian Growth Model, Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 83, n° 3.Google Scholar
Benetti, C. [1976], Valeur et répartition, PUG-Maspéro.Google Scholar
Benetti, C. [1981], La question de la gravitation des prix de marché dans la Richesse des Nations, Cahiers d’économie politique, n° 6.Google Scholar
Benetti, C. et Cartelier, J. [1980], Marchands, salariat et capitaliste, Maspéro.Google Scholar
Blaug, M. [1959], Welfare Indices in the Wealth of Nations, The Southern Economic Journal, Vol. 26, n° 4.Google Scholar
Blaug, M. [1961], La pensée économique, Economica, 1981.Google Scholar
Eltis, W.A. [1975], Adam Smith’s Theory of Economic Growth, in Essays on Adam Smith, ed. Skinner, A.S. and Wilson, T., Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Hicks, J.R. [1965], Capital and Growth, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hollander, S. [1971], Some Implications of Adam Smith’s Analysis of Investment Priorities, History of Political Economy, Vol. 3, n° 2.Google Scholar
Hollander, S. [1973), The Economics of Adam Smith, Heineman Educational Books.Google Scholar
Lowe, A. [1954], The Classical Theory of Economic Growth, Social Research, vol. 21, pp. 127158.Google Scholar
Lowe, A. [1975], Adam Smith’s System of Equilibrium Growth, in Essays on Adam Smith, ed. Skinner, A.S. and Wilson, T., Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Marx, K. [1863], Théories sur la plus-value, Editions sociales, 1974.Google Scholar
Moss, L.S. [1978], The Economics of Adam Smith: Professor Hollander’s Reappraisal, History of Political Economy, Vol. 8, n° 4.Google Scholar
Myint, H. [1943], The Welfare Significance of Productive Labour, The Review of Economic Studies, Vol. 11, n° 1.Google Scholar
Myint, H. [1946], The Classical View of Economic Problem, Economica, Vol. 13, n° 2.Google Scholar
Myint, H. [1949], Theories of Welfare Economics, Reprints of Economics Classics, Augustus M. Kelley, 1962.Google Scholar
O’Brien, D.P. [1975], The Classical Economists, Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Quesnay, F. [1758], Le tableau économique, in Tableau Economique des Physiocrates, Calmann-Lévy, 1969.Google Scholar
Reid, G.C. [1983], Adam Smith’s Analysis of Growth: ‘Cheerful’ or ‘Dull’?, University of Edinburgh Economics Department Discussion Paper III.Google Scholar
Reid, G.C. [1984], Adam Smith’s on Accumulation: A Formal Analysis, miméo, University of Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Ricardo, D. [1817], On the Principles of Political Economy and Taxation, The Works and Correspondence of David Ricardo, ed. Sraffa, P., Cambridge University Press, Vol. 1.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, N. [1968], Adam Smith, Consumers’ Tastes and Economic Growth, The Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 76, n° 3.Google Scholar
Rosenbluth, , [1969], A Note on Labour, Wages, and Rent in Smith’s Theory of Value, The Canadian Journal of Economics, Vol. 2.Google Scholar
Rosier, M. [1982], Valeur et problème du référentiel, in Cahiers d’économie politique, n° 8.Google Scholar
Samuelson, P.A. [1978], The Canonical Classical Model of Political Economy, Journal of Economic Literature, Vol. 16, n° 4.Google Scholar
Schumpeter, J.A. [1954], History of Economic Analysis, Oxford University Press, New York, 1976.Google Scholar
Smith, A. [1776], The Wealth of Nations, Cannan, Edition, The Modern Library, New York, 1965.Google Scholar
Sylos-Labini, P. [1976], Competition: The Product Market, The Market and the State, Essays in Honour of Adam Smith, ed. Wilson, T. et Skinner, A.S., Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Thweatt, W.C. [1957], A Diagrammatic Presentation of Adam Smith’s Growth Model, Social Research, Vol. 24, n° 2.Google Scholar
Turcot, A.R.J. [1769], Valeurs et monnaies, Ecrits économiques, Calmann-Lévy, 1970.Google Scholar